Comparing Postoperative Pain After Pericapsular Nerve Block and Fascia Iliaca Block in Total Hip Arthroplasty

August 21, 2023 updated by: Diaaeldin Badr Aboelnile, Ain Shams University

A Comparative Study Between the Postoperative Analgesic Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) and Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) in Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of this study is to investigate the efficiency of post-operative analgesia by fascia iliaca compartment block versus pericapsular nerve group block block in reducing narcotic consumption during the first 24 hour post-operatively by using the Visual Analogue Scale.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Total hip arthroplasty is a widely used surgical treatment intervention for treating hip conditions such as femur neck fractures and advanced hip osteoarthritis.

Hip fractures are quite common, regardless of the age of the population (young or old), and they are extremely painful. A hip fracture is a serious injury with potentially life-threatening complications, and it is a common orthopedic emergency in elderly individuals. Early surgery within 48 hours of a fracture has been found to lower mortality and complication rates.

The pericapsular nerve group block is a novel regional analgesia technique to decrease pain after THA while preserving the motor function. The local anaesthetic is deposited using this method in the fascial plane between the psoas muscle and the superior pubic ramus, which aims sensory branches of the obturator, accessory obturator, and femoral nerves in the anterior capsule of the hip.

Fascia iliaca compartment block, for procedures on the femur and hip joint, is still a well-liked regional anaesthetic technique. Studies have found that FICB prevents complications by anaesthetizing the femoral nerve far from critical neurovascular structures while still giving enough analgesia.

Both blocks could be used to effectively reduce pain intensity up to 24 hours, total opioid consumption, and length of hospital stay in THA patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Diaaeldin DA Aboelnile, MD, Lecturer
  • Phone Number: 00201018380033
  • Email: diaabadr@gmail.com

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11588
        • Recruiting
        • Ain Shams University Hospitals
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-80 years.
  2. Sex: Both sexes.
  3. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class I, II, and III.
  4. Scheduled for Total hip arthroplasty (THA) under spinal anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Declining to give a written informed consent.
  2. History of allergy to the medications used in the study.
  3. Contraindications to regional anesthesia (including patient refusal, coagulopathy, and local infection).
  4. Psychiatric disorders.
  5. Significant cognitive dysfunction.
  6. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class IV.
  7. Liver failure, renal insufficiency (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2).
  8. Patients who had failed spinal anaesthesia were excluded from the study.
  9. Pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: The fascia iliaca compartment block group
The first group 34 patients

Block will be performed using an ultrasound machine with a high-frequency linear probe covered with a sterile sheath and 100 mm needle.

The patient will be positioned supine to perform the block, the skin is disinfected and the transducer positioned to identify the femoral artery and the iliopsoas muscle and fascia iliaca. The transducer is moved laterally until the sartorius muscle is identified. The in-plane technique will be used, and the tip of the needle will be inserted between the fascia iliaca and iliopsoas muscle. a syringe containing 15ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected.

Other Names:
  • FICB
The block will be performed using the curvilinear low-frequency ultrasound probe to be placed over the line parallel to the inguinal ligament then It will be rotated 45◦ to identify the anterior inferior iliac spine, the iliopubic eminence, and the psoas tendon. A 22-gauge, 80 mm echogenic needle will be inserted in an in-plane approach to place the tip in the musculofascial plane between the pubic ramus posteriorly and the psoas tendon anteriorly a syringe containing 15ml of normal saline will be injected .
Other Names:
  • palcebo PENG
Active Comparator: The pericapsular nerve block group
The second group 34 patients
The block will be performed using the curvilinear low-frequency ultrasound probe to be placed over the line parallel to the inguinal ligament then It will be rotated 45◦ to identify the anterior inferior iliac spine, the iliopubic eminence, and the psoas tendon. A 22-gauge, 80 mm echogenic needle will be inserted in an in-plane approach to place the tip in the musculofascial plane between the pubic ramus posteriorly and the psoas tendon anteriorly a syringe containing 15ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected .
Other Names:
  • PENG

Block will be performed using an ultrasound machine with a high-frequency linear probe covered with a sterile sheath and 100 mm needle.

The patient will be positioned supine to perform the block, the skin is disinfected and the transducer positioned to identify the femoral artery and the iliopsoas muscle and fascia iliaca. The transducer is moved laterally until the sartorius muscle is identified. The in-plane technique will be used, and the tip of the needle will be inserted between the fascia iliaca and iliopsoas muscle. a syringe containing 15ml of normal saline will be injected.

Other Names:
  • palcebo FICB

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The effect of the studied blocks on the Visual Analogue Scale for pain
Time Frame: Immediately postoperatively (zero time)
the Visual Analogue Scale for pain is ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is maximum pain
Immediately postoperatively (zero time)
Change in the Visual Analogue Scale for pain
Time Frame: Every 2 hours during the first 6 hours
the Visual Analogue Scale for pain is ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is maximum pain
Every 2 hours during the first 6 hours
Change in the Visual Analogue Scale for pain
Time Frame: every 6 hours in the first 24 hours postoperatively
the Visual Analogue Scale for pain is ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is maximum pain
every 6 hours in the first 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The total dose of nalbuphine in mg was used postoperatively per patient
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
rescue analgesia
24 hours postoperatively
Mean arterial blood pressure change
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
hemodynamics
24 hours postoperatively
Heart rate change
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
hemodynamics
24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Diaaeldin DA Aboelnile, MD, Lecturer, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 21, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FMASU MD76/2023

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on fascia iliaca compartment block

Subscribe