NEUROMARK Registry Study

March 17, 2026 updated by: Neurent Medical

Interventional Registry to Collect Real-World Evidence of the NEUROMARK System in Subjects With Chronic Rhinitis

The NEUROMARK Registry Study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, post-market, interventional registry study to collect real-world evidence of the NEUROMARK System in subjects with chronic rhinitis.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35242
        • Alabama Nasal & Sinus Center
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90006
        • Sensa Health
      • Roseville, California, United States, 95661
        • Sacramento ENT
    • Florida
      • Brandon, Florida, United States, 33511
        • Florida ENT & Allergy
    • Texas
      • McKinney, Texas, United States, 75071
        • ENT & Allergy Texas
    • Utah
      • Ogden, Utah, United States, 84403
        • Ogden Clinic
    • Virginia
      • Alexandria, Virginia, United States, 22310
        • Metropolitan ENT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subject MUST:

  1. Be ≥18 years of age.
  2. Be scheduled to receive treatment with the commercially available NEUROMARK System consistent with the device's indications for use.
  3. Have moderate to severe symptoms of running nose (individual rTNSS symptom rating of 2 or 3), mild to severe symptoms of nasal congestion (individual rTNSS symptom rating of 1, 2, or 3), and a minimum total score of 5 (out of 12) at screening.
  4. Be willing and able to provide consent and comply with all study elements, as indicated by written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects Must Not:

1. Have a history of chronic epistaxis or experienced a significant epistaxis event (defined as epistaxis requiring medical intervention) in the past 3 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: NEUROMARK Treatment
Interventional registry to collect real world data - Subjects will undergo treatment with the NEUROMARK System.
The NEUROMARK System is indicated for use in otorhinolaryngology (ENT) surgery for creation of radiofrequency (RF) lesions to disrupt posterior nasal nerves in patients with chronic rhinitis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety - incidence of device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse
Time Frame: 3-month follow-up
Safety, as assessed by the incidence of device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs).
3-month follow-up
Safety - incidence of device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
Safety, as assessed by the incidence of device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs).
6-month follow-up
Safety - incidence of device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse
Time Frame: 12-month follow-up
Safety, as assessed by the incidence of device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs).
12-month follow-up
Safety - incidence of device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse
Time Frame: 18-month follow-up
Safety, as assessed by the incidence of device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs).
18-month follow-up
Safety - incidence of device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse
Time Frame: 24-month follow-up
Safety, as assessed by the incidence of device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs).
24-month follow-up
Safety - incidence of device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse
Time Frame: 30-month follow-up
Safety, as assessed by the incidence of device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs).
30-month follow-up
Safety - incidence of device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse
Time Frame: 36-month follow-up
Safety, as assessed by the incidence of device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs).
36-month follow-up
Efficacy - reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)
Time Frame: 3-month follow-up
Efficacy, as assessed by the mean change from baseline in the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) total score at each follow-up
3-month follow-up
Efficacy - reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
Efficacy, as assessed by the mean change from baseline in the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) total score at each follow-up
6-month follow-up
Efficacy - reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)
Time Frame: 12-month follow-up
Efficacy, as assessed by the mean change from baseline in the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) total score at each follow-up
12-month follow-up
Efficacy - reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)
Time Frame: 18-month follow-up
Efficacy, as assessed by the mean change from baseline in the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) total score at each follow-up
18-month follow-up
Efficacy - reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)
Time Frame: 24-month follow-up
Efficacy, as assessed by the mean change from baseline in the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) total score at each follow-up
24-month follow-up
Efficacy - reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)
Time Frame: 30-month follow-up
Efficacy, as assessed by the mean change from baseline in the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) total score at each follow-up
30-month follow-up
Efficacy - reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)
Time Frame: 36-month follow-up
Efficacy, as assessed by the mean change from baseline in the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) total score at each follow-up
36-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Annalise Sorensen, Neurent Medical

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Rhinitis

Clinical Trials on NEUROMARK System

Subscribe