Pain in Parkinson's Disease: Exploration of the Serotonin System in Positron Emission Tomography (PET [18F]-MPPF) (PD-Pain)

May 6, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

Pathophysiology of Pain in Parkinson's Disease: Exploration of the Serotonin System in Positron Emission Tomography (PET [18F]-MPPF)

This project will explore the involvement of the serotonin system in the pathophysiology of PD-related central pain. Thus, the serotonin system will be evaluated in PD patients with and without central pain who will benefit from brain positron emission tomography (PET) allowing in vivo imaging of 5HT1A receptors and multimodal brain MRI including morphometric imaging and functional connectivity (resting state acquisition).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The prevalence of chronic pain in PD can be estimated at 60-80% from several epidemiological studies. Both semiological and pathophysiological classification proposes specific and non-specific pain in PD. While non-specific pain is not directly related to PD but may be aggravated by the disease, specific pain is a direct result of the disease with dystonic pain characterized by painful cramps in relation to motor symptoms and non-systematic central pain such as burning, paresthesia, compression (central parkinsonian pain). A case-control study reported that cramp-like pain and central pain were three times more frequent in parkinsonian patients than in the general population. Pathophysiologically, several studies suggest an abnormal nociceptive integration process in PD patients. Previous studies have indicated that the nociceptive signal is amplified along the pain transmission pathways. This could be related to increased facilitation through central sensitization of pain pathways or decreased inhibition (reduced activity of descending inhibitory control systems). Several recent studies suggest that the noradrenergic and/or serotonergic systems may be involved in the pathophysiology of PD-related pain. Therefore, this project will explore the involvement of the serotonergic system in the pathophysiology of pain using brain neuroimaging in PD patients with central pain.

The present study hypothesize that the binding of the radiotracer [18F]-MPPF, allowing in vivo imaging of 5HT1A receptors, will be reduced in PD patients with central pain compared to non-painful PD patients at the level of the median raphe, but also at the level of several brain structures involved in the pain matrix such as the insula, the anterior and posterior cingulate cortex, the orbitofrontal cortex, etc. A correlation between the clinical parameters of pain and the brain structures in which MRP binding is decreased should make it possible to confirm the link between these serotonin binding anomalies and pain. Finally, the morphological and functional MRI study should make it possible to identify structural and functional abnormalities within the pain networks in painful Parkinson's patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Haute-Garonne
      • Toulouse, Haute-Garonne, France, 31000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with PD defined according to United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Brain Bank (UKPDSBB) criteria
  • Patients with stable anti-parkinsonian treatment for at least 4 weeks prior to inclusion
  • Patients with a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score > 25
  • Patients with a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-D score ≥ 11
  • Person affiliated or benefiting from a social security scheme.
  • Free, informed and written consent signed by the participant and the investigator (at the latest on the day of inclusion and before any examination required by the research).

    • For patients with pain

  • Patients with PD-related central pain defined according to the criteria of Marques et al, 2019
  • Patients with chronic central pain (i.e. present for at least 3 months)
  • Patients who have average pain over the previous month according to a VAS ≥ 4.

    • For patients without pain

  • Patients who do not have pain defined as VAS ≤ 4, meaning that it does not interfere with daily activity.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients treated with second line therapy
  • Patients with a history of significant psychiatric pathology according to the investigator
  • Patients treated with drugs interacting with 5HT1A receptors in the previous 4 weeks
  • Patients with contraindication to MRI
  • Patients refusing to be informed of an abnormality discovered during brain imaging
  • Patients with dyskinesias judged by the investigator to be disabling for imaging.
  • Patients under guardianship or other legal protection, deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Pregnant woman, breastfeeding woman

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: PD patients with central chronic pain
Patients from both groups will receive the same interventions, the difference between groups is the eligibility criteria. In this arm only patients presenting central chronic pain will be included
The clinical assessment consists on behavioural and motor evaluations to determine the characteristics of the population
The pain characteristics assessment will be made with a variety of scales and questionnaires which allow to identify the extent of central pain and functional impairment
The MRI examination allows anatomical imaging, diffusion imaging and functional imaging to measure specific markers
The thermotest is performed to assess the pain perception threshold
The UPDRS-III scale allows to asses motor functionality of PD patients
The PET scan after injection of [18F]-MPPF at a dose of 200 Megabecquerel/kg +/-10% allows in vivo imaging of 5HT1A receptors
Other: PD patients without pain
Patients from both groups will receive the same interventions, the difference between groups is the eligibility criteria. In this arm only patients without central chronic pain will be included
The clinical assessment consists on behavioural and motor evaluations to determine the characteristics of the population
The pain characteristics assessment will be made with a variety of scales and questionnaires which allow to identify the extent of central pain and functional impairment
The MRI examination allows anatomical imaging, diffusion imaging and functional imaging to measure specific markers
The thermotest is performed to assess the pain perception threshold
The UPDRS-III scale allows to asses motor functionality of PD patients
The PET scan after injection of [18F]-MPPF at a dose of 200 Megabecquerel/kg +/-10% allows in vivo imaging of 5HT1A receptors

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distribution volume ratio of [18F]-MPPF
Time Frame: during the procedure
The MRP [18F]-MPPF marking the 5 HT1A receptors allows the in vivo visualization of serotonergic neurons and it's sensitive to extracellular variations of serotonin
during the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity and [18F]-MPPF uptake
Time Frame: during the procedure
Correlation between [18F]-MPPF uptake and central pain intensity measured with the Visual Analog Score for pain (Scale from 0 to 10, 10 being the most fote intensity of pain)
during the procedure
Functional impairment and [18F]-MPPF uptake
Time Frame: during the procedure

Correlation between [18F]-MPPF uptake and functional impairment, measured with the Primary Parkinsonian Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire .

It is a 39-item self-questionnaire evaluating the motor and psychological quality of life of Parkinson's patients over the past month. Each question is rated from 0 (no disturbance) to 4 (maximum disturbance), and items are divided into 8 dimensions (mobility, activities of daily life, emotional well-being, psychological discomfort, social support, cognitive disorders, communication, physical discomfort).

A score is calculte in percentage. The higher the score, the lower the quality of life in this dimension. It is a simple and fast scale of transfer, reliable and validated, sensitive to change.

during the procedure
Pain perception thresholds and [18F]-MPPF uptake
Time Frame: during the procedure
Correlation between [18F]-MPPF uptake and pain perception thresholds, measured with the thermotest
during the procedure
Macrostructural markers
Time Frame: during the procedure
Measurement of macrostructural markers obtained by MRI Macrostructural markers measured by T1 and T2 sequences: density of gray matter
during the procedure
Central pain characteristics measured by Visual Analog Score for pain (VAS) and brain macrostructural markers
Time Frame: during the procedure
Correlation between brain macrostructural markers and central pain characteristics measured with the Visual Analog Score for pain (VAS) which consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be')
during the procedure
5HT1A-receptors specific radioligand binding and functional networks connectivity
Time Frame: during the procedure
Correlation between 5HT1A receptors specific radioligand binding and functional networks connectivity, obtained by IRM
during the procedure
Behavioral population characteristics obtained with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD)
Time Frame: during the procedure
Mean of patient's behavioral characteristics score obtained with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD) which is scored between 0 meaning no impairment and 3 being severe impairment
during the procedure
Motor population characteristics obtained with the Movement Disorders Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)
Time Frame: during the procedure
Mean of patient's motor characteristics score obtained with the Movement Disorders Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), which score ranges from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and 260 indicating total disability
during the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christine BREFEL-COURBON, MD PhD, University Hospital, Toulouse

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Clinical assessment

Subscribe