Predicting Outcome of Cytoreduction in Advanced Ovarian Cancer (PREDAtOOR)

Predicting Outcome of Cytoreduction in Advanced Ovarian Cancer, Using a Machine Learning Algorithm and Patterns of Disease Distribution at Laparoscopy (PREDAtOOR)

PREDAtOOR is a pilot study and this study aims at improving the selection of the best treatment strategy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer by using Camera Vision (CV) to predict outcomes of cyto reduction at the time of Diagnostic laparoscopy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

For the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer, the decision to undergo primary surgery is complex and decided by the surgeon while multiple considering multiple elements. Sometimes, chemotherapy is needed before surgery to shrink some of the tumours. To choose the best patients for primary surgery, several prediction tools have been developed. CT and MRI have most commonly been used to identify sites and amounts of tumors in the abdomen and can help determine if these tumours can be safely removed by surgery. However, these imaging methods are only a prediction, and sometimes a diagnostic laparoscopy (putting a camera in the abdomen to look at all sites of disease) is performed to help this decision process.

With the introduction of artificial intelligence and machine learning, there is a possibility to create more precise prediction models using images from these diagnostic laparoscopy videos. In particular, the investigators would like to use images from the diagnostic laparoscopy to create machine-learning models to help predict if the tumours can be successfully taken out at primary surgery, or if chemotherapy before surgery would be needed.

The investigators will enroll patients at a one-time point (being the time of surgery) and follow them forward in time and There will be no additional visits other than the surgery.

During surgery time the surgical team takes images however, what makes this different is that these images will be used to help create an algorithm to predict surgical outcomes. These images will be stored in a secure database with an anonymous number not linking these pictures to any of the participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

151

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients treated at Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli Hospital, Rome Italy, Trillium -Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, Ontario and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
  • Patients fit for cytoreductive surgery
  • Patients with a primary diagnosis of suspect Stage III-IV ovarian cancer
  • Patients selected for interval cytoreductive surgery after NACT

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with pre-operative Stage I-II disease confined to the pelvis
  • Patients unfit for surgery
  • Lack of information about patients' surgical outcomes and clinicopathological characteristics
  • LGSOC, Clear cell and mucinous, non-epithelial histologic subtypes (if available)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Clinical Stage III-IV Ovarian Cancer
individuals who have been diagnosed or are suspected to have Clinical Stage III-IV Ovarian Cancer and CT and MRI have most commonly been used to identify sites and amounts of tumors in the abdomen and can help determine if these tumors can be safely removed by surgery. However, these imaging methods are only a prediction, and sometimes a diagnostic laparoscopy (putting a camera in the abdomen to look at all sites of disease) is performed to help this decision process.
With the introduction of artificial intelligence and machine learning, there is a possibility to create more precise prediction models using images from these diagnostic laparoscopy videos. In particular, it would like to use images from the diagnostic laparoscopy to create machine-learning models to help predict if the tumors can be successfully taken out at primary surgery, or if chemotherapy before surgery would be needed. During surgery time the surgical team takes images however, what makes this different is that these images will be used to help create an algorithm to predict surgical outcomes. These images will be stored in a secure database with an anonymous number not linking these pictures to any of the participants.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
a) Number of Participants with Treatment Diagnostic Laparoscopy assessed by Predictive Index Value.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The Fagotti score, also known as the Predictive Index Value (PIV), is determined through the evaluation of six abdominal areas during laparoscopic exploration. These areas include the parietal peritoneum, diaphragm, greater omentum, bowel, stomach/spleen/lesser omentum, and liver. A score of 2 is assigned to each area with visible tumor spread, allowing for a maximum score of 14. Notably, a PIV score of 10 or higher signifies a threshold for triaging patients toward neoadjuvant chemotherapy. To create a predictive model for cytoreduction outcomes during diagnostic laparoscopy, advanced deep neural networks will be trained. This aims to automate PIV score assessment using a fully supervised approach and deduce features from images obtained during diagnostic laparoscopy to predict the possibility of a resection target above 1 cm or a lack of indication for cytoreductive surgery in a weekly supervised manner.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
b)Number of Participants with Treatment Diagnostic Laparoscopy assessed by utilizing machine learning and computer vision models to analyze images and videos
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The laparoscopic evaluation also demonstrated its efficacy in foreseeing surgical outcomes for patients undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). However, this model remains vulnerable to the subjectivity inherent in each surgeon's evaluation of individual disease sites. Evaluating patients during intraoperative procedures during diagnostic laparoscopy often relies on a surgeon's judgment, which may not always be optimally trained for such evaluations and can be influenced by biases. Utilizing CV models can involve training them to automatically replicate expert assessments, providing more accurate evaluations for a larger patient population.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1. Number of Participants with treatment Diagnostic Laparoscopy assessed the images and videos by validating and/or updating an ML model.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The most promising machine learning (ML) models for preoperatively predicting cytoreduction outcomes have been recently identified through a systematic review. These models will undergo validation using the dataset and annotations gathered in this project. If required, the model will be further refined and updated to enhance its performance. Given that there are multiple variables of various natures (such as clinical characteristics, laboratory values, radiological features, and intraoperative findings) that impact cytoreductive surgery outcomes, ML models are well-suited for handling extensive sets of variables, particularly when the relationships between them are non-linear. The goal is to develop a predictive model for cytoreduction outcomes based on clinical characteristics, laboratory values, and radiological features.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anna Fagotti, Prof, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ovarian Cancer Stage IV

Clinical Trials on Artificial Intelligence

Subscribe