Inhalational Anesthesia vs TIVA in Endoscopic Tympanoplasty (TIVA)

October 30, 2023 updated by: Leslie Son, Our Lady of the Lake Hospital

Comparison of Inhalational Anesthesia and Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Surgical Field Quality and Post-operative Recovery in Endoscopic Tympanoplasty

This study aims to prospectively compare surgical field quality and intraoperative blood loss between general inhalational anesthesia to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) alone in subjects undergoing endoscopic ear surgery. A secondary objective is to compare rates of emergence delirium and total recovery time between the two groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In sinus surgery, TIVA has been described as a possible advantage in the use of endoscopic ear surgery. However, to date, there are no studies that examine blood loss, surgical field quality, and recovery in TIVA compared to inhalational anesthesia in the setting of endoscopic ear surgery. The hypothesis is that in patients who undergo endoscopic tympanoplasty, those who receive TIVA will have reduced intraoperative blood loss, improved surgical field quality, and reduced emergence agitation than those who receive inhalational anesthesia. This study will be a prospective double-blinded randomized control trial consisting of subjects undergoing endoscopic tympanoplasty surgery to assess intraoperative blood loss, surgical field quality, rates of emergence delirium, and recovery time.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Leslie S Son, PhD
  • Phone Number: 225-765-7659
  • Email: Lson@lsuhsc.edu

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Louisiana
      • Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States, 70808
        • Recruiting
        • Our Lady of the Lake Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals of all ages
  • Scheduled to undergo an endoscopic tympanoplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with anticoagulation disorders
  • Those receiving anticoagulation therapy currently

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Inhalational Anesthesia

Adults:

The control group will receive general inhalational anesthesia (sevoflurane, isoflurane). The will be induced with fentanyl 1-2µg/kg, propofol 2mg/kg, lidocaine 1mg/kg. After orotracheal intubation, anesthesia will be maintained with isoflurane 1.5-2% or sevoflurane 1-2%.

Children (12 or younger) induced with a combination of volatile anesthetic gases, including sevoflurane (up to 8%) and nitrous oxide gas (up to 70%). Those who are older than 12 will have an intravenous line placed in the preoperative area and as such will be induced with remifentanil and propofol as above. For maintenance, children in the control arm will receive 0.6 - 1.5% sevoflurane.

1.5-2%
1-2% adults 0.6-1.5% Children
Active Comparator: Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA)

Adults:

The comparator arm will receive total intravenous anesthesia (propofol and remifentanil). They will be induced with fentanyl 1-2µg/kg, propofol 2mg/kg, and lidocaine 1mg/kg. After orotracheal intubation, anesthesia will be maintained with propofol 100-200mcg/kg/min, remifentanil 0.05-2µg/kg/min.

Children (12 or younger) induced with a combination of volatile anesthetic gases, including sevoflurane (up to 8%) and nitrous oxide gas (up to 70%). Those who are older than 12 will have an intravenous line placed in the preoperative area and as such will be induced with remifentanil and propofol as above. For maintenance, they will receive 100-200mcg/min propofol and 0.05-2µg/kg/min remifentanil.

1mg/kg-mcg/kg/min adults 100-200mcg/kg/min children
0.05-2ug/kg/min adults and children

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical Field Quality
Time Frame: Post-Operative evaluation (within 2 weeks)
Neurotologists will evaluate endoscopic video clips from each surgery to assess clarity of field at different points in the surgery using the Boezaart scale grading system. It is a scale from 0-5, with 0 being the most favorable outcome and 5 being the least favorable outcome.
Post-Operative evaluation (within 2 weeks)
Intra-operative blood loss
Time Frame: 1-2 hours during surgery
Intraoperative blood loss will be determined by measuring the total number of pledgets needed to attain hemostatsis. This will be a general observation with the more pledgets needed to stop bleeding in the surgical area indicates more possible blood loss than the procedures with that require less pledgets.
1-2 hours during surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emergent Delirium and Recovery Time-Riker Scale
Time Frame: Immediately After extubation
Sedation and agitation will be assessed immediately after extubation using the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) which is on scale of 1-7 with 1 being the most favorable (easier to rouse/calm but responsive) and 7 being the least favorable (deeply sedated/higher agitation).
Immediately After extubation
Emergent Delirium and Recovery Time-Richmond Scale
Time Frame: Immediately After extubation
Sedation and agitation will be assessed immediately after extubation using a second scale known as the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). The RASS is on a scale of -5 to +4, with higher/more positive scores indicating worse outcomes (aka more aggressive behavior) and lower scores indicating better outcomes (less responsiveness). A score of 0(Zero) indicates a calm but alert patient.
Immediately After extubation
Post-operative pain or complications
Time Frame: 0-1 hour post-operative
Patients will recover for 1 hour in the post-anesthesia care unit, and a well-trained nurse blinded to the randomized study group will evaluate pain intensity by using the numeric rating scale (0-10 range, with higher scores indicating worse pain) at three intervals: immediately after arrival, 30 minutes after arrival, and 60 minutes after arrival. Any rescue analgesics that are administered will be documented. Patients will be observed postoperatively for any adverse events, as is standard procedure. Any other adverse features such as nausea, vomiting, or changes in vision or color will be followed for 30 days post procedure.
0-1 hour post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rahul Mehta, MD, Our Lady of the Lake Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Perforated Eardrum

Clinical Trials on Isoflurane Inhalant Product

Subscribe