Maximal Repair Versus Bridging Reconstruction with BioBrace®

February 14, 2025 updated by: Ivan Wong, MD, Nova Scotia Health Authority

Maximal Repair Versus Bridging Reconstruction with BioBrace® for the Treatment of Chronic, Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Clinical, Radiographic, and In-vivo Biomechanical Analysis

The purpose of this study is to determine if using BioBrace® to reconstruct the gap in the rotator cuff tears lead to better results for patients compared to the traditional maximal repair method. This study will use a variety of clinical, radiographic, and functional outcome measures. Specifically, the researchers will be comparing the re-tear rate, patient reported outcomes, shoulder strength, range of motion, muscle activation, in-vivo biomechanics, and other radiographic outcomes using x-ray and MRI.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H2E1
        • Recruiting
        • Nova Scotia Health Authority
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proven diagnosis of a large or massive (> 3cm), two-tendon (supraspinatus and infraspinatus) tear of the shoulder rotator cuff
  • over 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • glenohumeral osteoarthritis
  • Western Ontario rotator cuff score >60
  • uncontrolled diabetes (Hgb A1C >7%)
  • pregnant
  • local or systemic infection
  • inability to cooperate with and/or comprehend post-operative instructions
  • MRI proven non-vascular sites
  • poor nutritional state (Alb <30 g/L)
  • cancer
  • paralysis of the shoulder
  • contracture of the shoulder
  • patients unable to provide informed consent for the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Repair
This group will undergo a rotator cuff repair procedure.
Patients in the maximal repair group will undergo a SCOI-row rotator cuff repair with adequate tension as described previously, with recreation of the rotator cable. Briefly, the SCOI-row rotator cuff repair uses one triple loaded suture anchor for each 1.2cm of torn tendon. This technique has been completed in a previous randomized controlled trial.
Experimental: Bridging Reconstruction using BioBrace
This experimental group will undergo bridging reconstruction using the bioinductive implant, BioBrace.
Patients in the reconstruction group will undergo maximal repair with interposition bridging using BioBrace. This technique will follow a previously described technique by the principal investigator with differences allocated to the graft, it's preparation and insertion. The bursa will be debrided, and rotator cuff edged will be shaved down to stable tissue. BioBrace is bioinductive scaffold composed of highly porous type I collagen and bio-resorbable poly (L-lactide) (PLLA) microfilaments, and will be used as the graft in this trial.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic or clinical failure
Time Frame: 2 years
The primary outcome measure for this study will be radiographic and/or clinical failure defined as a rotator cuff tear of equal or larger size than at baseline or does not meet WORC score MCID compared to baseline at any follow up
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acromiohumeral Distance
Time Frame: 2 year
Acromiohumeral distance (AHD) will be measured on pre- and post-operative x-rays.
2 year
Muscle Atrophy
Time Frame: 2 year
Using MRI, muscle atrophy will be measured using Warner's classification between groups.
2 year
Fatty Infiltration
Time Frame: 2 year
Fatty infiltration using the Goutallier classification will be used and identified
2 year
Healing Rate
Time Frame: 2 year
To measure the structural integrity of the surgery, Sugaya method will be used.
2 year
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 1-year, 2-years
WORC will be measured pre-operatively, and post-operatively and 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years
Baseline, 6-month, 1-year, 2-years
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 1-year, 2-years
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon survey will be measured pre-operatively, and post-operatively and 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years
Baseline, 6-month, 1-year, 2-years
EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 1-year, 2-years
EQ-5D-5L for overall health will be measured pre-operatively, and post-operatively at 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years
Baseline, 6-month, 1-year, 2-years
Range of motion
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 1-year, 2-years
The range of motion, measured in degrees for flexion, extension, abduction, internal, and external rotation will be measured. These are measured and compared pre-operatively, and post-operatively and 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years
Baseline, 6-month, 1-year, 2-years
Shoulder strength
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 1-year, 2-years
The strength of patients flexion, extension, abduction, internal, and external rotation will be measured. These are measured and compared pre-operatively, and post-operatively and 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years
Baseline, 6-month, 1-year, 2-years
Biomechanics and Muscle Activity
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 years
Pre- and post-operative (1-year) in-vivo biomechanics and electromyography will be compared between groups during a standardized shoulder lifting study in a laboratory based environment.
Baseline and 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ivan Wong, MD, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Orthopaedic Surgeon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 7, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tears

Clinical Trials on Repair

Subscribe