Evaluate the Accuracy of Raman IVD Analyzer in the Diagnosis of Gliomas During Surgery

June 4, 2023 updated by: Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Raman IVD Analyzer for Intraoperative Glioma Diagnosis, Using Samples From Brain Resection Tissue (Prospective, Multicenter, Blind Evaluation, Single Group Target Value Method)

Compare the data obtained from the Raman analyzer and paraffin pathology examination on the same external brain tissue sample. Evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Raman analyzer for intraoperative diagnosis gliomas of brain resection tissue samples, using paraffin pathological examination results as clinical reference standards.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Based on statistical calculations,108 positive samples and 148 negative samples will be included in the trial in all trial centers. Compare the results between the Raman analyzer and the paraffin pathological. And calculate the sensitivity, the specificity, and other indicators of Raman analyzer.

During surgery, core or marginal tissue samples were taken from subjects. The test samples size:0.2cm<length diameter ≤ 2cm. The sample testing result is based on the Raman test points. Then take the same tissue sample for paraffin pathological diagnosis.

Statistical description of all data, including baseline data, all efficacy indicators, and all safety data. The measurement data give the mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, median,25 quantile and 75 quantile; Provide frequency and composition ratio for counting data. The baseline data was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS); The effectiveness analysis adopts FAS and PPS; The security analysis uses the Security Dataset (SS).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

256

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old, regardless of gender;
  • Patients who plan to undergo brain lesion tissue resection surgery or have preoperative clinical diagnosis of gliomas and plan to undergo biopsy;
  • Patients with clinical diagnosis of initial solitary gliomas, or initial solitary intracranial masses or initial non occupying lesions that do not exclude gliomas (such as intracranial metastatic lesions, intracranial infectious lesions, intracranial demyelinating lesions, central nervous system lymphoma, etc.), who have not received radiotherapy or chemotherapy in the past based on their medical history;
  • The patient or their guardian can understand the research purpose, demonstrate sufficient compliance with the trial protocol, and sign an informed consent form;
  • It is possible to obtain tissue samples with a length diameter greater than 0.2cm. Patients diagnosed with initial solitary glioma should take core or marginal tissue, while patients diagnosed with initial single intracranial mass or initial non mass lesions but maybe with gliomas should be taken core tissue.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Investigator judge that it is not suitable for inclusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Perform two different tests on the same sample
The same sample is diagnosed using a Raman analyzer firstly and then diagnosed by paraffin pathology.
Perform two diagnostic methods on the same sample
Other Names:
  • Raman analyzer diagnosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of the Raman analyzer in detecting gliomar
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Among the samples determined by paraffin pathology as gliomas, the percentage of samples detected by Raman analyzer as gliomas.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Specificity of the Raman analyzer in detecting gliomar
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Among the samples determined by paraffin pathology as non gliomas, the percentage of samples detected by the Raman analyzer as non gliomas.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Using the paraffin test results as a reference, calculate the accuracy of the Raman analyzer in detecting gliomar
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
The proportion of tissue samples with consistent results between Raman analyzer detection and paraffin pathological diagnosis.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Positive predictive value of the Raman analyzer in detecting gliomar
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
The percentage of samples diagnosed with glioma by paraffin pathology in the samples detected as glioma by Raman analyzer
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Negative predictive value of Raman analyzer in detecting gliomar
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
The percentage of samples diagnosed with non glioma by paraffin pathology in the samples detected as non glioma by Raman analyzer
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Kappa coefficient
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Kappa coefficient≥0.75 indicates high consistency; 0.75>Kappa coefficient≥0.4, considered consistent; If the Kappa coefficient is less than 0.4, it is considered inconsistent.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
The Raman analyzer usability evaluation
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Use Evaluation Form
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Time consumption for the Raman analyzer in detecting gliomar
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Time required from emitting laser to completing single point detection
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The defect occurrence rate of the Raman analyzer
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
The proportion of subjects with defects in the Raman analyzer during normal use to the total number of subjects using the Raman analyzer
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Adverse Event Incidence Rate
Time Frame: During the surgery
Number of subjects with AE/total number of subjects ×100%
During the surgery
Serious Adverse Event Incidence Rate
Time Frame: During the surgery
Number of subjects with SAE/total number of subjects ×100%
During the surgery
Operator adverse events
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Possible damage to device operators during the use and maintenance of the Raman analyzers
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tao Jiang, MD and PhD, Beijing Tiantan Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Qing Mao, West China Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Dongming Yan, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
  • Principal Investigator: Shouwei Li, Capital Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glioma

Clinical Trials on Paraffin pathological diagnosis

Subscribe