A Prospective Study of Natural History and Clinical Outcomes for Basilar Invagination

June 11, 2023 updated by: Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
A Prospective Study of Natural History and Clinical Outcomes for Basilar Invagination

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Detailed Description

Since basilar invagination was reported, its pathogenesis has been considered both primary and secondary. Surgical treatment methods emerged in an endless stream, and a hundred schools of thought contend. However, the link between the symptoms and imaging has not been studied in detail. We prospectively enrolled patients with basilar depression, and then explored the natural history of the disease and the clinical outcomes of early intervention.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100053
        • Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with primary basilar depression

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. BI discovered by the patient not incidentally;
  2. Patients with depression of the skull base caused by congenital skeletal developmental malformations and symptoms;
  3. The patient was initially treated in our center, and the interval between onset and treatment was at least 1 month or no treatment;
  4. The imaging diagnosis of BI meets the standard (3-5mm higher than the Chamberlain's line)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. secondary BI caused by trauma, pathological factors such as rheumatoid arthritis, hyperparathyroidism, osteogenesis imperfecta, rickets, osteomalacia, spinal cord tumors, tuberculosis, inflammation of adjacent structures, and simple AAD, odontoid body deformity, etc.
  2. spinal vascular disease, intervertebral disc herniation, tethered spinal cord disease and other diseases that may cause symptoms.
  3. Patients with incomplete imaging data or symptomatic data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Goel A Type Basilar Invagination
1) ADI>3mm in adults, or ADI>5mm in child.
With the patient in prone position, cervical traction was only intraoperatively after anesthesia with weights of approximately 5-8 kg during surgery. Monitoring of the spinal cord with motor evoked potential and somatosensory evoked potential were used throughout the surgery. Using a posterior midline incision, the occiput to the C2 spinous process was surgically exposed, separated to the lateral edge of the C1-2 joint, and cut off at the C2 nerve root to expose the C1-2 articular surface Quantitative reduction techniques included the following steps .1) Facet joint release and cage implantation technique 2)Adjusting POCA by cantilever and occipitocervical fixation technique.
Goel B Type Basilar Invagination
  1. ADI<3mm in adults, or ADI<5mm in child.
  2. The stabilization in atlantoaxial could can be found.
  3. The tip of odontoid can exceed the Chamberlian's line, but not exceed the Wackenheim's line and Mcrae's line.
With the patient in prone position, cervical traction was only intraoperatively after anesthesia with weights of approximately 5-8 kg during surgery. Monitoring of the spinal cord with motor evoked potential and somatosensory evoked potential were used throughout the surgery. Using a posterior midline incision, the occiput to the C2 spinous process was surgically exposed, separated to the lateral edge of the C1-2 joint, and cut off at the C2 nerve root to expose the C1-2 articular surface Quantitative reduction techniques included the following steps .1) Facet joint release and cage implantation technique 2)Adjusting POCA by cantilever and occipitocervical fixation technique.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
improved symptoms
Time Frame: 1 months postoperatively
The symptoms improved after the opration or natural condition.(JOA scores and SF-12 scores)
1 months postoperatively
improved symptoms
Time Frame: 3 months postoperatively
The symptoms improved after the opration or natural condition.(JOA scores and SF-12 scores)
3 months postoperatively
improved symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
The symptoms improved after the opration or natural condition.(JOA scores and SF-12 scores)
6 months postoperatively
improved radiology
Time Frame: 1 months postoperatively
improved ADI, CCA, CTA ; The basilar invagination reduced
1 months postoperatively
improved radiology
Time Frame: 3 months postoperatively
improved ADI, CCA, CTA ; The basilar invagination reduced
3 months postoperatively
improved radiology
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
improved ADI, CCA, CTA ; The basilar invagination reduced
6 months postoperatively
operation complication
Time Frame: 1 months postoperatively
operation complication(Excessive bleeding, bronchopneumonia, vertebral artery injury )
1 months postoperatively
operation complication
Time Frame: 3 months postoperatively
operation complication(Excessive bleeding, bronchopneumonia, vertebral artery injury )
3 months postoperatively
operation complication
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
operation complication(Excessive bleeding, bronchopneumonia, vertebral artery injury )
6 months postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zan Chen, MD. PHD., Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 6, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

June 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Basilar Invagination

Clinical Trials on Posterior facet distraction and fusion

3
Subscribe