Analgesic Effect of IntraPeritoneal LIGNOcaine in Gynaecological Open Surgery

November 30, 2023 updated by: University of Malaya

Analgesic Effect of IntraPeritoneal LIGNOcaine in Gynaecological Open Surgery: A Double-blinded Randomised Placebo-controlled Trial (IP LIGNO Trial)

The incidence of postoperative pain is highly prevalent among surgical patients. Inadequate postoperative pain control can slow the recovery and it increases the risk of postoperative complications, namely lung collapse and chronic pain. Although morphine is the one of the gold standard analgesia option for postoperative pain, it comes with many unwanted adverse effects, such as severe nausea and vomiting, low blood pressure and dizziness. Thus, multimodal analgesia regime, including local anaesthetic (lignocaine) is strongly advocated for postoperative analgesia.

The normal route of lignocaine is injected into vein for the properties of analgesia and anti-inflammatory. It exerts its effect via the systemic absorption of drugs to block the central neuronal pain transmission. In recent years, studies have demonstrated that instillation of lignocaine inside abdominal cavity can reduce internal organ pain by blocking free nerve ending inside abdomen with minimal systemic absorption of drug and lower complications of systemic toxicity of local anaesthesia as compared to the intravenous route of lignocaine.

Several RCTs showed the beneficial effect of intraperitoneal lignocaine for the reduction of postoperative visceral pain after laparoscopic surgery. However, gynaecological open surgery (cystectomy, hysterectomy) involves greater degree of manipulation and trauma on the internal organs with greater visceral pain, resulting in longer duration of hospitalisation and delayed functional mobility recovery. It is believed that the intraperitoneal lignocaine reduces inflammatory response after surgery and exert analgesia effect by blocking the neural signal transmission at site of tissue injury. Therefore, it is important to conduct this study to examine the analgesic effect of intraperitoneal lignocaine in women undergoing gynaecological open surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Postoperative pain impedes the progress of recovery and increases the risk of postoperative complications, namely lung atelectasis, incidence of desaturation, pulmonary dysfunction and chronic pain. Although opioid is the one of the gold standard analgesia for postoperative pain, it comes with many unwanted adverse effects, such as respiratory depression, hypotension and incidence of nausea and vomiting. Thus, multimodal analgesia regime, including local anaesthetic is strongly advocated for postoperative analgesia.

Lignocaine is a local anaesthetic agent, which has the properties of analgesia, anti-inflammatory and anti-arrhythmia effect via the blockade of sodium channel receptor in the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia. The intravenous lignocaine exerts its effect via the systemic absorption of drugs to block the central neuronal transmission. In recent years, studies have demonstrated that intraperitoneal route of lignocaine can reduce visceral pain by inhibiting peritoneal free nerve ending and reduce peripheral neuronal hyper-excitatory of pain signal transmission. It is also believed that intraperitoneal lignocaine is associated with minimal systemic absorption of drug and lower incidence of systemic toxicity local anaesthesia as compared to the intravenous route of lignocaine.

Several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) showed the beneficial effect of intraperitoneal lignocaine for the reduction of postoperative visceral pain after laparoscopic surgery. However, gynaecological open surgery has greater degree of organ manipulation and tissue injury with greater visceral pain, resulting in longer duration of hospitalisation and delayed functional mobility recovery. It is believed that the intraperitoneal lignocaine reduces inflammatory response after surgery and exert analgesia effect by blocking the neural pain signal transmission at site of tissue injury. The dosage of intraperitoneal lignocaine used in the literature ranged from 200-400mg. The serum concentration of intraperitoneal lignocaine was measured, which was associated with a relatively safe serum concentration of lignocaine. Pharmacological studies have showed that the adjuvant dose of adrenaline reduced the systematic absorption of intraperitoneal lignocaine. Therefore, this study is designed to examine the analgesic effect of intraperitoneal lignocaine in gynaecological open surgery. The investigators hypothesised that intraperitoneal lignocaine reduces postoperative pain score at rest and movement in women undergoing gynaecological open surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

112

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 50603
        • Recruiting
        • University of Malaya
        • Contact:
          • Ka Ting Ng, MBChB
          • Phone Number: +60379492042
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ka Ting Ng, MBChB
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pui San Loh, MBBS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all adult women (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) who >18 years old and <60 years old
  • gynaecological open surgery with midline or transverse laparotomy incision (below or above umbilicus)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • laparoscopic surgery
  • allergic to lignocaine
  • history of cardiac, vascular or liver disease
  • ASA 3-5 or
  • body mass index <18/ or >40

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group L
Intraperitoneal lignocaine 200mg/20mls + epinephrine 1:200,000
Intraperitoneal lignocaine 200mg/20mls + epinephrine 1:200,000
Other Names:
  • INJECSOL LIG2
Placebo Comparator: Group P
Intraperitoneal 20ml of 0.9% normal saline
Intraperitoneal 20ml of 0.9% normal saline
Other Names:
  • B. Braun 0.9% Sodium Chloride Inj. B.P

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain score
Time Frame: 1-hour after surgery in the recovery bay
At rest and movement (0- no pain, 10- most pain)
1-hour after surgery in the recovery bay
Postoperative pain score
Time Frame: 24-hour after surgery in the ward
At rest and movement (0- no pain, 10- most pain)
24-hour after surgery in the ward
Postoperative pain score
Time Frame: 48-hour after surgery in the ward
At rest and movement (0- no pain, 10- most pain)
48-hour after surgery in the ward

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia morphine consumption
Time Frame: 24-hour after surgery in the ward
Measured in milligrams
24-hour after surgery in the ward
Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia morphine consumption
Time Frame: 48-hour after surgery in the ward
Measured in milligrams
48-hour after surgery in the ward
Number of patients requiring rescue analgesia
Time Frame: Throughout in recovery bay after surgery, on average 2-hour after surgery
Number of patients
Throughout in recovery bay after surgery, on average 2-hour after surgery
Postoperative nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: Throughout in the recovery bay after surgery, on average 2-hour after surgery
Number of patients
Throughout in the recovery bay after surgery, on average 2-hour after surgery
Adverse events of lignocaine
Time Frame: Throughout the study completion, on average of 48 hours
Central nervous system or cardiovascular side effects- arrhythmias, dizziness or numbness
Throughout the study completion, on average of 48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pui San Loh, MBBS, University of Malaya
  • Principal Investigator: Ka Ting Ng, MBChB, University of Malaya

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 22, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Lignocaine

3
Subscribe