Post Market Clinical FoIIow up (PMCF) Medical Device (MD) of Z-Systems Monotype Zirconia Dental Product: Z5m Dental Implants Registry

August 20, 2025 updated by: Z-Systems

Commercially pure (CP) titanium is the gold standard to produce dental implants because it has a huge volume of scientific publications over a period of more than 50 years, it is cheap and simple to produce (i.e., making dental implants economically "affordable") and comes in numerous specitic designs of screws tor various indications. That is why more than 95% of the implant market 5 dominated by titanlum.

However, there is an innovation trend to manufacture implants from more inert and biocompatible materials. Ceramic implants represent a valuable alternative for expanding the patient base of clinicians, especially in cases with challenging aesthetic demand. Furthermore, there has been a significant increase in the number of patients requesting metal-free dentistry or bio-holistic implant treatments.

In the past, ceramics were often branded as "inferior" quality due to its reputation as being brittle but the growing volume of scientific publications specifically an zirconia are demonstrating that lt is comparable in fracture-strength with titanium implants. There is a clear market niche for zirconia implants, especially in cases of:

  • Aesthetic reconstructions in the anterior region, especially in patients with a thin gingival biotype
  • Gingival recessions where a white colored implant is a great advantage
  • For patients with a titanium intolerance/sensitivity
  • For patients who prefer a bio-holistic/metal-free dental approach.

Today, clinicians are asking tor long-term clinical results of zirconia as a dental implant material. Therefore, Z-Systems AG is conducting this zirconia dental implant registry. A registry design was chosen because it will capture long-term benefits/risks from clinical routine without patient selection.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Olten, Switzerland, 4600
        • Recruiting
        • Praxis am Klosterplatz
        • Contact:
          • Luca Egloff, Dr. med. dent.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The patient population is anyone needing to have their missing teeth replaced.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient (≥ 18 years) was or will be implanted with up to 5 implants of the Z-Systems Z5m product group
  • Patient has signed Informed Consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Inability to give consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Z5m Dental Implants
This is an observational study, collecting data on the use of Z5m Dental Implants.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absence of persistent subjective complaints
Time Frame: 12 months post-loading final prostheis
Absence of persistent subjective complaints such as pain, foreign body sensation and/or dysesthesia
12 months post-loading final prostheis
Absence of peri-implant infection
Time Frame: 12 months post-loading final prostheis
Absence of peri-implant infection with suppuration
12 months post-loading final prostheis
Absence of mobility
Time Frame: 12 months post-loading final prostheis
Absence of mobility of dental implant
12 months post-loading final prostheis

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of occurrence of device related Adverse Device Events (ADEs) and Serious Adverse Device Events (SADEs)
Time Frame: At implant surgery, up to 3 months, 6 months, 1-5 years post-loading with the final prosthesis (i.e., at every follow-up visit after prosthetic restoration)
Secondary Safety Outcome is frequency of occurrence of device related Adverse Device Events (ADEs), Serious Device Events (SADEs). Measured by asking patient if any adverse events occured since last follow-up.
At implant surgery, up to 3 months, 6 months, 1-5 years post-loading with the final prosthesis (i.e., at every follow-up visit after prosthetic restoration)
Exploratory outcomes - complaints and incidence
Time Frame: At implant surgery, up to 3 months, 6 months, 1-5 years post-loading with the final prosthesis (i.e., at every follow-up visit after prosthetic restoration)
Rate of complaints and incidents related to the medical device during the whole registry.
At implant surgery, up to 3 months, 6 months, 1-5 years post-loading with the final prosthesis (i.e., at every follow-up visit after prosthetic restoration)
Exploratory outcomes - clinical satisfaction
Time Frame: At implant surgery, up to 3 months, 6 months, 1-5 years post-loading with the final prosthesis (i.e., at every follow-up visit after prosthetic restoration)
Clinical satisfaction measured on a Likert scale: 1 to 6, with 1 being "not satisfied at all" to 6 being "highly satisfied.
At implant surgery, up to 3 months, 6 months, 1-5 years post-loading with the final prosthesis (i.e., at every follow-up visit after prosthetic restoration)
Exploratory outcomes - patient satisfaction
Time Frame: At implant surgery, up to 3 months, 6 months, 1-5 years post-loading with the final prosthesis (i.e., at every follow-up visit after prosthetic restoration)
The patient's assessment of function and aesthetics is recorded by his/her assessment of function, aesthetic appearance, implants, speech and self-confidence. The parameters are assessed by rating the degree of satisfaction on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
At implant surgery, up to 3 months, 6 months, 1-5 years post-loading with the final prosthesis (i.e., at every follow-up visit after prosthetic restoration)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mariane Sordi, PhD, Z-Systems

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 7, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Missing Teeth

Clinical Trials on Z5m Dental Implants

Subscribe