Adjuvant Effects of Monochromatic Infrared Energy in Rehabilitation of Adolescents With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

July 15, 2023 updated by: Ragab Kamal Elnaggar, Cairo University

Would Integrating Monochromatic Infrared Energy Into the Physical Rehabilitation of Adolescents With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Have Any Advantageous Effects? a Randomized Controlled Trial

This study assessed if integrating monochromatic infrared energy (MIRE) would affect pain, dynamic postural control, functional status, and health-related quality of life in adolescents with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). Forty-six patients with PFPS were randomly allocated to the MIRE group (n = 23, received the received MIRE in addition to the traditional physical therapy program) or the control group (n = 23, received the traditional physical therapy program only). Both groups were assessed for pain, dynamic postural control, functional status, and health-related quality before and after intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Forty-six adolescents with PFPS were recruited from the university's outpatient orthopedic and physical therapy clinics and two referral hospitals in AlKharj, Saudi Arabia. The study included patients who were 15-18 years old, had anterior-knee or retro-patellar pain that increase with activities like squatting, running, prolonged sitting, or stair climbing, had PFPS with insidious onset for more than 6 weeks without any traumatic incidence, and were not participating in a regular exercise program in the past 3 months. Patients who had meniscal tears, collateral/cruciate ligament injury, knee arthritis, a history of knee/hip surgery, or previous patellar subluxation/dislocation were excluded.

Outcome measures

Pain: Pain during rest and/or movement was assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale.

Dynamic postural control: The dynamic postural control was assessed through the modified star excursion balance test (mSEBT).

Functional status: The functional status was evaluated using the Arabic version of the Anterior Knee Pain Questionnaire (Kujala Questionnaire).

Quality of life: The quality of life was assessed through the self-report Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory.

Interventions

The MIRE group underwent MIRE application on the affected knee for 40 minutes, 3 times a week for 3 consecutive months. The MIRE was delivered using an Anodyne Therapy Professional Infrared Therapy System (parameter: a wavelength of 890 nm and radiant power at a rate of 6.24 W). Participants in the MIRE group further received the traditional physical therapy program (60 minutes/session) that consisted of stretching and strengthening exercises for the muscles surrounding the hip and knee, balance exercises, as well as other electrotherapeutic modalities (ultrasound and hot application). The control group received the traditional physical therapy program only.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Riyadh
      • Al Kharj, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
        • Ragab K. Elnaggar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between15 and18 years.
  • Anterior-knee or retro-patellar pain that increases with activities like squatting, running, prolonged sitting, or stair climbing.
  • PFPS with insidious onset for more than 6 weeks without any traumatic incidence.
  • Not participating in a regular exercise program within the last three months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Meniscal tears
  • Collateral/cruciate ligament injury
  • Knee arthritis
  • History of hip/knee surgery
  • Previous patellar subluxation/dislocation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MIRE group
Participants in this group underwent MIRE application in addition to the traditional physical therapy program
The monochromatic infrared energy was delivered through an Anodyne Therapy Professional Infrared Therapy System. Light energy (parameter: a wavelength of 890 nm and radiant power at a rate of 6.24 W) was produced through 8 array diode therapy pads applied on both knees (on the medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior aspects of each knee), each including 60 super-luminescent gallium-aluminum arsenide diodes. The MIRE was applied for 40 minutes/session, three times a week, for three successive months.
Active Comparator: Control
Participants in this group received the traditional physical therapy program only.
The traditional physical therapy program consisted of stretching and strengthening exercises for the muscles surrounding the hip and knee, balance exercises, as well as other electrotherapeutic modalities (ultrasound and hot application).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: 3 months
Participants reported how much they feel pain during rest and/or movement on the 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 indicates the "worst possible pain".
3 months
Dynamic postural control
Time Frame: 3 months
The dynamic postural control was assessed through the modified star excursion balance test (mSEBT). Participants stood in the middle of a floor grid with three reach lines creating a Y shape. They were told to stand on one limb and extend as far as they could with the distal end of the reaching limb pointed in each anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral direction. The distance from the center to the point of the foot reach was then measured with a measuring tape (in/cm), and the reaching limb was restored to the starting position. The composite reach distance of the three directions was calculated and normalized to the length of the leg and used for data analysis. The higher the normalized mSEBT score the better the postural control.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional status
Time Frame: 3 months
To evaluate functional status, the Arabic version of the Anterior Knee Pain Questionnaire (Kujala Questionnaire) was utilized. It measures the functional limitations imposed on by patellofemoral pain with 13 self-reported items. Six physical activities-sitting, squatting, walking, climbing stairs, leaping, and running-were chosen to assess pain, abnormal patellar movement, edema, limited knee flexion, and quadriceps atrophy. The score is 0 to 100, with 100 representing no discomfort or functional impairment and 0 representing total functional incapacity.
3 months
Life quality
Time Frame: 3 months
To evaluate the quality of life, the self-report Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) was utilized. It is a 23-item multidimensional assessment of children's and adolescents' health-related quality of life that is broken down into four domains: physical (8 items), emotional (5 items), social (5 items), and school-related (3 items). Scores range from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always) for each item. The scale for the items is linear reversed on a 0-100 scale, with 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Higher scores denotes better quality of life.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ragab K. Elnaggar, PhD, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 29, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 29, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Monochromatic infrared energy

Subscribe