SVF Combined With Functional Self-assembling Peptide Nanofiber Hydrogels in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury

July 27, 2023 updated by: Hui Zhu, Kunming Tongren Hospital

Safety and Feasibility of Stromal Vascular Fraction (SVF) Combined With Functional Self-assembling Peptide Nanofiber Hydrogels in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a severe medical problem experienced by people worldwide with high mortality and long term morbidity. Although progress has been made in understanding cellular and molecular mechanisms of SCI, treatment and management protocols aimed at ameliorating neurologic damage in patients remain ineffective. Cells and biomaterials offer new hope for the treatment of SCI.

Up to now, there have been many studies on the treatment of SCI using cells and biomaterials. Stromal Vascular Fraction (SVF) is a heterogeneous mixture of cells obtained from adipose tissue. These cells include adipose-derived stem cells, endothelial cells, endothelial progenitor cells, pericytes, T cells, and other immune cells. SVF has strong self-renewal, proliferation and differentiation potential, it can replace necrotic cells and synthesize a variety of bioactive factors through paracrine and autocrine, activate cell and vascular regeneration pathways. Therefore, SVF shows significant advantages. The sequence of functional self-assembling peptide nanofiber hydrogels (hereinafter referred to as hydrogels) is HGF(RADA)4RIKVAV (H: histidine; G: Glycine; F: phenylalanine; R: arginine; A: Alanine; D: aspartic acid; I: isoleucine; K: Lysine; V: valerine). The hydrogel is based on the short peptide RADA16 ((RADA)4, which is already available in the product PuramatrixTM for clinical hemostasis and cell culture, but the aqueous solution of PuramatrixTM is acidic which harms cells and tissues upon direct contact. While the hydrogels in this study is pH neutral and does not harm cells and tissues. Articles published by the provider demonstrate that hydrogels can support 3D stem cell growth, have good biocompatibility in vivo (animal spinal cord), and promote neural regeneration after SCI. The chemical structure of the hydrogels is simple and clear, and the degradation product is amino acid. Therefore, SVF and the hydrogel from functional self-assembling peptide are combined for SCI repair in the study.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Yunnan
      • Kunming, Yunnan, China, 650000
        • Recruiting
        • Kunming Tongren Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female adults, 18-60 years of age, with a clinical diagnosis of chronic traumatic SCI (≥ 3 months after SCI)
  2. Neurological examination: ASIA-A
  3. Both the spinal and neurological levels of injury were between T1-T12
  4. Subjects must be able to read, write and complete visual analogue scale
  5. Voluntarily signs and dates an informed Consent form, approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), prior to any study-specific procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with osteoporosis or had joint disease
  2. Severe head injury
  3. Severe pressure sore
  4. Sign of kidney, cardiovascular, liver disorders
  5. Subjects with internal medical and/or infectious diseases (including but not limited to Hepatitis B and HIV carriers)
  6. Pregnant women or women at lactation stages
  7. Medically or mentally unstable according to the judgment of the investigator
  8. History of multiple sclerosis or peripheral demyelination
  9. Any criteria which, in the opinion of the investigator, suggests that the subject would not be compliant with the study protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Kunming Locomotor Scale (KLS) at 12 months
Time Frame: Day 0, Month 12
Scale from minimum (1) to maximum (10), higher scales mean a better outcome.
Day 0, Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury at 12 months
Time Frame: Day 0, Month 12
Score from minimum (0) to maximum (20), higher scores mean a better outcome.
Day 0, Month 12
Change from Baseline American Spinal Injury Association International Standards for Neurologic Classification of Spinal Cord Injury at 12 months
Time Frame: Day 0, Month 12

Motor scores: bilateral upper and lower extremities total: minimum (0) to maximum (100), higher scores mean a better outcome.

Sensory scores: bilateral light touch total from minimum (0) and maximum (112), bilateral pin prick from minimum (0) and maximum (112), higher scores mean a better outcome.

Day 0, Month 12
Change from Baseline Spinal Cord Independence Measure at 12 months
Time Frame: Day 0, Month 12
Score from minimum (0) to maximum (100), higher scores mean a better outcome.
Day 0, Month 12
Change from Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) at 12 months
Time Frame: Day 0, Month 12
Scale from minimum (0) to maximum (4), higher scales mean a worse outcome.
Day 0, Month 12
Change from Baseline International Index of Erectile Function at 12 months
Time Frame: Day 0, Month 12
Male subjects only. Score from minimum (0) to maximum (25), higher scores mean a better outcome.
Day 0, Month 12
Change from Baseline Numerical rating scale at 12 months
Time Frame: Day 0, Month 12
Scale from minimum (0) to maximum (10), higher scales mean a worse outcome.
Day 0, Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Safety Issues

Subscribe