Battlefield Auricular Acupressure (BAApress) Feasibility Study

June 30, 2025 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Battlefield Auricular Acupressure (BAApress) for Emergency Department Observation Psychiatric Patients With Co-occurring Chronic and Acute Pain Management

The purpose of this research study is to find out what effects (good and bad) acupressure applied to the outside of the ear (Auricular Acupressure), in addition to the standard of care medication regimen, will have on pain. This study is being done to assess whether acupressure in addition to prescribed pain medication may be of benefit in decreasing pain levels and improving overall wellbeing. This study will also evaluate the feasibility of routinely offering acupressure to patients having pain issues in addition to a psychiatric diagnosis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of Emergency Department nurse-initiated battlefield auricular acupressure as an adjunct to medication for pain management for psychiatric Emergency Department Observation patients.

The Battlefield Auricula Acupressure interventionists (nurse) will complete Auricular training modules and complete competency assessments and intervention assessments throughout the study. Study interventionist will include the possibility that a study participant may be part of a competency assessment and that their session may be recorded and securely uploaded to a server per Institutional Review Board (IRB) and institutional policies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28105
        • Atrium Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring admission to psychiatric emergency room who also have documented chronic or acute pain
  • History of chronic or acute pain with or without opioid use disorder
  • Expected length of stay at least 2-3 days at the time of recruitment
  • Able to read and understand the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Since this is a feasibility pilot, only English-speaking participants will be eligible.
  • Cognitive impairment (Intellectual Disability Disorder or Dementia)
  • Patients who have a legal guardian
  • Participants with a history of skin disease (e.g., psoriasis) involving the ear, adhesive allergy, recent scar tissue on ear, or current abrasions or cuts on ear,
  • Use of some types of hearing aids (obstructing the placement of beads)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Auricular Acupressure Pad Group
All subjects who qualify and agree to be in the study will be given Auricular Acupressure using an acupressure pad containing acupressure seeds for 4 days in addition to their regular standard of care pain medication.
Pads containing seeds that are placed on specific sites of the ear that are thought to help with pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Reported Pain and General Activity Scores (Visual Analogue Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain is marked by subject on a line that ranges from 0mm to 100mm. The study team will measure where the participant marks to the nearest mm which will provide a score. Higher scores denote higher pain with higher levels of activity.
Baseline
Patient Reported Pain and General Activity Scores (Visual Analogue Scale)
Time Frame: Day 1
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain is marked by subject on a line that ranges from 0mm to 100mm. The study team will measure where the participant marks to the nearest mm which will provide a score. Higher scores denote higher pain with higher levels of activity.
Day 1
Patient Reported Pain and General Activity Scores (Visual Analogue Scale)
Time Frame: Day 2
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain is marked by subject on a line that ranges from 0mm to 100mm. The study team will measure where the participant marks to the nearest mm which will provide a score. Higher scores denote higher pain with higher levels of activity.
Day 2
Patient Reported Pain and General Activity Scores (Visual Analogue Scale)
Time Frame: Day 3
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain is marked by subject on a line that ranges from 0mm to 100mm. The study team will measure where the participant marks to the nearest mm which will provide a score. Higher scores denote higher pain with higher levels of activity.
Day 3
Pain Medication Usage
Time Frame: Day 1
Average milligram per day of a non-opioid analgesic.
Day 1
Pain Medication Usage
Time Frame: Day 2
Average milligram per day of a non-opioid analgesic.
Day 2
Pain Medication Usage
Time Frame: Day 3
Average milligram per day of a non-opioid analgesic.
Day 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Battlefield Auricular Acupressure (BAA) Press Question 1 - Count of Participants Somewhat Satisfied or Satisfied.
Time Frame: Day 3

Number responding to the following question will be recorded:

1. "How satisfied were you with how your pain has been treated?" using the Likert scale to measure "Very satisfied =5, Satisfied=4, Somewhat satisfied = 3, Somewhat dissatisfied= 2, Dissatisfied 1, Very Dissatisfied 0." Range 0-5 with higher score indicating higher satisfaction.

Day 3
Battlefield Auricular Acupressure (BAA) Press Question 2 - Count of Participants That Would Maybe Consider or Consider Intervention.
Time Frame: Day 3

Number responding to the following question will be recorded:

Would you consider using auricular acupressure in the future for pain or if recommended by your nurse or physician? a. No, would not use again (Score of 0) b. Maybe (Score of 1), c. Yes, I would consider using in the future (Score of 2).

Day 3
BAA Press Placement Survey (Interventionists Only) - Mean Time of Acupressure Seed Placement
Time Frame: Day 1
The Interventionist (Acupressure nurse) will be asked to capture time related to completion of study tasks and other qualitative questions to assess overall feasibility. Time recorded in minutes.
Day 1
General Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Baseline

GAD-7 is a 7 item scale to identify Generalized Anxiety Disorder symptoms of evaluation. Patients are asked to rate anxiety symptoms on a scale of 0-3. Total score ranges from 0-21. Higher scores indicate increased severity of anxiety.

7 item scale to identify Generalized Anxiety Disorder symptoms of evaluation. Patients are asked to rate anxiety symptoms on a scale of 0-3. Total score ranges from 0-21. Higher scores indicate increased severity of anxiety

Baseline
General Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Day 1

GAD-7 is a 7 item scale to identify Generalized Anxiety Disorder symptoms of evaluation. Patients are asked to rate anxiety symptoms on a scale of 0-3. Total score ranges from 0-21. Higher scores indicate increased severity of anxiety.

7 item scale to identify Generalized Anxiety Disorder symptoms of evaluation. Patients are asked to rate anxiety symptoms on a scale of 0-3. Total score ranges from 0-21. Higher scores indicate increased severity of anxiety

Day 1
General Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Day 2

GAD-7 is a 7 item scale to identify Generalized Anxiety Disorder symptoms of evaluation. Patients are asked to rate anxiety symptoms on a scale of 0-3. Total score ranges from 0-21. Higher scores indicate increased severity of anxiety.

7 item scale to identify Generalized Anxiety Disorder symptoms of evaluation. Patients are asked to rate anxiety symptoms on a scale of 0-3. Total score ranges from 0-21. Higher scores indicate increased severity of anxiety

Day 2
General Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Day 3

GAD-7 is a 7 item scale to identify Generalized Anxiety Disorder symptoms of evaluation. Patients are asked to rate anxiety symptoms on a scale of 0-3. Total score ranges from 0-21. Higher scores indicate increased severity of anxiety.

7 item scale to identify Generalized Anxiety Disorder symptoms of evaluation. Patients are asked to rate anxiety symptoms on a scale of 0-3. Total score ranges from 0-21. Higher scores indicate increased severity of anxiety

Day 3

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Battlefield auricular acupressure (BAA) press question 3
Time Frame: Day 3
Three questions will be ask of evaluate acceptance of the intervention. Responses to the following will be analyzed qualitatively: 2. Would you consider using auricular acupressure in the future for pain or if recommended by your nurse or physician? a. No, would not use again (Score of 0) b. Maybe (Score of 1), c. Yes, I would consider using in the future (Score of 2). Will analyze with descriptive stats with percent responding to each answer. 3. Is there anything else you would like to tell us that may be helpful for us to know regarding ear acupressure? (Each answer will be collected and assessed for future studies). Will collect qualitative data for later analysis for content.
Day 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michelle Olshan-Perlmutter, PMHCNS-BC, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 14, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00098172

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Auricular Acupressure Pads

Subscribe