Prospective Data Collection on Clinical, Radiological and Patient Reported Outcomes After Pleural Intervention (PROSPECT)

June 8, 2023 updated by: University of Oxford
The PROSPECT study aims to look at the number of problems or side effects which occur after patients have had a procedure completed to remove fluid or air from the space between the lung and the chest wall. Other information will also be collected to see whether anything else affects which patients have problems after the procedure such as bleeding or infection. This study will also investigate whether it is possible to find out which patients are likely to feel a lot better after the procedure. Not all patients feel significantly better but it is not clear why this is. There are a number of different reasons patients may not feel better, for example if the lung is not able to fully re-expand. The study aims to look at whether it is possible to predict these problems before the procedure using ultrasound. If it is possible to find the answers to some of these questions it might be possible to prevent patients undergoing treatments which are not likely to benefit them. The study will use information already collected as part of clinical care, as well as questionnaires from patients receiving care at a variety of centres. The different features of these centres will also be considered in analysis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PROSPECT is a prospective, observational study in which complications and key other data will be collected from patients undergoing pleural procedures. Data will include demographics, smoking history, pre-procedure observations, radiological findings and medical history along with information about the size of the service and range of procedures performed. Complications will be objectively defined, with baseline procedure information recorded, and at 1 month, all complications recorded according to specified criteria.

At least 20 centres will be approached to collect prospective data on pleural interventions and outcomes for patients who have undergone procedures in their service. All patients who have a pleural procedure for fluid will have an ultrasound as part of the procedure but due to a difference in expertise around the country, centres (and clinicians within each centre) will record ultrasound findings in varying degrees of detail. Centres will specify what level of detail they can provide and can opt to perform a more detailed assessment if skills permit and the patient agrees. Any patient can be included in the sub-study if there is sufficient time and sufficient expertise of the clinicians to perform and interpret the more detail scanning procedures.

Patients, who are willing, will also be asked to complete a visual analogue scale score for chest pain and breathlessness before and after their procedure and at a further time interval within 4 weeks. Any patients who are having an indwelling catheter inserted, or chest drain inserted for pleurodesis will be asked to complete an additional questionnaire.

The majority of centres will be those with an active pleural service and will include a combination of district general and tertiary referral centres. The data is likely to represent best practice but should also include the complex cases and interventions. In the future, the study is extendable to non-specialist centres to achieve similar reporting standards, mirroring current standards in other areas such as surgery. The data collected will provide a "best practice standard" against which new and smaller volume centres can benchmark practice, to ensure patient safety.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Oxfordshire
      • Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX3 7LE
        • Recruiting
        • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Najib Rahman

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

- Patients undergoing invasive pleural intervention in a variety of settings: day case procedure lists, pleural clinic, bedside

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged >18
  • Undergoing pleural intervention
  • Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aged <18
  • Unable to provide written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Undergoing pleural intervention
Any patient undergoing a pleural procedure (eg thoracocentesis, chest drain, indwelling pleural catheter, pleural biopsies, medical thoracoscopy)
eg thoracocentesis, chest drain, indwelling pleural catheters, thoracoscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications
Time Frame: within 30 days
Specifically: bleeding, infection, pneumothorax, organ injury, pain, re-expansion pulmonary oedema
within 30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient reported outcome measures of dyspnoea and chest pain
Time Frame: within 4 weeks
within 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Najib Rahman, DPhil, University of Oxford

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

June 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumothorax

Clinical Trials on Pleural interventions

Subscribe