Intraoral Scanners as Periodontal and Dental Pathologies Diagnosis Tools (Odonto3D)

April 24, 2024 updated by: CHU de Reims

Digital Extraction and Scientific Visualization of Clinical Characteristics From 3D Data From Intraoral Scanners for Dental and Periodontal Pathologies Research : Computer Formalization and Feasibility Study

Periodontal diseases and dental pathologies are highly prevalent oral diseases. Thirty-three to fifty percent of adult population presented at least one untreated caries and more than 50% of French population are affected by severe periodontitis. These diseases affect dental organ or periodontal attached system but could have negative impact on general health, quality of life, word and individual well-being. Association between chronic diseases as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, cardiovascular diseases, and oral health have been well investigated. Dental and periodontal diagnosis is dependent of various clinical parameters time consuming and dependent operator. It represents a public health challenge. Informatic analysis detecting diseases could be a time gain and a more precise diagnosis tool. Today, any software or algorithm allow automatized detection, clinical qualitative or quantitative indices recording while these informations are present in numeric models

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The present study explores the effectiveness of intraoral scanners in the field of dental caries and periodontal diseases diagnosis Patients presenting at least on recession are recruited without randomization. A clinical examination is performed, and a 3D impression of their mouth is obtained by intraoral scanners.

The investigators hypothesized that the 3D intra oral representations could improve oral diagnosis in patients compared to clinical examination in term of time consummation and precision. In a first time, this could be achieved by the comparison of the recession measurement obtained by a clinical measure (Ramfjord, 1959) or obtained by artificial intelligence.

The secondary objectives are :

  • To compare clinical and numerical dento-prosthetic diagram
  • To compare clinical and numerical plaque control record index (O'Leary et al., 1973)
  • To compare clinical and numerical Decayed, Missed and Filled Teeth index (Klein and Palmer, 1940)
  • To compare clinical and numerical detection of mucosal lesions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Reims, France
        • Recruiting
        • Damien JOLLY
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adultes
  • consulting the Dental Care Service of the university hospital of Reims
  • presenting at least one gingival recession
  • presenting at least 10 pairs of opposing teeth
  • speaking French
  • who signed the informed consent form
  • affiliated to the French Social Security system

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients presenting :

  • pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • orthodontic treatments
  • patients under legal protection, trusteeship or guardianship
  • unable to understand auto-questionnary

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients
Intervention consists in an 3D intra oral representation of the oral cavity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recession measurement concordance (Ramfjord, 1959)
Time Frame: Day 1

Recession depths is measured between the cementum-enamel junction and the edge of the marginal gingiva.

The clinical and numerical scored will be compared.

Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dento-prosthetic diagram concordance
Time Frame: Day 1
Recording the presence or absence of tooth The clinical and numerical scored will be compared.
Day 1
Plaque Control Record Concordance (O'Leary et al., 1972)
Time Frame: Day 1

Plaque control record will be recorded on individual tooth surfaces (mesial, distal, facial, lingual).

PCR is calculated according the following formula :

PCR = (Number of faces with plaque / Total number of faces) x 100

The clinical and numerical scored will be compared.

Day 1
Gingival Index Concordance (Loe and Silness, 1963)
Time Frame: Day 1

Gingival index is scored as described :

0 Normal gingival Natural coral pink gingival with no inflammation

  1. Mild inflammation Slight changes in color, slight edema. No bleeding on probing
  2. Moderate inflammation Redness, edema and glazing Bleeding under probing
  3. Severe inflammation Marked redness and edema/ulceration Tendency to bleed spontaneously

The clinical and numerical scored will be compared.

Day 1
Decayed, Missed and Filled Teeth Index (Klein and Palmer, 1940)
Time Frame: Day 1

DMFT is the sum of decayed, missed due to caries and filled teech in the permanent teeth.

Third molars are excepted.

The clinical and numerical scored will be compared.

Day 1
Mucosal lesions detection
Time Frame: Day 1

Presence or absence of mucosal lesions.

The clinical and numerical lesions will be compared.

Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 11, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 11, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 11, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periodontitis

Clinical Trials on Numerical dental impression by intraoral scanner

Subscribe