Perioperative SDD to Prevent Infectious Complications After Esophagectomy (PERSuaDER)

February 28, 2025 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

PERi-operative Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract to Prevent Severe Infectious Complications After Esophagectomy: a Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial in Patients with Primary Resectable Esophageal Carcinoma (cT1-4, N0-3, M0)

The primary aim of the PERSuaDER-trial is to evaluate the effect of SDD on infectious complications after esophagectomy, focussed on the prevention of pneumonia

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Esophagectomy is a complex surgical procedure, associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Most postoperative complications are caused by infections (10-30%). These are thought to arise from (micro-)aspiration of bacteria residing in the oropharyngeal and gastrointestinal (GI) tract, leading to (respiratory) infections. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) is a prophylactic antibiotic strategy that aims to prevent postoperative infections. Pathogenic aerobic gram-negative rods and yeasts tract are reduced, while anaerobic, protective microbiota are preserved. SDD has been shown to lower the risk for respiratory infections in an intensive care setting. Establishing SDD as effective addition to the standard care of esophagectomy patients is expected to increase their chance of survival.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

854

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Recruiting
        • UZ Leuven
        • Contact:
          • Ward Seurs, MD
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6525GA
        • Recruiting
        • Radboudumc
        • Contact:
          • Justin GA Grootenhuis, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of primary esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma (cT1b-4a,N0-3,M0) in the mid or distal esophagus or at the level of the gastro-esophageal junction scheduled for undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy with curative intent or for esophageal reconstruction with a gastric or jejunal interposition
  • Age ≥ 18 years,
  • Able to give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients planned for rescue surgery,
  • Patients planned for colonic interposition,
  • Known or suspected pregnancy,
  • Patients who have undergone upper GI surgery within 30 days before randomization,
  • Unable to understand the study information, study instructions and give informed consent.
  • Patients enrolled in a trial that would interact with the intervention
  • Patients with a known allergy, sensitivity, or interaction to investigational medicinal product.
  • Patients with known/documented colonization of Enterobacteriaceae and or Pseudomonas Aeruginosa that are resistant to both tobramycin/gentamicin and to carbapenem antibiotics
  • Patients undergoing CVVH.
  • Patients with documented chronic renal failure (GFR < 15 mls/min) or who are on chronic intermittent hemo- or peritoneal dialysis,
  • Women of childbearing potential at risk of pregnancy, not using adequate contraception,
  • Patients with the inability to swallow the SDD
  • Patients with pre-existing degenerative neuromuscular diseases like, but not limited to, myasthenia gravis or Parkinson disease).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of care
Experimental: SDD treatment
Standard of care + SDD treatment

The intervention group receives SDD treatment additional to standard care, comprising two distinct liquids for oral administration: first the 5 ml amphotericin B suspension (100 mg/ml) and subsequently the 5 ml "SDD base for suspension", containing both colistin sulphate (20 mg/ml) and tobramycin sulphate (16 mg/ml).

Patients take the 5 ml amphotericin B, followed by the 5 ml "SDD base for suspension", four times daily for one week, starting three days prior to the surgery. On the day of surgery, intake is limited to an early morning and a late evening dose.

Other Names:
  • Standard of care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the cumulative incidence of postoperative pneumonia within 30 days after surgery
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery

The primary outcome parameter is the cumulative incidence of postoperative pneumonia within 30 days after surgery. Pneumonia will be defined by the following criteria:

  • Positive sputum culture OR
  • Presence of a new progressive radiographic infiltrate plus at least 2 of the following clinical features:
  • Fever > 38.5°C
  • Leukocytosis (>11.0) or leukopenia (<4.0)
  • Purulent secretions
Within 30 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the cumulative incidence of anastomotic leakage within 30 days after esophagectomy for which endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical re-intervention is needed
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery
the cumulative incidence of anastomotic leakage within 30 days after esophagectomy for which endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical re-intervention is needed. This corresponds to the definition of the ECCG of anastomotic leakage type II and III Low, Alderson (3). Anastomotic leakage is defined by contrast leakage on CT-scan with intravenous and oral contrast (swallow CT-scan) upon clinical suspicion, by endoscopy or by drainage of ingested materials into the chest tube (thoracic anastomoses) or ingested materials or saliva into cervical wound (cervical anastomosis) or signs of anastomotic leakage during re-intervention or autopsy
Within 30 days after surgery
the mortality rate within 90 days after surgery
Time Frame: Within 90 days after surgery
All-cause mortality
Within 90 days after surgery
the rate of re-operation within 30 days after surgery
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery
Rate of re-operation
Within 30 days after surgery
the postoperative length of stay on the intensive care unit (ICU) within 6 months after surgery defined in days
Time Frame: Within 6 months after surgery
the postoperative length of stay on the intensive care unit (ICU), including re-admissions
Within 6 months after surgery
the postoperative length of the total hospital stay within 6 months after surgery defined in days
Time Frame: Within 6 months after surgery
the postoperative length of the total hospital stay, including re-admissions for any reasons within 6 months after surgery
Within 6 months after surgery
Quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C30)
Time Frame: After 30 days, 3 months and 6 months after surgery
This study aims to determine the differences in the quality of life after 30 days, 3 months and 6 months after surgery using the following questionnaire European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C30): All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Using paper or electronical forms, whatever a participant prefers paper forms or a printed version will be provided.
After 30 days, 3 months and 6 months after surgery
Quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ OG25)
Time Frame: After 30 days, 3 months and 6 months after surgery
This study aims to determine the differences in the quality of life after 30 days, 3 months and 6 months after surgery using the following questionnaire European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Oesophago Gastric module 25 (EORTC QLQ OG25): All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score for all the scales and single-items represents a high level of symptomatology or problems. Using paper or electronical forms, whatever a participant prefers paper forms or a printed version will be provided.
After 30 days, 3 months and 6 months after surgery
Quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: After 30 days, 3 months and 6 months after surgery
•This study aims to determine the differences in the quality of life after 30 days, 3 months and 6 months after surgery using the following questionnaire The 5-level EuroQol-5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L). This descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. It is scaled from 0 to 100%. A higher score indicates a higher quality of life. Using paper or electronical forms, whatever a participant prefers paper forms or a printed version will be provided.
After 30 days, 3 months and 6 months after surgery
Direct and indirect costs defined in Euros
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after surgery
The in-hospital and societal costs up to 6 months after surgery will be estimated with the help of the medical consumption questionnaire and the productivity cost questionnaire, developed by the iMTA. For Belgium a database cross linkage with the RIZIV/INAMI expenses is foreseen based on data pseudonymized by a Trusted Third Party and handled by KCE. The Belgian national patient identifier number will be used for data linkage with the expenses database of the health insurance provider, but will be withdrawn from the dataset by KCE before the analysis is performed.
Up to 6 months after surgery
the cumulative incidence of all postoperative infectious complications within 30 days after surgery
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery
the cumulative incidence of all postoperative infectious complications as registered in DUCA (postoperative pneumonia, urinary tract infection, wound infection/abscess requiring wound opening or antibiotic treatment, central line infection requiring line removal or antibiotic treatment, intra-thoracic/intra-abdominal abscess, generalised sepsis as defined by Evans, Rhodes (2), infections with Highly-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (HRE) and Clostridium difficile, other infections requiring antibiotics. All these complications are then graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification
Within 30 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Camiel Rosman, Prof, RadoudUMC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 21, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-504144-33-00

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

A subset of the final data will be made available after an embargo period upon request. Most likely aggregated and filtered in order to maintain anonymity of individual patient data. The choice of online repository still has to be made.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

six months after database lock

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Upon request to the Principal investigator, with a sufficiently substantiated study protocol.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Cancer

Clinical Trials on SDD

Subscribe