The Effect of Digital-Based Simulation on Physiotherapy Students

July 24, 2025 updated by: Marmara University

The Effect of Digital-Based Simulation Education on Self-Efficacy and Clinical Reasoning Skills in Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Students

In physiotherapy and rehabilitation education, basic medical courses, clinical information, rehabilitation approaches, special teachings of the profession, clinical problem solving and analysis in their fields are taught during university education.

Musculoskeletal problems will be selected for the patient scenarios to be used in the simulation and algorithms will be arranged for the simulation. After the algorithms are created, a website with patient scenarios containing these algorithms will be established with the support of a software company. In addition to the website, a database will be created and the applications made on the site will be recorded.

In our study, stepped wedge design will be used. 100 volunteer students participating in the study will start face-to-face training after preliminary evaluations are made. Afterwards, every two weeks, a randomized group of 20 people will be included in the hybrid training, which includes both face-to-face and simulation training. In the face-to-face education group, the educational content prepared in parallel with the patient scenarios in the hybrid education group will be applied in the classroom environment by the students together with the educators themselves. In the hybrid training group, one case analysis will be done every week on the website designed under the supervision of researchers, and one case analysis will be done through face-to-face training.

The self-efficacy and clinical reasoning levels of the students included in the study will be evaluated with the Physiotherapist Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and the Clinical Reasoning Assessment Tool. The same evaluations will be repeated after the students in both groups have completed their 10-week education. Afterwards, students' satisfaction levels and suggestions from the simulation will be evaluated with qualitative questions, and opinions and suggestions about simulation will be collected by creating themes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Clinical reasoning is one of the most fundamental skills in health professions education and is essential for engaging in clinical practice. In many studies, it is stated that the learning of the clinical reasoning process in undergraduate students should be included in the curricula and learning objectives.

Self-efficacy is a concept that is effective in shaping one's behavior. Academic self-efficacy is the individual's belief in himself about how successful he will be in the face of the academic tasks he will face throughout his academic life and at what level he can fulfill these tasks.

In recent years, digital learning designs have been increasingly used in teaching practices in higher education. Various designs offer opportunities to improve self-regulation abilities, facilitate active learning, and make the learning process more transparent. It covers a variety of technologies such as digital learning designs, virtual reality, podcasts, apps, educational games, 360° video and animations. These technologies can be applied directly in learning activities or combined with other planned learning activities.

In studies, digital learning designs in physiotherapy education have been criticized because they are not based on a theoretical learning perspective. A systematic review on the role of computer-assisted learning in physiotherapy education concluded that it has been substantially less researched compared to other health professions education.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Marmara University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being an undergraduate student at Marmara University Faculty of Health Sciences Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department
  • Having agreed to participate in the study
  • Being in the 6th semester of their studies

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusing to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hybrid Education
60 volunteer students participating in the study will start face-to-face training after preliminary evaluations are made. Afterwards, a randomized group of 10 people will be included in the simulation training every week. In the face-to-face education group, a case analysis will be applied by the students themselves together with the educators in the classroom environment. In the simulation group, one case analysis will be made every week on the website designed under the supervision of researchers.
Algorithms will be created for various musculoskeletal diseases and these algorithms will be controlled by taking the opinions of physiotherapists and physicians who are experts in their fields. After the algorithms are created, a website with patient scenarios containing these algorithms will be established with the support of a software company. In addition to the website, a database will be created and the applications made on the site will be recorded. In this way, the data of users using the website will be collected.
Active Comparator: Face to Face Education
60 volunteer students participating in the study will start face-to-face training after preliminary evaluations are made. Afterwards, a randomized group of 10 people will be included in the simulation training every week. In the face-to-face education group, a case analysis will be applied by the students themselves together with the educators in the classroom environment. In the simulation group, one case analysis will be made every week on the website designed under the supervision of researchers.
In the face-to-face education group, one case analyzes will be applied by the students together with the educators themselves in the classroom environment, with the educational content prepared in parallel with the patient scenarios in the simulation-based education group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-efficacy will be measured using a Turkish version of Physiotherapist Self-Efficacy Questionnaire-musculoskeletal area.
Time Frame: 6 weeks

The questionnaire consists of 13 items. The participants will asked to indicate their confidence to perform the described task (1 = very little confidence; 5 = a lot of confidence). Higher scores are related more confidence self-efficacy.

Outcomes will be evaluated before and after the intervention.

6 weeks
The 'Clinical Reasoning Assesment Tool (CRAT)' will be used in clinical reasoning assessment.
Time Frame: 6 weeks

The CRAT, a rubric scale, is scored by the evaluator marking on the Visual Analog Scale. CRAT aims to assess students' readiness to enter the clinical setting and facilitate student self-monitoring. The tool aims to actively participate in the student's development by identifying strong or weak areas in three areas (content knowledge - procedural knowledge and psychomotor skill - conceptual reasoning).

Outcomes will be evaluated before and after the intervention.

6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 11, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Clinical Reasoning

Clinical Trials on Digital based simulation

Subscribe