- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05861609
Pain Medication Tapering for Patients With Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2, Treated With Spinal Cord Stimulation. (PIANISSIMO)
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II (PSPS T2) is a condition in which patients are suffering from persistent low back pain, despite previously performed surgical interventions. One way to help patients to alleviate their pain, is with Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS). SCS is able to provide pain relief and a decrease in disability but also to decrease the amount of pain medication and more specifically opioid intake. Nevertheless, the number of patients that can eventually totally omit the use of opioids is rather limited.
In this trial, we will investigate the effect of a pain medication tapering program before starting the SCS trajectory as the new treatment strategy for patients implanted with SCS. This allows us to tackle the high burden of patients that are taking a lot of pain medication by proceeding towards a more logical treatment plan for a costly and debilitating condition.
A three-arm multicenter randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate whether there is a difference in disability (primary outcome) after 12 months of SCS in PSPS T2 patients after receiving a standardized pain medication tapering protocol before SCS implantation, a personalized pain medication tapering protocol before SCS implantation, or no tapering protocol before SCS implantation. Two different pain medication tapering programs (standardized versus personalized tapering) will be evaluated in this project. Pain medication tapering will be provided to 130 patients during a hospital stay, compared to 65 patients who do not undergo pain medication tapering before SCS implantation. Besides disability as primary outcome measure, several secondary outcome measurements will be collected namely pain intensity, health-related quality of life, participation, domains affected by substance use, anxiety and depression, medication use, psychological constructs, sleep, central sensitization and health expenditure. Outcome measurements will be collected at baseline, and after 1 month, 3, 6 and 12 months of SCS.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Maarten Moens, Prof, Dr.
- Phone Number: +3224775514
- Email: stimulusresearchgroup@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Lisa Goudman, Prof, Dr.
- Phone Number: +3224775514
- Email: stimulusresearchgroup@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Jette, Belgium, 1090
- Recruiting
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
-
Contact:
- Maarten Moens, Prof, Dr.
- Phone Number: +3224775514
- Email: stimulusresearchgroup@gmail.com
-
Lier, Belgium, 2500
- Not yet recruiting
- Heilig Hart Ziekenhuis Lier
-
Contact:
- Sofie Denkens, Dr.
-
Roeselare, Belgium, 8800
- Recruiting
- AZ Delta
-
Contact:
- Bart Billet, Dr.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with PSPS T2, defined as patients suffering from neuropathic pain of radicular origin with pain in the lower back and/or leg(s), of an intensity of at least 4/10 on the Numeric Rating Scale, for a period of at least 6 months after a minimum of one anatomically successful spinal surgery and being refractory to conservative treatment (according to Belgian reimbursement rules from January 1st, 2018)
- Patients need to be scheduled for SCS to be eligible for participation in the study
- Currently taking opioids
- 18 years and older
- Speaking and reading Dutch or French
Exclusion Criteria:
- Being actively treated for cancer.
- Having a life expectancy below 6 months.
- Receiving intrathecal drug delivery.
- Patients with contraindications for Clonidine (e.g., known hypotension which requires medication) or for Buprenorphine/Naloxone (e.g., severe respiratory insufficiency, hepatic insufficiency).
- Epilepsy treated by Pregabalin.
- Currently using benzodiazepines at more than 40 mg diazepam-equivalents per day.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: No pain medication tapering (usual care)
Usual care
|
Usual care with respect to Spinal Cord Stimulation implantation
|
|
Active Comparator: Standardized pain medication tapering
|
A standardized pain medication tapering program before Spinal Cord Stimulator implantation.
|
|
Active Comparator: Personalized pain medication tapering
|
A personalized pain medication tapering program before Spinal Cord Stimulator implantation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Disability
Time Frame: The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation
|
Disability, evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index
|
The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain intensity
Time Frame: The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
Pain intensity will be evaluated using a Visual Analogue Scale (100 mm).
|
The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
|
Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Euro Quality of Life with five dimensions and five levels.
|
The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
|
Participation
Time Frame: The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
The Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire is used to evaluate participation.
|
The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
|
Drug related patient characteristics and problems
Time Frame: The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
The Measurements in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation is used assess drug related patient characteristics and problems.
|
The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
|
Opioid craving
Time Frame: The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
Opioid craving will be assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale for Opioid Craving.
|
The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
|
Risk for aberrant medication-related behaviour
Time Frame: The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
The Current Opioid Misuse Measure is used to evaluate the risk for aberrant medication-related behaviour.
|
The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
|
Medication use
Time Frame: The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
The Medication Quantification Scale III is used to quantify pain medication use.
|
The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
|
Healthcare utilization
Time Frame: The change in healthcare utilization starting from the baseline screening up to 12 months after the intervention.
|
Healthcare utilization is investigated by two means: expenditures associated with in-hospital care are inventoried using the hospital claims data whereas other costs are collected through self-reported (diaries and questionnaires).
|
The change in healthcare utilization starting from the baseline screening up to 12 months after the intervention.
|
|
Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale is used to assess feelings of anxiety and depression.
|
The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
|
General Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
Perceived self-efficacy is evaluated using the General Self-Efficacy Scale.
|
The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
|
Pain Catastrophizing
Time Frame: The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
With the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, catastrophizing thoughts or feelings accompanying the previously experienced pain are evaluated.
|
The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
|
Coping
Time Frame: The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
The Multidimensional Pain Inventory is used to assess the participants coping strategy profile.
|
The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
|
Sleep quality
Time Frame: The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index is used to assess sleep quality.
|
The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
|
Symptoms of Central Sensitization
Time Frame: The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
To assess symptoms associated with central sensitization, the Central Sensitization Inventory is used.
|
The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PIANISSIMO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Stimulation
-
Lian-Cing Yan, MSPTNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Stimulation | Spinal Cord Injury/Damage | Spinal Cord Injury Thoracic | Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) | Spinal Cord Injury T1-L2 | Epidural Electrical StimulationTaiwan
-
Case Western Reserve UniversityCompletedSpinal Cord Stimulation | High-frequency Stimulation | High-density StimulationUnited States
-
Spine Care, OklahomaCompletedSpinal Cord StimulationUnited States
-
University of Castilla-La ManchaHospital Nacional de Parapléjicos de ToledoUnknownSpinal Cord Stimulation | Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation | Dose-response RelationshipSpain
-
Francis FarhadiRecruitingCervical Myelopathy | Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury | Electric Stimulation Therapy | Spinal Cord StimulationUnited States
-
Brai²nRecruitingPersistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2 (PSPS-T2), Lower Spine | Spinal Cord Sensitivity to Neurostimulation | Neurophysiological Sensitivity to Spinal Cord StimulationBelgium
-
Jocelyne BlochEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneRecruitingDeep Brain Stimulation | Neuro: Spinal Cord InjurySwitzerland
-
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildCompletedSpinal Cord StimulationFrance
-
Jill M. Wecht, Ed.D.Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRecruitingBlood Pressure | Spinal Cord Injuries | SCI - Spinal Cord Injury | Blood Pressure Disorders | Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury | Acute Spinal Cord Injury | Neuromodulation | Spinal Cord StimulationUnited States
-
Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western DenmarkUniversity of Southern DenmarkCompletedTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation | Rehabilitation | Spinal Cord Injury | NeurorehabilitationDenmark
Clinical Trials on Usual care
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedMultiple Sclerosis | FatigueGermany
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyMammazentrum Hamburg am Krankenhaus Jerusalem, Germany; Dorit und Alexander...Completed
-
European Institute for Evidence Based Osteopathic...Unknown
-
Suzanna ZickUniversity of MichiganTerminatedQuality of Life | Fatigue | Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic | Sleep | Pain, ChronicUnited States
-
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCompleted
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedOsteoarthritis | Mindfulness | MBSRFrance
-
Gachon University Gil Oriental Medical HospitalKorea Health Industry Development InstituteCompletedKnee Replacement | AcupunctureKorea, Republic of
-
Mayo ClinicCompleted
-
The Miriam HospitalNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart FailureUnited States
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteUnknownDepression | Quality of Life | Sleep | Anxiety | Dry EyeCanada