BALANCE+ Vanguard Phase (BALANCE+)

September 26, 2024 updated by: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

BALANCE+: A Platform Trial for Gram Negative Bloodstream Infections

The goal of the BALANCE+ clinical trial is to transform random care to randomized care for patients with Gram negative bloodstream infections to inform best treatment approaches and optimize outcomes.

BALANCE+, a perpetual platform trial, will efficiently answer multiple questions that are important for hospitalized patients with Gram negative bloodstream infections.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are common and lethal, ranking among the top 7 causes of death, with 600,000 cases and 90,000 deaths per year in North America, and 1.2 Million cases and 150,000 deaths per year in Europe. Despite being a leading cause of death worldwide, bloodstream infections remain understudied. Treatment approaches are complicated by rising rates of antimicrobial resistance and declining new drug development.

BALANCE+ provides a platform upon which to answer multiple pressing cross-cutting questions for patients with Gram negative bloodstream infections, including the concept of de-escalating antibiotic spectrum, optimal transition to oral antibiotics, and the role for routine follow up blood culture testing. The trial will also include a syndrome-specific question of whether to remove or retain a central vascular catheter, and a pathogen-specific question of whether cephalosporins are sufficient for patients with low-risk AmpC organisms. As each question is answered, optimal therapies will be adopted into usual care, and new questions will be introduced into the platform of the trial. The evidence generated by BALANCE+ will improve cure for this vulnerable patient population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

174

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada
        • Foothills Hospital
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada
        • Peter Lougheed Centre
    • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • Saint John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
        • Eastern Regional Health Authority
    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
        • The Ottawa Hospital
      • St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
        • Niagara Health System
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N3M5
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Mount Sinai Hospital
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • University Health Network
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • North York General Hospital
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Michael Garron Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

PLATFORM INCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. admitted to a participating hospital
  2. positive blood culture with Gram negative (GN) bacterium

PLATFORM EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. patient's goals of care are for palliation with no active treatment
  2. moribund patient, not expected to survive > 72 hours

DOMAIN SPECIFIC INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

(A) DE-ESCALATION VS. NO DE-ESCALATION DOMAIN

Inclusion Criteria

1. included in BALANCE+ platform

Exclusion Criteria

  1. receiving an empiric antibiotic regimen at the time of blood culture finalization to which the GN pathogen(s) are not sensitive
  2. carbapenem-resistance (so that patients will not need to remain on reserve-use agents)
  3. no de-escalation option due to any or all of

    i. resistance ii. allergies iii. medical contraindications iv. drug-interaction risk v. other relevant reason

  4. patients with a suspected or proven polymicrobial source of infection

(B) BETA-LACTAM VS. NON-BETA-LACTAM ORAL/ENTERAL TREATMENT DOMAIN

Inclusion Criteria

  1. included in BALANCE+ platform
  2. initially treated with intravenous antibiotics, but clinical team transitioning patient to oral/enteral antibiotic within 7 days of starting treatment

Exclusion Criteria

  1. enrolled in an arm of another BALANCE+ platform domain which limits the use of oral/enteral therapy

    - no-de-escalation arm

  2. no non-beta-lactam options due to any or all of

    i. resistance ii. allergies iii. medical contraindications iv. drug-interaction risk v. other relevant reason

  3. no beta-lactam options due to any or all of

    i. resistance ii. allergies iii. medical contraindications iv. drug-drug interaction risk v. other relevant reason

(C) CENTRAL VASCULAR CATHETER REPLACEMENT DOMAIN

Inclusion Criteria

  1. included in BALANCE+ platform
  2. has an indwelling central vascular catheter that was already in place within the 48-hour period before the onset of bloodstream infection (i.e. is not a new catheter placed within 48 hours of the onset of infection)

Exclusion Criteria

  1. patient has no ongoing need for a central vascular catheter
  2. patient has definite indication for central vascular catheter removal

    1. ongoing septic shock with definite/probable line source
    2. concomitant S. aureus bacteremia
    3. concomitant candidemia
    4. local suppurative signs (severe redness, warmth, pain, swelling or fluctuance/collection) necessitating catheter removal, or other clinical evidence of infected line (e.g. imaging/echocardiographic findings)
    5. definite alternative source of GN BSI

(D) LOW-RISK AmpC DOMAIN

Inclusion Criteria

  1. included in BALANCE+ platform
  2. positive blood culture with GN bacterium, of the following species

    1. Serratia spp.
    2. Morganella spp.
    3. Providencia spp.
    4. Proteus spp. other than P.mirabilis
    5. organism is sensitive to ceftriaxone

Exclusion Criteria

  1. severe allergy to beta-lactams (eg, type 4 hypersensitivity reaction or DRESS)
  2. baseline phenotypic resistance to ceftriaxone

(E) FOLLOW UP BLOOD CULTURE DOMAIN

Inclusion Criteria

1. included in BALANCE+ platform

Exclusion Criteria

  1. patient already discharged home prior to day 4
  2. definite indication for repeat blood culture testing

    1. concomitant Staph. aureus bacteremia
    2. concomitant Candidemia
    3. clinical suspicion for infective endocarditis (e.g., presence of prosthetic valve, implantable cardiac device)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: De-escalation VS No De-escalation

No de-escalation group: continue to receive the same antibiotic that was started initially (as long as it is confirmed to be effective based on the blood culture sensitivity result)

De-escalation group: switched to narrower spectrum antibiotic.

Active Comparator: Oral beta-lactams VS Oral Non-beta-lactams

Beta-lactam antibiotic: This can be ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Non beta-lactam antibiotic: This can be, but not limited to, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cephalexin, cefadroxil, or cefixime.

Active Comparator: Central vascular catheter retention VS Central vascular catheter replacement

Central vascular catheter replacement: the catheter will be changed by the treating team as soon as possible and within a maximum of 72 hours from blood culture finalization

Central vascular catheter retention: the catheter will not be changed and will be retained until it is no longer needed.

Active Comparator: Cephalosporin VS Carbapenem for low risk AmpC organisms

Cephalosporin (ceftriaxone) at standard doses

Carbapenem (like Meropenem, Ertapenem etc) at standard doses

Active Comparator: Routine follow-up blood culture VS No routine follow-up blood culture

Routine follow-up blood culture: routine repeat blood collection 4 days from the index blood collection with positive bacteria.

No follow-up blood culture: no routine repeat blood collection 4 days from the index blood collection with positive bacteria

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate (co-primary outcomes of BALANCE+ vanguard phase)
Time Frame: 1 year
Recruitment rate will be measured as the number of patients randomized to each study domain, overall, and by individual participating site. Investigators will target a minimum overall recruitment rate of 1 patient/site/month in the de-escalation domain, beta-lactam versus non-beta-lactam stepdown domain, and FUBC domain; and 0.25 patients/site/month in the line replacement domain.
1 year
Protocol adherence (co-primary outcomes of BALANCE+ vanguard phase)
Time Frame: 1 year
Protocol adherence will be calculated differently depending on the domain, but in each case will require adherence to the specific intervention arm and complete follow-up for the primary outcome. Investigators will target ≥90% adherence in each arm of each domain.
1 year
De-escalation versus no de-escalation domain
Time Frame: 90 days
  • Patient-centered, ordinal Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) outcome: (dead at 90 days) < (alive at 90 days with reinfection and readmission) < (alive at 90 days with reinfection or readmission) < (alive at 90 days with neither reinfection nor readmission)
  • Tie-breaker within ordinal levels: new antimicrobial resistance (AMR) colonization or infection from routine cultures
90 days
Oral beta-lactam versus non beta-lactam domain
Time Frame: 90 days
  • Ordinal DOOR outcome: (dead at 90 days) < (alive at 90 days with reinfection and readmission) < (alive at 90 days with reinfection or readmission) < (alive at 90 days with neither reinfection nor readmission)
  • Tie-breaker within ordinal levels: new AMR colonization or infection from routine cultures
90 days
Central vascular catheter retention versus replacement domain
Time Frame: 90 days
  • Ordinal DOOR outcome: (dead at 90 days) < (alive at 90 days with reinfection and readmission) < (alive at 90 days with reinfection or readmission) < (alive at 90 days with neither reinfection nor readmission)
  • No tie-breaker
90 days
Low-risk AmpC domain
Time Frame: 90 days
  • Ordinal DOOR outcome: (dead at 90 days) < (alive at 90 days with reinfection and readmission) < (alive at 90 days with reinfection or readmission) < (alive at 90 days with neither reinfection nor readmission)
  • Tie-breaker within ordinal levels: new AMR colonization or infection from routine cultures
90 days
Follow-up blood culture domain
Time Frame: 90 days
  • Ordinal DOOR outcome: (dead at 90 days) < (alive at 90 days with reinfection and readmission) < (alive at 90 days with reinfection or readmission) < (alive at 90 days with neither reinfection nor readmission)
  • No tie-breaker
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
30-day mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
90-day mortality
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days
60-day mortality
Time Frame: 60 days
60 days
90-day reinfection
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days
90-day all cause readmission
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days
90-day AMR colonization/infection
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days
90-day Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI)
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nick Daneman, MD, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
  • Principal Investigator: Rob Fowler, MD, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 26, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 23, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gram-negative Bacteremia

Clinical Trials on De-escalation VS No De-escalation

Subscribe