PPIO-004 Clinical Application of Efficacy Prediction Model Based on Epigenomics Sequencing Technology in Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Esophageal Cancer (PPIO-004-EC001)

Clinical Application of Efficacy Prediction Model Based on Epigenomics Sequencing Technology in Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Esophageal Cancer

The goal of this observational study is to learn about in potential operable esophageal cancer patients (cT1-2N + M0 and cT3NanyM0) receiving neoadjuvant therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: Objective response rate, Major pathological response rate. Participants will receive two to four cycles of tislelizumab plus albuminpaclitaxel and platinum-based therapy

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer in the world (934,870 new cases) and the sixth most common cause of cancer death (287,270 new cases). The incidence, prevalence and histological type of esophageal cancer vary by region. About 75% of cases occur in Asia, with China accounting for the highest proportion, accounting for about 50% of the total number of cases and cancer-specific deaths. According to China's National Bureau of Statistics in 2022, there were 252,500 cases of esophageal cancer and 193,900 deaths in China in 2016, making esophageal cancer the sixth most common cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death in the country. The etiologies of the two most common histological subtypes (esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [ESCC] and adenocarcinoma) vary widely. In the West, heavy drinking and smoking and their synergies are major risk factors for ESCC [3]. However, in low-income countries, such as parts of Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, the major risk factors for ESCC (which typically accounts for more than 90% of all esophageal cancer cases) have not been elucidated.

For subjects with locally advanced ESCC, international treatment guidelines recommend esophagectomy followed by preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

However, in the clinical practice, many subjects with locally advanced ESCC receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy rather than neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, due to safety concerns regarding the use of radiotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy and difficulties in cross-clinical collaboration, and may not receive the best benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. For the preoperative treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer, preoperative chemotherapy also has a better survival benefit than surgery alone. In the Medical Research Council OEO2 study, median survival was 16.8 months in the preoperative chemotherapy group and 13.3 months in the surgery alone group, with 2-year survival rates of 43% and 34%, respectively. Long-term follow-up confirmed that preoperative chemotherapy had a survival benefit, with 5-year survival rates of 23% in the preoperative chemotherapy group and 17.1% in the surgery alone group. And data on other immune checkpoint inhibitors suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy improves clinical outcomes.

PD-1 inhibitors have demonstrated significant benefits as second-line and first-line therapy for ESCC and in combination with chemotherapy for many other solid tumors. Preclinical studies have shown that the PD-1/PD-L1 axis can be activated early in solid tumors, and the preoperative induction of immune response may have a lasting protective effect. Preoperative immunotherapy is likely to be more effective given that the tumor antigen drops sharply after surgical resection and the removal of intact blood vessels and lymph nodes that deliver the drug may affect immunotherapy efficacy. Several Phase 1/2 and 2 studies have shown a controllable safety profile and preliminary demonstration of efficacy when adding PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to perioperative treatment in resectable EC subjects. PD-1 inhibitors have shown significant benefits in both second-line and first-line treatment. Given the evidence of antitumor activity of immunotherapy in patients with ESCC and the continuing need to improve survival and reduce recurrence rates of resectable esophageal cancer, several studies exploring the antitumor activity of immunotherapy in the treatment of resectable disease have tentatively shown promising prospects as a neoadjuvant therapy.

tislelizumab, as an innovative PD-1 inhibitor, has shown similar benefits to other PD-1 inhibitors in a variety of tumor types. Bb-a317-205 also showed preliminary antitumor activity in ESCC subjects, with a confirmed ORR of 46.7%, DCR of 80%, and DOR of 12.8 months. The median OS was 14.31 months. In addition, three pivotal Phase 3 studies in the ESCC field are underway (studies BGB-A317-302, BGB-A317-306, BGB-A317-311, and BGB-A317-213).

Therefore, the combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tislelizumab may be a potential treatment option to improve the benefit of potentially resectable locally advanced ESCC subjects.

Cancer survival rates are often low, most likely due to advanced stage of diagnosis and limited access to timely and reasonable treatment. Early and accurate detection of cancer is important for clinical diagnosis, effective toxicity monitoring, and ultimately successful treatment of cancer. In the context of the current "precision medicine" concept, disease assessment should selectively obtain and extract key biological information from clinical phenotypes, pathological characteristics and molecular information of diseases, and carry out qualitative, positioning, quantitative and periodic accurate analysis of these information, laying the foundation for disease classification, clinical decision-making and prognosis. Based on accurate analysis of patients' biological information, treatment principles, rules and guidelines based on empirical evidence, combined with patients' unique physiological, psychological, social characteristics and personal will, effective treatment methods are wisely selected and integrated to form the best treatment plan that fits patients' unique characteristics.

In the context of the current "precision medicine" concept, disease assessment should selectively obtain and extract key biological information from clinical phenotypes, pathological characteristics and molecular information of diseases, and carry out qualitative, positioning, quantitative and periodic accurate analysis of these information, laying the foundation for disease classification, clinical decision-making and prognosis. At present, several prediction models for evaluating the efficacy and prognosis of patients have been developed by using public databases at home and abroad. However, due to the small sample size, less information included in the models and lack of clinical practice, the reliability is weak.

Therefore, new biomarkers need to be developed to better select patients, and the development of strong biomarkers and improved patient selection will be key to combination immunotherapy.

Objective response rate, major pathological response rate, pathological complete response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival, disease control rate, duration of response, R0 removal rate, adverse events, and potential predictive biomarkers were evaluated in patients undergoing surgery after tirelizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy. Explore potential Cancer biomarkers in patients undergoing surgery after receiving tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

62

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Chongqing
      • Chongqing, Chongqing, China, 400042
        • Army Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥18 years old;
  2. Pathology (histology) confirmed potentially resectable stage cT1-2N + M0 and stage cT3NanyM0 ESCC (AJCC 8th edition); 3. Received tirelizumab combined with chemotherapy before surgery; 4.ECOG score: 0 or 1; 5. R0 radical excision can be performed; 6. Measurable or evaluable lesions assessed by the investigator according to RECIST version 1.1; 7. With my consent and signed informed consent, I shall comply with the planned visit, research treatment, laboratory examination and other test procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with other malignant tumors;
  2. Prior treatment for ESCC, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or prior antibody or drug therapy against PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, or any other specific T-cell costimulation or checkpoint pathway;
  3. They are not eligible to receive platinum-containing double-drug chemotherapy regimen, chemoradiotherapy or surgery;
  4. Patients with a history of fistulas caused by primary tumor infiltration, patients assessed by the investigator as being at high risk of fistulas or showing signs of perforation, and severe malnutrition;
  5. Poorly controlled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion or ascites requiring frequent drainage (recurrence within 2 weeks after intervention)
  6. Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing history or known acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS);
  7. A history of interstitial lung disease, non-infectious pneumonia or poorly controlled lung disease (including pulmonary fibrosis, acute lung disease, etc.);
  8. Any positive test result for hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus indicating the presence of a virus, such as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg, Australian antigen) positive or hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV) positive (except HCV-RNA negative);
  9. Those who have a history of drug abuse and cannot abstain or have mental disorders;
  10. Known history of allogeneic organ transplantation or allohematopoietic stem cell transplantation;
  11. Patients who are participating in other clinical trials or participating in other clinical trials with less than 4 weeks to end;
  12. Pregnant or lactating women;
  13. Patients with a BMI < 18.5mg/m2 or a weight loss greater than 10% before screening;
  14. Other conditions that the researchers believe will affect the progress of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: tislelizumab, Q3W with TP regimen
Tislelizumab 200mg, Q3W, 2-4 cycles Albumin paclitaxel 240 mg/m², adjusted according to the patient Carboplatin: AUC=5 Q3W, d1 or cisplatin: 20mg/m² iv, D1-3 Q3W or Nedaplatin: 70mg d1 Q3W
Tislelizumab 200mg, Q3W, 2-4 cycles Albumin paclitaxel 240 mg/m², adjusted according to the patient Carboplatin: AUC=5 Q3W, d1 or cisplatin: 20mg/m² iv, D1-3 Q3W or Nedaplatin: 70mg d1 Q3W
Other Names:
  • cisplatin
  • Carboplatin
  • Nedaplatin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective response rate
Time Frame: Up to approximately 6 months
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Up to approximately 6 months
Major pathological response rate
Time Frame: At Surgery approximately 4weeks after last treatment
Pathological results were obtained after surgery
At Surgery approximately 4weeks after last treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathological complete response rate
Time Frame: At Surgery approximately 4weeks after last treatment
Pathological results were obtained after surgery
At Surgery approximately 4weeks after last treatment
Overall survival
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
From enrollment to death
Up to 24 months
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
From enrollment to Progression
Up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 13, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Tislelizumab

3
Subscribe