Hyperoxia on Ventilation During Recovery From General Anesthesia

March 9, 2024 updated by: Anthony Doufas, Stanford University

The Effect of Hyperoxia on Ventilation During Recovery From General Anesthesia: A Crossover Preliminary Investigation

In this preliminary, crossover investigation the investigators will examine the effect of oxygen supplementation on the recovery of breathing in the immediate post-anesthesia period.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In a pilot randomized-controlled trial (NCT04723433) the investigators found that, compared with standard O2 supplementation, hyperoxia enhanced ventilation, as estimated by the fraction of time at a transcutaneous PCO2 (TcPCO2) > 45 mmHg.

More specifically, patients treated with hyperoxia (O2 titrated to: SpO2 > 96%, N=10; Liberal O2) for 90 minutes post-anesthesia, spent 61.2% of the time at TcPCO2 > 45 mmHg, compared with 80.6% of the time in those receiving standard O2 supplementation (O2 titrated to: SpO2 between 90-94%, N=9; Conservative O2 - between-group difference of 19.4% (95% Confidence Intervals: -18.7% to 57.6%), ANCOVA adjusted P = 0.140]. Results were consistent across the 90-min monitoring period. With an observed effect size of 0.73, it was estimated that 30 participants per group are required, to demonstrate this difference with a power of 80% at a two-sided alpha of 5%.

In a follow-up RCT (IRB-63878, NCT05379673) in 18 patients the investigators found that over a 90-minute window, the average percentage of time spent at TcPCO2 > 45mmHg for patients in the Conservative O2 group (N=9) was 57.8% (52 ± 44 minutes), compared with a 45.6% (41 ± 46 minutes) for those in the Liberal O2 group (N=9), (P=0.6134; two-sided two sample t-test). In addition, during the same period, respiratory disturbance index (RDI; events per hour) was higher in the Conservative O2 [median (range): 23.9 (11.0-78.6)], compared with the Liberal O2 group [19.6 (2.8-40.4), Mann-Whitney test, P=0.1615].

Due to the high variability observed in the evaluated respiratory parameters (i.e., TcPCO2 and upper airway obstruction expressed by Respiratory Disturbance Index), the researchers believe that a crossover, rather than a randomized controlled trial, design would improve the power and efficiency of this investigation and also provide an opportunity to characterize better those patients who respond, and separate them from those who do not respond to hyperoxia treatment.

This preliminary investigation will assess how ventilation during recovery from general anesthesia is affected by conservative (Conservative O2: 90% ≤ SpO2 ≤ 94%), compared with liberal (Liberal O2: SpO2 > 96%) O2 supplementation. Using a crossover study design, the investigators aim to: a) assess the breathing pattern and estimate and compare the number of apnea/hypopnea episodes between the two interventions, and b) estimate and compare the cumulative segment of time during which the transcutaneous partial pressure of carbon dioxide (TcPCO2) will exceed 45 mmHg, between the two interventions.

Hypothesis: Conservative O2 will be associated with more unstable and obstructed breathing and less time spent with TcPCO2 > 45 mmHg, compared with Liberal O2 supplementation, during recovery from anesthesia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Body mass index (BMI) less than 35 kg/m2
  • Scheduled to undergo robotic-assisted radical laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), severe neurological, cardiopulmonary, psychiatric, or untreated thyroid disorder
  • Chronic pain condition that is being treated with opioids
  • Patients with a hematocrit lower than 30% at the end of surgery, or those with an excessive blood loss, requiring transfusion of blood products during surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: "Conservative O2"
During the first treatment session, which will last for 40 minutes, O2 supplementation will be titrated to an SpO2 between 90% and 94%.
Administration of Oxygen by inhalation
Experimental: "Liberal O2"
During the second treatment session, which will last for 40 minutes, O2 supplementation will be titrated to an SpO2 > 96%.
Administration of Oxygen by inhalation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory disturbance index (RDI)
Time Frame: Forty minutes of monitoring for each treatment arm
The number of apnea/hypopnea episodes detected using respiratory inductance plethysmography and nasal flow.
Forty minutes of monitoring for each treatment arm
Transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure (TcPCO2)
Time Frame: Forty minutes of monitoring for each treatment arm
The cumulative segment of time during which the transcutaneous partial pressure of carbon dioxide will exceed an upper limit of 45 mmHg (i.e., TcPCO2 > 45 mmHg)
Forty minutes of monitoring for each treatment arm

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anthony Doufas, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Stanford University Medical School

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 8, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 12, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 12, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventilatory Depression

Clinical Trials on Oxygen gas

Subscribe