A Novel COMBinATorial Therapy with Albumin and Enoxaparin in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis At High-risk of Poor Outcome (COMBAT Trial). (COMBAT)

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine primarily whether a combinatorial therapy based on the administration of human albumin and enoxaparin is safe and effective in patients with decompensated cirrhosis discharged from the hospital. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is this combinatorial therapy safe and tolerable?
  • Is this combinatorial therapy effective?
  • does this combinatorial therapy cost more or less than standard medical therapy? Participants will attend to study visits in which several test will be performed to asses disease evolution while they are taking study medication.

Researchers will compare experimental group treated with combinatorial therapy plus standard treatment with control group treated with standard treatment to see if there are differences in the responses to the questions raised above.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Clichy, France, 92110
        • Recruiting
        • Hopital Beaujon
        • Contact:
      • Aachen, Germany, 52074
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Aachen AöR
        • Contact:
          • Tony Bruns, PI
      • Münster, Germany, 48149
        • Recruiting
        • Universität Münster
        • Contact:
          • Jonel Trebicka, PI
    • Emilia Romagna
      • Bologna, Emilia Romagna, Italy, 40138
        • Recruiting
        • IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola
        • Contact:
    • Piemonte
      • Torino, Piemonte, Italy, 10126
        • Recruiting
        • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino"
        • Contact:
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron-VHIR
        • Contact:
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona-FCRB
        • Contact:
      • Madrid, Spain, 28034
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
        • Contact:
          • Agustín Albillos, PI
      • London, United Kingdom, NW3 2QG
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Royal Free Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Rajeshwar Mookerjee

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 18 and 80 years.
  2. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis admitted to hospital due to AD according to the EASL-CLIF criteria (rapid onset of ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, portal hypertensive-related gastrointestinal bleeding, bacterial infection, or any combination of these).
  3. CLIF-C AD score ≥ 45 at admission or at any time during hospital stay.
  4. Recovery from AD and expected to be discharged within the next 72 hours.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) grade 3 or higher according to the EASL-CLIF criteria at admission or at any time during the index hospitalization
  2. Admission for planned diagnostic or therapeutic procedures
  3. Recent acute bleeding (unless the cause has been effectively treated and there is no evidence of ongoing bleeding for at least 5 days)
  4. Chronic bleeding requiring periodic blood transfusions
  5. Presence of an ongoing acute complication of the disease (i.e. hepatic encephalopathy [grade III or IV])
  6. Conditions with a high risk of haemorrhage, including haemorrhagic diathesis not related to liver disease
  7. Patients with INR > 3.0
  8. Severe thrombocytopenia (<30x10 9 /L)
  9. Ongoing chronic anticoagulation therapy or indication for starting anticoagulation due to hepatic and non-hepatic conditions
  10. Ongoing anti-platelets therapy.
  11. Active malignancy (except for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria or non-melanocytic skin cancer)
  12. Antiviral treatment for hepatitis C, B and delta initiated in the last 6 months or planned to be initiated in the following 6 months
  13. Ongoing alcohol use disorder with an expected low adherence to protocol as judged by physician
  14. Previous liver transplantation
  15. Patients with TIPS or other surgical porto-caval shunts
  16. Chronic organic renal failure stage IV and V or estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate <30 ml/min according to the MDRD equations
  17. Chronic heart failure NYHA class III or IV
  18. Pulmonary disease GOLD III or IV
  19. Patients with extrahepatic diseases with life expectancy <6 months
  20. Severe psychiatric disorders
  21. Hypersensitivity to albumin preparations or to any of the excipients.
  22. Hypersensitivity to enoxaparin sodium, heparin or its derivatives, including other low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) or to any of the excipients
  23. History of immune mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) within the past 100 days or in the presence of circulating antibodies
  24. Pregnancy and breast-feeding
  25. Expected low adherence to study protocol as judged by physician
  26. Patients who can't provide written informed consent or refusal to participate
  27. Participation in other concurrent clinical trials and within the prior 3 months from informed consent signature.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Enoxaparin plus human albumin
Cohort 1 will receive standard medical treatment plus a combinatorial therapy of enoxaparin and human Albumin.

Human albumin solution is made from pooled human plasma. It is widely used as a plasma-expander in several disease conditions, such as liver cirrhosis and critically ill patients.

ATC-Code: B05AA01

Enoxaparin is a drug that belongs to the group of anticoagulants. It exerts its antithrombotic activity by binding to antithrombin III (AT III). ATC-Code: B01AB05
SMT will be considered non-study medication and is not specified in the protocol.
Active Comparator: Standard medical treatment
Cohort 2 (control) will receive only standard medical treatment.
SMT will be considered non-study medication and is not specified in the protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the safety and tolerability of the combinatorial therapy in terms of TEAE (pulmonary edema, major bleeding and/or thrombocytopenia
Time Frame: from baseline to Day 90
The safety and tolerability of the combinatorial therapy of human albumin and enoxaparin on top of SMT compared to SMT alone, from baseline to Day 90, will be evaluated as the percentage of subjects who discontinued the study drug due to at least 1 of the following treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE): pulmonary edema, severe thrombocytopenia and/or major bleeding. These variables will be described (counts and percentage).
from baseline to Day 90

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
90 and 180-days changes in prognostic scores of CLIF-Consortium Acute Decompensation score (CLIF-C AD) from baseline.
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline
Lower scores of CLIF-C AD (<45) indicate a better prognostic than greater values (>50). In the statistical analysis Chi-Square test or Fisher exact test will be performed. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.
90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in prognostic scores of Mayo End stage Liver Disease (MELD) from baseline.
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

The MELD score ranges from six to 40 and is based on results from several lab tests. The higher the number, the more likely you are to receive a liver from a deceased donor when an organ becomes available.

Chi-Square test or Fisher exact test will be performed. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in prognostic scores of Mayo End stage Liver Disease - sodio (MELDNa) from baseline
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

The MELDNa score ranges from six to 40 and is based on results from several lab tests. The higher the number, the more likely you are to receive a liver from a deceased donor when an organ becomes available.

Chi-Square test or Fisher exact test will be performed. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
30 days, 90 and 180-days incidence of hospital readmission and ICU admission (causes and length of stay)
Time Frame: 30, 90 and 180-days
Chi-Square test or Fisher exact test will be performed. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.
30, 90 and 180-days
90 and 180-days incidence of ACLF according to the EASL-CLIF criteria
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline
Chi-Square test or Fisher exact test will be performed. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.
90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days overall and transplant-free survival
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline
Overall and transplant-free survival will be analyzed by estimating Kaplan-Meier survival curves for each treatment arm. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.
90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days incidence and cumulative number of therapeutic paracenteses
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline
Chi-Square test or Fisher exact test will be performed. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.
90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days incidence of major complication of cirrhosis (grade 2-4 HE, portalhypertensive gastrointestinal bleedings, AKI, HRS-AKI, new-onset portal vein thrombosis)
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline
Chi-Square test or Fisher exact test will be performed. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.
90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days incidence of proven bacterial infection
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline
Chi-Square test or Fisher exact test will be performed. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.
90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: liver function variables: grade of ascites
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Grade of ascites according to the criteria of the International Club of Ascites.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: liver function variables: grade of hepatic encephalopathy (West Haven)
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Grade of hepatic encephalopathy using the West Haven (score range 0, normal to 4, coma).

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: liver function variables: grade of hepatic encephalopathy (ANT)
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Animal Naming Test (ANT): range from >15, normal to <10

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: liver function variables: bilirrubin
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Bilirubin in mg/dL. Ranges according reference ranges of each study site.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: liver function variables: albumin serum levels
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Albumin serum levels in g/dL. Ranges according reference ranges of each study site.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: renal function variables: BUN
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

BUN in mg/dL. Ranges according reference ranges of each study site.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: renal function variables: serum creatinine
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Serum creatinine in mg/dL. Ranges according reference ranges of each study site.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: renal function variables: electrolites
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Electrolytes: Na, K, Ca (mmol/L). Ranges according reference ranges of each study site.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: renal function variables: GFR
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Glomerula Filtration Ratio (GFR) will be estimated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: lung function variables: respiratory rate
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Respiratory rate in breaths per minute. Ranges according reference ranges of each study site.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: lung function variables: FIO2
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) in percentage (%). Ranges according reference ranges of each study site.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: lung function variables: pulse oxymetric saturation
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Pulse oxymetric saturation in percentage (%). Ranges according reference ranges of each study site.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: coagulative variables: INR
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

International Normalized Ratio (INR). Ranges according reference ranges of each study site.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: coagulative variables: aPTT
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in seconds. Ranges according reference ranges of each study site.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: coagulative variables: fibrinogen
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Fibrinogen in mg/dL. Ranges according reference ranges of each study site.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: coagulative variables: Platelet count
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Platelet count in platelets per microliter. Ranges according reference ranges of each study site.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: hemodynamic variables: arterial pressure
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure in mmHg. Ranges according reference ranges of each study site.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in organ function from baseline: hemodynamic variables: heart rate.
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

Heart rate in beats per minute. Ranges according reference ranges of each study site.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in frailty (Liver Frailty Index, LFI)
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

LFI score of ≤ 3.2 indicates a patient is robust, 3.3-4.4 pre frail and ≥ 4.5 frail.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in quality of life measure through European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Levels (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

EQ-5D-5L has a score from 5 (no problems) to 25 (extreme problems on all dimensions evaluated).

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
90 and 180-days changes in quality of life measure through Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 90 and 180-days from baseline

VAS has a score from 0 (worst health patient can imagine) to 100 (best health patient can imagine)

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

90 and 180-days from baseline
Total hospital costs during the 6-month period
Time Frame: 180-days from baseline

To estimate the 90-days costs of an acute decompensation of cirrhosis for both arms in the trial

In-hospital resource utilization will be described based on diagnosis and procedural codes and length of stay. Hospital costs will be assigned based on the primary indication for hospitalization and procedures performed during the hospitalization and the Severity-Diagnosis Related Groups. Costs will be then assigned based on the latest mean cost available.

Costs will be calculated in euros by treatment arm.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

180-days from baseline
Total hospital costs predictors during the 6-month period
Time Frame: 180-days from baseline

To identify cost predictors (patients characteristics that are present before the treatment is initiated) and

In-hospital resource utilization will be described based on diagnosis and procedural codes and length of stay. Hospital costs will be assigned based on the primary indication for hospitalization and procedures performed during the hospitalization and the Severity-Diagnosis Related Groups. Costs will be then assigned based on the latest mean cost available.

Costs will be calculated in euros by treatment arm.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

180-days from baseline
Total hospital costs drivers during the 6-month period cost drivers
Time Frame: 180-days from baseline

Cost drivers (response to treatment, randomization arm, other treatments).

In-hospital resource utilization will be described based on diagnosis and procedural codes and length of stay. Hospital costs will be assigned based on the primary indication for hospitalization and procedures performed during the hospitalization and the Severity-Diagnosis Related Groups. Costs will be then assigned based on the latest mean cost available.

Costs will be calculated in euros by treatment arm.

Student t-test or analysis of variance will be used to compare normally distributed variable or non-parametric methods if the assumptions of normality are not met. Pairwise Log-rank tests will be used for statistical comparisons.

180-days from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Only aggregated data will be shared among sites.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Cirrhosis

Clinical Trials on Human albumin

Subscribe