Intubation of Obese Patients in the Operating Room With or Without Face Mask Ventilation (VENT OR NOT)

March 10, 2026 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Intubation of Obese Patients in the Operating Room With or Without Face Mask Ventilation. A Randomized Multicentre Study

The aim of the study is to answer a daily question in the operating room: what is the safest technique for intubation of severe/morbid obese patients (BMI 35 or more). There is a great heterogeneity of practices on the subject, so the principle is to determine a common practice to facilitate the management of these patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Anesthesia consultation or pre-anesthesia visit:

  • screening for inclusion and non-inclusion criteria
  • patient information
  • collection of consent
  • inclusion

D0 (day of inclusion):

  • before general anesthesia : collection of epidemiological data (history + clinical examinations) + randomization (Arm A/Not Vent : intubation without ventilation or Arm B/Vent : intubation with ventilation)
  • general anesthesia : intubation according to randomization arm + collection primary endpoint + conduct of the intubation procedure + morbidity of the intubation procedure
  • after general anesthesia : collection of secondary endpoints + conduct of the intubation procedure + morbidity of the intubation procedure + intraoperative respiratory morbidity
  • post-interventional care room : collection of clinical parameters in the ICU : postoperative morbidity + study discharge (hospital discharge)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

725

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Angers, France, 49933
        • Chu Angers
      • Brest, France, 29609
        • CHRU Brest
      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • CHU de Dijon
      • La Roche-sur-Yon, France, 85925
        • CHD Vendee
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • CHRU de Lille - Hopital Claude Huriez
      • Lyon, France
        • HCL - Hôpital Edouard Herriot
      • Nantes, France
        • CHU de Nantes - site Laennec
      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • CHU de Rennes
      • Saint-Nazaire, France, 44600
        • CH de Saint-Nazaire
      • Saint-Nazaire, France, 44600
        • Clinique Mutualiste de l'Estuaire
      • Toulouse, France, 31300
        • Chu Toulouse
      • Valenciennes, France
        • Ch de Valenciennes
    • Loire Atlantique
      • Nantes, Loire Atlantique, France, 44100
        • Chu Nantes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • patient requiring general anesthesia with intubation for surgery or scheduled endoscopic procedures
  • age > 18 years
  • with a BMI superior or equal to 35kg.m-²
  • patient having signed an informed consent

Non-inclusion criteria:

  • ambient air saturation <90%
  • urgent surgery < 24 hours
  • cardio-thoracic surgery
  • mask ventilation not possible (e.g. ATCD, cervical irradiation, fixed mandible)
  • formal contraindication to mask ventilation (e.g. occlusive syndrome, non fasting patient, symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux untreated or persistent under treatment)
  • wish of the operator for high flow oxygen preoxygenation
  • wish of an intubation without curare by the operator
  • pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • protected adults (guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice)
  • participation in another randomized clinical research study concerning preoxygenation and relevant to the primary endpoint
  • absence of affiliation to the French social security system

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Without ventilation
No ventilation sequence during the intubation period and without face mask ventilation during the apnea period
During the period of apnea (in general anesthesia), the patient did not help with face mask
Experimental: With ventilation
Sequence "with ventilation" during the apnea period with face mask ventilation
During the pperiod of apnea (in general anesthesia), the patient did help with face mask

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare the effectiveness of an intubation sequence "with ventilation during apnea" versus a sequence "without ventilation during apnea" in preventing complications related to intubation of the obese patient in the operating room
Time Frame: From induction of general anesthesia to 10 minutes after intubation
Comparison of the incidence of intubation-related complications. Complications identified for the primary endpoint will be: desaturations < 95%, need for 2 or more intubation attempts (including alternative technique), occurrence of inhalation/regurgitation or hypotension with systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg, with or without amine. Complications will be recorded from induction of general anesthesia to 10 minutes after intubation
From induction of general anesthesia to 10 minutes after intubation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on the progress of the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: During the general anesthesia, up to 8 hours
Difficulty with mask ventilation (yes/no)
During the general anesthesia, up to 8 hours
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on the progress of the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: During the general anesthesia, up to 10 minutes
Measure of the saturation before the first laryngoscopy with oximeter
During the general anesthesia, up to 10 minutes
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on the progress of the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: During the general anesthesia, up to 8 hours
Quality of exposure under laryngoscopy (position of the patient)
During the general anesthesia, up to 8 hours
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on the progress of the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: During the general anesthesia, up to 8 hours
Difficulties in intubation (yes/no)
During the general anesthesia, up to 8 hours
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on the progress of the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: During the general anesthesia, up to 8 hours
Description of intubation (mandrin, videolaryngoscope, videolaryngoscope)
During the general anesthesia, up to 8 hours
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on morbidity related to the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 8 hours
Rate of desaturation <80% (yes/no)
up to 8 hours
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on morbidity related to the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 8 hours
Rate of desaturation <90% (yes/no)
up to 8 hours
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on morbidity related to the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 8 hours
Presence of severe hypotension during intubation and in the following hour defined by a systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg, with or without amine (yes/no)
up to 8 hours
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on morbidity related to the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 8 hours
Number of participants with cardiac arrest
up to 8 hours
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on morbidity related to the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 8 hours
Death during intubation
up to 8 hours
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on morbidity related to the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 8 hours
Difficulties in intubations (yes/no) with the number of intubation attempts
up to 8 hours
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on morbidity related to the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 8 hours
Number of participants with cardiac rhythm disorders
up to 8 hours
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on morbidity related to the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 8 hours
Number of participants with esophageal intubations
up to 8 hours
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on morbidity related to the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 8 hours
Number of participants with regurgitation/inhalation
up to 8 hours
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on morbidity related to the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 8 hours
Number of participants with dental breaks
up to 8 hours
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on immediate intraoperative and postoperative respiratory morbidity between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: 5 minutes, 30 minutes and 1 hour after intubation
Need for FiO2 >50% during surgery to achieve >95% saturation (yes/no)
5 minutes, 30 minutes and 1 hour after intubation
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on immediate intraoperative and postoperative respiratory morbidity between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 28 days
Length of stay in the post-operation monitoring room
up to 28 days
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on immediate intraoperative and postoperative respiratory morbidity between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 28 days
Duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation(in minutes)
up to 28 days
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on immediate intraoperative and postoperative respiratory morbidity between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 28 days
Number of participants with nausea
up to 28 days
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on immediate intraoperative and postoperative respiratory morbidity between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 28 days
Number of participants with vomiting
up to 28 days
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on immediate intraoperative and postoperative respiratory morbidity between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 28 days
Length of hospitalization since randomization
up to 28 days
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on immediate intraoperative and postoperative respiratory morbidity between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: up to 28 days
Hospital discharge status (dead/alive)
up to 28 days
Impact of the nature of the intubation sequence on the progress of the intubation procedure between patient with face mask and patient without face mask
Time Frame: During the general anesthesia, up to 10 minutes
Measure of the lowest saturation during the intubation procedure and the following 10 minutes
During the general anesthesia, up to 10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mickael VOURC'H, PhD, Nantes University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 24, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

July 3, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Morbid Obesity

Clinical Trials on No ventilation with face mask

Subscribe