Evaluation of Well-being Interventions in Adults With TBI

January 15, 2025 updated by: Kessler Foundation
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the potential benefits of two Intervention programs in adults with TBI to improve well-being and other outcomes that are maintained over time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The current study will examine the efficacy of Signature Strengths in adults with TBI to improve self-concept and other outcomes that are maintained over time. Preliminary evidence suggests that after a TBI, an individual can experience significant alteration to their personal identity and a perceived loss of their pre-injury self. By using this Signature Strength intervention, adults with moderate to severe TBI will be able to become aware of their most used "signature" strengths, explore how these strengths are used in everyday life, and apply them in future situations to bring well-being and to better cope with stressors.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

94

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Have a diagnosis with moderate to severe TBI
  • At least one year post injury
  • Able to speak and read English fluently

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a history of multiple sclerosis, stroke, seizures or another nervous system injuries disease in the past (like brain tumor or epilepsy)
  • Have a significant psychiatric illness (like, schizophrenia or psychosis)
  • Currently taking steroids and/or benzodiazepines as determined by study staff review of medications
  • Significant alcohol or drug abuse history (requiring inpatient treatment)
  • History of stroke, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, personality disorder or severe depression determined by extensive screening by a trained staff member
  • Previous participation in a Signature Strengths program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Signature Strengths
In this arm, participants would participate in in an intervention program meant to improve well-being in individuals who have sustained a brain injury.
The treatment group will complete 6 web-based sessions of Signature Strengths(1 sessions per week for 6 weeks), designed to teach lessons focused on the Aware-Explore-Apply interventional framework. Sessions are approximately 60 minutes long.
Active Comparator: TBI Education Course
In this arm, participants would participate in in an intervention program meant to improve well-being in individuals who have sustained a brain injury.
The control group will complete 6 web-based sessions of a TBI Education Course(1 sessions per week for 6 weeks), designed to teach lessons based on the TBI Model Systems Knowledge Translation Center's fact sheets. Sessions are approximately 60 minutes long.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Self-report self-esteem questionnaire. Values range from 10-40, with higher score indicating better outcome.
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Strengths Knowledge and Strengths Use Scale (SKUS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Measure to assess knowledge and use of one's strengths and measure changes following strengths-based interventions. Two scores: Strengths Use and Strengths Knowledge. Strengths Use values range from 14-98, with higher score indicating a better outcome. Strengths Knowledge values range from 8-56, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Head Injury Semantic Differential Scale - Version III (HISD-III)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Self-report for examination of past and present self-identity. Values range from 18-126, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Global Assessment of Character Strengths
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
24-item questionnaire to rate levels of individual's character strengths. Values range from 24-120, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Twenty-Statements Task
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
20-item questionnaire used to measure an individual's self concept filling out the twenty items that each start with the words "I am..." which will be analyzed for positive and negative valence, with higher score indicating a better outcome. There is no maximum or minimum value for this test.
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Flourishing Scale (FS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Measure of well-being and "flourishing". Values range from 8-56, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Quality of Life After Brain Injury (QOLIBRI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Assess Quality of Life specifically in Brain Injury. Values range from 0-100, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Measure of life satisfaction. Values range from 5-35, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Measure of both positive and negative emotional feelings. Values range from 10-50, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
10 item, Self-report measure of perceived stress. Values range from 0-40, with higher score indicating a worse outcome.
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 (CD-RISC-10)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
10 item self-report measure of resilience. Values range from 0-40, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Brain Injury Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
20 item self-report measure of self-efficacy and coping. Values range from 0-80, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Voicemail Elicitation Task
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest
Measures how individuals respond to social situations using politeness/impoliteness. Values are calculated by dividing the total number of politeness markers by the total time in minutes, with a higher score indicating a better outcome. There are no minimum or maximum values for this test.
Baseline, 3 months posttest, and 6 months posttest

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Helen Genova, Ph. D., Kessler Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)

Clinical Trials on Signature Strengths

Subscribe