Predicton of Sepsis Recovery Performance Subtypes Pilot Study

February 17, 2026 updated by: Peter Morris, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Prediction of Sepsis Recovery Physical Performance Subtypes: A Pilot Study

This study addresses critically ill sepsis patients' current literature reports of ongoing post-hospital discharge weakness and hospital readmissions. This study is aimed at capture and interpretation of a complex set of tests, administered during a subject's sepsis functional recovery trajectory, particularly capturing hospital readmission's effects on survivors' physical function recovery.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients with Sepsis who require ICU care, experience frequent weakness, physical dysfunction, fatigue, difficulty concentrating, poor memory, and mental morbidity that persists after hospital discharge. This syndromic pattern has been labeled as Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) or Post Sepsis Syndrome (PSS). These patients are at increased risk of rehospitalization (up to 40% at 6 months). Studies have pointed out that sepsis survivors recover within several different recovery patterns or trajectories. Unfortunately there are no objective biomarkers early in these patients' hospitalizations, to predict which physical function trajectory a sepsis survivor will experience. However, a very common, unifying symptom of sepsis survivors is weakness. The literature maintains that an intervention of exercise rehabilitation remains a safe and potential therapy for sepsis survivors. It is important to note that as of yet, there has been no benefit demonstrated when highly heterogeneously functioning survivors are included in studies of a uniform rehabilitation intervention. However, for the future designs of ICU and post-hospital ICU Survivor exercise-rehab trials, the field is in need of information on how to label sepsis patients by their predicted outpatient recovery trajectory group, and to be able to do so very proximally in their course, prior to hospital discharge. The intent of this study is to closely track and characterize physical function recovery trajectory groups as a means of informing strategies for effective future study design.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • Recruiting
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Sepsis requiring organ support in an ICU setting

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sepsis requiring organ support in an ICU setting

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. inability to obtain informed consent
  2. the attending physician reports that the patient's goals of care are transitioning to palliation/withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy
  3. recent cancer therapy in the last 12 months
  4. age >80
  5. plans to be discharged on mechanical ventilation to a Long Term Acute Care Hospital
  6. planned discharge to rehabilitation facility, long-term hospital or nursing home.
  7. Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short Performance Physical Battery
Time Frame: 3 months post hospital discharge
Physical function score
3 months post hospital discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: peter morris, md, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 11, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 15, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-300010502-003
  • CTSA (Other Grant/Funding Number: CTSA)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on there is no intervention

Subscribe