A Multiple Ascending Doses (MAD) Study of PMG1015 in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Subjects

November 19, 2025 updated by: Pulmongene Ltd.

A Phase 1b, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of PMG1015 in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) Subjects

This is a phase 1b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending doses (MAD) study of PMG1015 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) subjects. This study aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of PMG1015 after MAD.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230000
        • The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100029
        • China-Japan Friendship Hospital
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510120
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430030
        • Tongji Hospital Tongji Medical College Of Hust
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210008
        • Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital
    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200433
        • Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200030
        • Shanghai Chest Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of IPF as defined by current American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS)/Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS)/Latin American Thoracic Association (ALAT) Clinical Practice Guidelines for IPF (2022) (Pathological examination refers to transbronchial lung cryobiopsy or surgical/pleuroscopic lung biopsy);
  2. Forced vital capacity percent predicted (FVCpp) ≥45% at screening;
  3. Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO; corrected for haemoglobin) from 30% to 90% of the predicted, inclusive at screening;
  4. Subjects not receiving any approved IPF treatment (pirfenidone or nintedanib) within 1 month before enrollment for any reasons

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with instable condition of IPF as assessed by the investigator at screening, and those with acute exacerbation of IPF during screening or within 3 months prior to randomization;
  2. Patients who are likely to be lung transplant recipients within 6 months or expected to survive less than 1 year as assessed by the investigator at screening;
  3. Patients accompanying with an interstitial lung disease other than IPF;
  4. Patients accompanying with other types of respiratory disorders, which may affect the study results as assessed by the investigator;
  5. Patients who received vasodilator therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension (e.g. Bosentan) within 1 month prior to screening;
  6. Patients accompanying with other uncontrolled underlying diseases, for which the patient is not considered suitable for the study as assessed by the investigator;
  7. Patients who had active tuberculosis within 12 months prior to screening, or clinical symptoms of bacterial, viral, fungal or microbial infections requiring intervention within 4 weeks prior to randomization;
  8. Patients who have known allergic reaction to the investigational product or its active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), or history of allergic reaction to human, humanized, chimeric, or murine monoclonal antibodies or any substances contained in the excipients;
  9. Pregnant or lactating women; female subjects who plan to become pregnant during the study, or patients who are not willing to take contraceptive measures as required by the protocol during the study;
  10. Other conditions that preclude the patient from participating in the study as assessed by the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Comparator
Including 2 dose levels corresponding to PMG1015 level 1 and level 2, with no placebo group set for PMG1015 level 3
Experimental: PMG1015
Including 3 dose levels: level 1, level 2 and level 3

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
An Adverse Event (AE) is any event, side-effect or any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. TEAEs are AEs that occur following the start of treatment.
Approximately 170 days.
The severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
Severity of TEAEs (Grade 1 to 5) will be assessed based on NCI-CTCAE V5.0.
Approximately 170 days.
The incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an AE occurring during any study phase and at any dose of medicinal product that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Approximately 170 days.
The severity of serious adverse events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an AE occurring during any study phase and at any dose of medicinal product that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Approximately 170 days.
Assessment of pulmonary function test results-forced vital capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
Pulmonary function test is a test to explore the functional status of human respiratory system with the knowledge of exercise respiratory physiology and modern examination technology. Forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL) will be measured at Visits 1, 8, 14 and 16, to assess the changes in FVC from baseline to post-dose.
Approximately 170 days.
Assessment of pulmonary function test results-forced vital capacity percent predicted (FVCpp)
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
Pulmonary function test is a test to explore the functional status of human respiratory system with the knowledge of exercise respiratory physiology and modern examination technology. Forced vital capacity percent predicted (FVCpp) (%) will be measured at Visits 1, 8, 14 and 16, to assess the changes in FVCpp from baseline to post-dose.
Approximately 170 days.
Assessment of pulmonary function test results-forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
Pulmonary function test is a test to explore the functional status of human respiratory system with the knowledge of exercise respiratory physiology and modern examination technology. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (L) will be measured at Visits 1, 8, 14 and 16, to assess the changes in FEV1 from baseline to post-dose.
Approximately 170 days.
Assessment of pulmonary function test results-diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO)
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
Pulmonary function test is a test to explore the functional status of human respiratory system with the knowledge of exercise respiratory physiology and modern examination technology. Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (mL/min/mmHg) will be measured at Visits 1, 8, 14 and 16, to assess the changes in DLCO from baseline to post-dose.
Approximately 170 days.
Assessment of pulmonary function test results-diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide percent predicted (DLCOpp)
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
Pulmonary function test is a test to explore the functional status of human respiratory system with the knowledge of exercise respiratory physiology and modern examination technology. Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide percent predicted (DLCOpp) (DLCO%) will be measured at Visits 1, 8, 14 and 16, to assess the changes in DLCOpp from baseline to post-dose.
Approximately 170 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the area under the serum drug concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable time point (AUC0-t) of PMG1015.
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
AUC is a pharmacokinetic parameter that represents the concentration of a drug in the blood at a certain time.
Approximately 170 days.
Evaluate the area under the serum drug concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) of PMG1015.
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
AUC is a pharmacokinetic parameter that represents the concentration of a drug in the blood at a certain time.
Approximately 170 days.
Evaluate the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of a dosing interval (AUC0-tau) of PMG1015.
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
AUC is a pharmacokinetic parameter that represents the concentration of a drug in the blood at a certain time.
Approximately 170 days.
Evaluate the maximum concentration (Cmax) of PMG1015.
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
Cmax refers to the highest concentration of a drug in the blood after administration, which is related to the dose, route of administration, dosing frequency, and time to reach the peak concentration.
Approximately 170 days.
Evaluate the time to reach the maximum concentration (Tmax) of PMG1015.
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
Tmax refers to the time when a drug reaches its maximum concentration and exhibits its maximum effect in the body.
Approximately 170 days.
Evaluate the half-life (t1/2) of PMG1015.
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
t1/2 refers to the time required for the drug concentration in the blood to decrease by half.
Approximately 170 days.
Evaluate the clearance rate (CL) of PMG1015.
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
CL is the volume of blood that is completely cleared of a drug per unit time by the excretory organs, and its unit is usually mL·(min·kg)-1 or L·(h·kg)-1.
Approximately 170 days.
Evaluate the distribution volume (Vz) of PMG1015.
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
Vz is a pharmacokinetic parameter that reflects the extent of drug distribution in various tissues in the body.
Approximately 170 days.
Evaluate the elimination rate constant (λz) of PMG1015.
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
λz is referred to as the elimination rate constant, which is defined as the ratio of the amount of compound eliminated per unit time to the total amount, with its unit being the reciprocal of time.
Approximately 170 days.
Incidence of PMG1015-induced and PMG1015-boosted ADAs.
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
Immunogenicity assessment is mainly based on anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), including the incidence of PMG1015-induced and PMG1015-boosted ADAs.
Approximately 170 days.
Correlation between the dose and exposure.
Time Frame: Approximately 170 days.
Dose refers to the quantity of drug administered at one time to achieve the desired therapeutic effect, and it can vary depending on the patient's needs and medical condition.
Approximately 170 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wang, China-Japan Friendship Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Dai, China-Japan Friendship Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 19, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 7, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 7, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on IPF

Clinical Trials on PMG1015

Subscribe