Predictive Value of the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) in Patients With Critical Limb-threatening Ischemia

August 13, 2023 updated by: RenJi Hospital

Assessing the Predictive Value of the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) in EndoVascular Therapy (EVT) of Infrainguinal Lesions in Patients With Critical Limb-threatening Ischemia (CLTI): the GLASS-EVT Study

The Global Vascular Guideline on chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) proposes the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS), a new angiographic scoring system to quantify the anatomic severity of infrainguinal disease in CLTI patients. However, GLASS validation still needs to be completed, and the infrapopliteal (IP) target artery pathway (TAP) was easily influenced by the procedures. Thus the IP target artery could be selected either as the least diseased artery based on angiography or prospectively based on the angiosome concept. So the investigators aim to evaluate its correlation with clinical outcomes after revascularization.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The Global Vascular Guideline on chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) recommends using the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) to assess the severity of infrainguinal disease in CLTI patients. GLASS staging involves scoring the femoropopliteal (FP) and infrapopliteal (IP) segments separately. For IP segment scoring, the target artery path (TAP) is identified by the clinician based on either the least diseased or the recanalized IP path. However, this approach may lead to diverse GLASS staging results, especially for simple lesions below the knee. Additionally, the current version of GLASS does not account for multivessel IP revascularization, which may introduce subjective bias if a physician chooses different IP targets during multiple revascularization procedures.

In order to improve our understanding of the current staging system, the investigators will establish a prospective registry that collects data on conservative patients who have Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia (CLTI) and undergo endovascular therapy for infrainguinal lesions. To evaluate the stage of the lesions, the investigators will use two distinct IP scoring techniques. One approach will be based on the least disease IP path as identified by the pre-interventional angiogram, while the second technique will be based on the recanalized IP path preferred by the clinician. This scoring will be carried out by experienced physicians and the results will be recorded in an electronic database. Then the correlation between the major adverse limb events (such as clinical-driven target limb revascularization, major amputation, and all-cause death) with the patient's Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection (WIFI) classification, GLASS anatomic staging, calcification severity, and modified Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) run-off score will be analyzed.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with infrainguinal lesions suffering from critical limb-threatening ischemia

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical diagnosis of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI)
  2. Undergo endovascular therapy for infrainguinal lesions

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant women or female patients with potential childbearing
  2. Patients who have acute limb thromboembolism or require thrombectomy during the procedure
  3. Untreated inflow disease of the ipsilateral pelvic arteries (more than 50% stenosis or occlusion)
  4. Patients with known allergy to contrast media

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of freedom from major adverse events (MAEs)
Time Frame: 12-month
Major adverse events (MAEs) is defined as index limb amputation above the ankle, clinical-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), or all-cause death
12-month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of acute procedure success
Time Frame: 72-hour after procedure
Acute procedure success is defined as technique success ( the achievement of final residual diameter stenosis <30% for stent and <50% for angioplasty or atherectomy by angiography at the end of the procedure and without flow-limiting arterial dissection or hemodynamically significant trans-lesional pressure gradient <10 mm Hg for endovascular revascularization ) and freedom form MAEs within 72 hours of the index procedure.
72-hour after procedure
Rate of freedom from clinical-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR)
Time Frame: 24-month
Patients without clinical-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR)
24-month
Rate of freedom from major adverse events (MAEs)
Time Frame: 24-month
Major adverse events (MAEs) is defined as index limb amputation above the ankle, clinical-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), or all-cause death
24-month
Primary sustained clinical improvement assessed by Rutherford classification
Time Frame: 24-month
Primary sustained clinical improvement is defined as an upward shift on the Rutherford classification to a level of claudication without the need for repeated target lesion revascularization in surviving patients without the need for unplanned amputation.
24-month
Change of quality of life assessed by Vasc quality of life scale
Time Frame: 24-month
Postoperative Vasc quality of life score minus preoperative Vasc quality of life score
24-month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Arterial Disease

Clinical Trials on GLASS staging

3
Subscribe