Expressive Interviewing Agents to Support Health-Related Behavior Change

July 9, 2023 updated by: Rada Mihalcea, University of Michigan

Expressive Interviewing Agents to Support Health-Related Behavior Change: Randomized Controlled Study of COVID-19 Behaviors

Expressive writing and motivational interviewing are well-known approaches to help patients handle stressful life events. While these methods are often applied by human counselors, it is less well understood if an automated approach can encourage behavior changes in patients. This study presents an automated writing system and evaluates its impact on individual behavior related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The investigators developed a rule-based dialogue system for "Expressive Interviewing" to elicit writing from participants on the subject of how COVID-19 has impacted their lives. In May-June 2021, the investigators randomly assigned online participants (N=151) to the Expressive Interviewing task and a control condition. The investigators examined their behavior with a survey before the intervention, immediately after, and two weeks after. In aggregate, task participants experienced a significant decrease in stress in the short-term (~23% decrease, p < 0.001) and no significant changes in longer-term outcomes compared to the control group. Within the task, participants showed different outcomes based on their writing. Participants who wrote with more anxiety-related words showed a greater short-term decrease in stress (R=-0.264, p<0.001), and those who wrote with more positive emotion words reported a more meaningful experience (R=0.243, p=0.001). For longer-term effects, participants who wrote with more lexical diversity underwent an increase in social activity (R=0.266, p<0.001). Expressive Interviewing can generally help with mental health in the short term but not longer-term, and participants' writing choices may make a difference in outcomes. While there were no significant long-term effects observed, the positive short term effect points to potential future directions with a series of Expressive Interviewing interventions for longer-term effects.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

151

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Using Prolific platform as crowd worker
  • Living in United States

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participating in another condition of the same study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Expressive Interviewing + Survey
Intervention with Expressive Interviewing computer system. Participants spent roughly 10-15 minutes each in conversation with an automated computer chat system. Participants answered a survey about mental health and social outcomes immediately before the intervention and two weeks after the intervention.
Automated computer system designed to engage participants in discussion about challenges faced during the COVID-19 pandemic.
No Intervention: Survey Only
No intervention. Participants answered a survey about mental health and social outcomes at time of recruitment and two weeks afterward.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stress (short-term)
Time Frame: 20 minutes
Short-term change in stress, self-assessed before and after intervention. Participants answered the question "How stressed are you feeling right now?" with a 1-7 point scale, where higher means more stress. Stress variable was assessed for change after the intervention.
20 minutes
Mental health (long-term)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Long-term change in stress, anxiety, and other mental health behaviors, before and after study. Participants answered 5 questions related to mental health, such as "Over the last two weeks, how often have you been bothered by the following problems? - Not being able to stop or control worrying" with a 1-7 point scale indicating number of days per week that the mental health condition affected them. Higher scores indicate negative outcome. HMental health condition was assessed for change after the intervention/control.
2 weeks
Social behavior (long-term)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Long-term change in socialization, before and after study. Participants answered 6 questions related to social behavior, such as "In the last week, on how many days did you do the following in the presence of people who were not fully vaccinated or with unknown vaccination status: - Have a face-to-face meeting with someone outside your home" with a 1-7 point scale indicating number of days per week that they participated in the social behavior. Higher scores indicate positive outcome. Social behavior was assessed for change after the intervention/control.
2 weeks
Awareness of COVID-19
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Long-term change in awareness of COVID-19 problems, before and after study. Participants answered 12 questions related to COVID awareness, such as "In the last week, on how many days did you - Talk to people about COVID-19 and/or vaccinations" with a 1-7 point scale indicating number of days per week that they exhibited such behavior. Higher scores indicate negative outcome. COVID awareness was assessed for change after the intervention/control.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 24, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 7, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 7, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00182586

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No sharing of individual participant data due to privacy concerns.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Stress

Clinical Trials on Expressive Interviewing

Subscribe