- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05943756
Evaluation of Well-being Interventions in Adults With TBI
January 15, 2025 updated by: Kessler Foundation
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the potential benefits of two Intervention programs in adults with TBI to improve well-being and other outcomes that are maintained over time.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The current study will examine the efficacy of Signature Strengths in adults with TBI to improve self-concept and other outcomes that are maintained over time.
Preliminary evidence suggests that after a TBI, an individual can experience significant alteration to their personal identity and a perceived loss of their pre-injury self.
By using this Signature Strength intervention, adults with moderate to severe TBI will be able to become aware of their most used "signature" strengths, explore how these strengths are used in everyday life, and apply them in future situations to bring well-being and to better cope with stressors.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
94
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Helen Genova, Ph. D.
- Phone Number: 973-324-8390
- Email: hgenova@kesslerfoundation.org
Study Locations
-
-
New Jersey
-
East Hanover, New Jersey, United States, 07936
- Recruiting
- Kessler Foundation
-
Contact:
- Helen M Genova, Ph.D.
- Email: hgenova@kesslerfoundation.org
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 18 years of age
- Have a diagnosis with moderate to severe TBI
- At least one year post injury
- Able to speak and read English fluently
Exclusion Criteria:
- Have a history of multiple sclerosis, stroke, seizures or another nervous system injuries disease in the past (like brain tumor or epilepsy)
- Have a significant psychiatric illness (like, schizophrenia or psychosis)
- Currently taking steroids and/or benzodiazepines as determined by study staff review of medications
- Significant alcohol or drug abuse history (requiring inpatient treatment)
- History of stroke, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, personality disorder or severe depression determined by extensive screening by a trained staff member
- Previous participation in a Signature Strengths program
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Signature Strengths
In this arm, participants would participate in in an intervention program meant to improve well-being in individuals who have sustained a brain injury.
|
The treatment group will complete 6 web-based sessions of Signature Strengths(1 sessions per week for 6 weeks), designed to teach lessons focused on the Aware-Explore-Apply interventional framework.
Sessions are approximately 60 minutes long.
|
|
Active Comparator: TBI Education Course
In this arm, participants would participate in in an intervention program meant to improve well-being in individuals who have sustained a brain injury.
|
The control group will complete 6 web-based sessions of a TBI Education Course(1 sessions per week for 6 weeks), designed to teach lessons based on the TBI Model Systems Knowledge Translation Center's fact sheets.
Sessions are approximately 60 minutes long.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
Self-report self-esteem questionnaire.
Values range from 10-40, with higher score indicating better outcome.
|
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
|
Strengths Knowledge and Strengths Use Scale (SKUS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
Measure to assess knowledge and use of one's strengths and measure changes following strengths-based interventions.
Two scores: Strengths Use and Strengths Knowledge.
Strengths Use values range from 14-98, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
Strengths Knowledge values range from 8-56, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
|
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
|
Head Injury Semantic Differential Scale - Version III (HISD-III)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
Self-report for examination of past and present self-identity.
Values range from 18-126, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
|
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
|
Global Assessment of Character Strengths
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
24-item questionnaire to rate levels of individual's character strengths.
Values range from 24-120, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
|
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
|
Twenty-Statements Task
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
20-item questionnaire used to measure an individual's self concept filling out the twenty items that each start with the words "I am..." which will be analyzed for positive and negative valence, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
There is no maximum or minimum value for this test.
|
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Flourishing Scale (FS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
Measure of well-being and "flourishing".
Values range from 8-56, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
|
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
|
Quality of Life After Brain Injury (QOLIBRI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
Assess Quality of Life specifically in Brain Injury.
Values range from 0-100, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
|
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
|
Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
Measure of life satisfaction.
Values range from 5-35, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
|
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
|
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
Measure of both positive and negative emotional feelings.
Values range from 10-50, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
|
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
|
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
10 item, Self-report measure of perceived stress.
Values range from 0-40, with higher score indicating a worse outcome.
|
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
|
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 (CD-RISC-10)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
10 item self-report measure of resilience.
Values range from 0-40, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
|
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
|
Brain Injury Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
20 item self-report measure of self-efficacy and coping.
Values range from 0-80, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
|
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
|
Voicemail Elicitation Task
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
Measures how individuals respond to social situations using politeness/impoliteness.
Values are calculated by dividing the total number of politeness markers by the total time in minutes, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
There are no minimum or maximum values for this test.
|
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Helen Genova, Ph. D., Kessler Foundation
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 25, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 12, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
July 13, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 15, 2025
Last Verified
January 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- E-1220-23
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
-
Sheba Medical CenterRecruitingTraumatic Brain Injury (TBI) PatientsIsrael
-
ElMindA LtdAthletico Physical TherapyCompletedMinor Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)United States
-
ElMindA LtdNoran Neurological ClinicCompletedHealthy | Minor Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)United States
-
Healing Hope InternationalNot yet recruitingTraumatic Brain Injury | Traumatic Brain Injury With Brief Loss of Consciousness | Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI); Concussion, Initial Encounter | Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI); Concussion, Subsequent Encounter | Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients | Traumatic Brain Injury With Persistent Cognitive...United States, Mexico
-
ElMindA LtdYork UniversityCompletedMinor Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)Canada
-
Indiana UniversityNot yet recruitingTraumatic Brain Injury | TBI | Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) PatientsUnited States
-
NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeNot yet recruitingTraumatic Brain Injury (TBI); Concussion, Initial Encounter
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterAlbert Einstein College of Medicine; National Institute of Neurological Disorders... and other collaboratorsRecruitingTBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) | TBI | Traumatic Brain Injury With Loss of Consciousness | Brain Injury Traumatic Severe | Brain Injury Traumatic ModerateUnited States
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en AutomatiqueRecruitingTBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)France
-
Mansoura UniversityRecruitingTBI Traumatic Brain InjuryEgypt
Clinical Trials on Signature Strengths
-
University of MichiganCompletedMental Disorders | Psychiatric Hospitalization | Child/Adolescent Problems
-
University of GuelphCompleted
-
Peking UniversityRecruitingGastric Cancer Patients Received ImmunotherapyChina
-
National Institute of CancerologíaRecruiting
-
Institut Claudius RegaudCompletedOvarian AdenocarcinomaFrance
-
Université du Québec a MontréalCompletedLow Back PainCanada
-
University Hospital, GrenobleCompleted
-
Chinese University of Hong KongCompleted
-
Institut Paoli-CalmettesUnknown
-
University of GuelphRecruiting