Supine Versus Prone PNL in Pediatric

August 22, 2023 updated by: Mostafa Kamel Abdel Rahman, Assiut University

Modified Flank-free Supine Versus Prone PNL in Pediatric Renal Stones: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial

To Compare the safety and efficacy of PNL in a modified flank-free supine position versus prone position in pediatric patients

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Incidence of pediatric urolithiasis varies from 5%-15% in developing countries to 1%-5% in the developed ones. The 5-year recurrence rate of about55% (range, 38%-70%). Fernstrom and Johansson first introduced percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in 1976. Since that PNL has become widely used for multiple indications. Pediatric PNL was done in the prone position with more rapid and easy puncture point determination, wider field for renal puncture, free application of multiple accesses, and avoidance of visceral injuries, especially the colon. PNL in the supine position has several advantages as, similar success rate and a shorter operative time than conventional PNL. The Amplatz sheath is oriented downward, maintaining a low pressure in the renal pelvis and reducing the fluid absorption with rapid drainage of the fragmented stones. Furthermore, it's easier for the anesthesiologist to control the airway and reduce the neural and ophthalmologic pressure lesions than the prone position. Desoky et al in 2012 described the flank-free modified supine position (FFMSP) and claimed that this position overcomes the mechanical limitation of ordinary supine position because of ample space for puncture, dilatation, multiple tracts, and maneuverability of the system with the nephoscope. Moreover, the surgeon can comfortably sit during the operation, and X-ray exposure is reduced because puncture and dilatation are quite perpendicular to the body, and the operator's hands are outside the fluoroscopic field. it's better to do supine PNL in case of retro renal colon. as we see the supine position in pediatric is still under research and few trials about it had been done with no clear recommendation, so we will compare PNL in pediatric age group in modified free flank supine position versus prone position.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 11751
        • Assiut University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Age ≤ 18 years old. Renal stones are amenable for PNL with Guy's stone score 1-2.

Exclusion Criteria:

congenital anomalies. skeletal anomalies. bleeding diathesis. active urinary tract infection. Patient refusing participation. Patients with PCN.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: modified supine PNL
patients doing FFMS PNL
percutaneous extraction of the stones in the kidney
Experimental: prone PNL
patients doing prone PNL
percutaneous extraction of the stones in the kidney

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
sucess rate
Time Frame: within 3 months post operative
stone free rate
within 3 months post operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
complication rate
Time Frame: 1 month
rate of patients develop complication
1 month
operative time
Time Frame: intraoperative
from the puncture untill the end
intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ahmed Eltaher, MD, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urolithiasis

Clinical Trials on PNL

Subscribe