RAE Versus MIE in Patients With Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy

August 21, 2023 updated by: Zhigang Li, Shanghai Chest Hospital

Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Therapy: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

This is a prospectively randomized controlled trial to compare RAMIE and MIE in the treatment for locally advanced ESCC after neoadjuvant therapy. According to previous studies, long-term survival after RAMIE seemed to be at least comparable to MIE or open esophagectomy. Therefore, the RAMIE-2 study was designed as a non-inferiority trial, which was based on the hypothesis that the 5-year overall survival of patients who received RAMIE is uncompromised to MIE. To achieve the primary endpoint, 260 cases will be recruited in our hospital. Based on the volume of esophagectomy (1000 cases/year) and the proportion of patients with neoadjuvant therapy (50%) in our institution, approximately 10 patients will be enrolled for each group per month for this trial. The study will be performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. Written informed consent will be obtained from each participant. The flow chart of this trial is also presented.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical resection is the recommended treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, which could achieve a better R0 resection and overall survival. With the development of multidisciplinary treatment of esophageal cancer, especially the emerging concept of "watch and wait", surgery may only be a new era of salvage treatment for patients with poor response to neoadjuvant or recurrence after definitive treatment in the future. At that time, the technical advantage of RAMIE should be even more valuable. Early results of the RAMIE trial (conducted by our group)15, has demonstrated that RAMIE can achieve shorter operative time as well as better lymph node dissection in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, compared to conventional MIE. In addition, this benefit was more obviously observed in lymph nodes along the bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves, which were considered as the most challenging steps.

Therefore, we put forward a hypothesis: whether the robot's superior human-surgical interface is beneficial to achieve better surgical and oncological results in patients with locally advanced ESCC after neoadjuvant therapy. Based on the results of RAMIE trial, the present RAMIE-2 study is trying to answer such a question.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, SH 21
        • Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ranges from 18 to 75 years;
  2. European Clinical Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0-2;
  3. Histological subtype of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma;
  4. Primary tumors are located at the intrathoracic esophagus;
  5. Pre-treatment stage as cT1b-4aN1-3M0, cT3N0M0 (AJCC/UICC 8th Edition);
  6. With neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy;
  7. Without any anticancer therapy for other malignant diseases;
  8. Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cervical esophageal cancer and carcinoma of gastro-esophageal junction;
  2. Patients with unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer;
  3. Histological subtype of esophageal non-squamous cell carcinoma;
  4. History of previous thoracic surgery;
  5. Patients with other malignant tumor (previous or current);
  6. Participation in another clinical trial during this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy
Participants will received neoadjuvant therapy followed by robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy within 8 weeks.
Comparison between robotic and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy
Placebo Comparator: Thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy
Participants will received neoadjuvant therapy followed by thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy within 8 weeks.
Comparison between robotic and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: up to 5 years
defined as the time from the date of surgery to the day of death or to the last follow-up.
up to 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
disease-free survival
Time Frame: up to 5 year
defined as the time from the date of surgery to the day of tumor recurrence, tumor progression or death assessed up to 5 years
up to 5 year
oncologic results
Time Frame: 4 weeks
number of lymph nodes dissection, R0 resection rate
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zhigang Li, Dr., Shanghai Chest Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RAMIE-2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Procedure, Unspecified

Clinical Trials on ROBOTIC-ASSISTED ESOPHAGECTOMY

Subscribe