Investigation of the Effect of Foot Muscle Fatigue on the Foot Sole and Tendon Structural Properties

September 6, 2023 updated by: Simge Dönmez

Investigation of the Acute Effect of Foot Extrinsic Muscle Fatigue on Viscoelastic Properties of the Plantar Fascia and Achilles Tendon

In healthy individuals, fatigue in the foot muscles increases the load and stress on the feet. The extrinsic muscles of the foot, which investigators aimed to create fatigue in this study, are closely related anatomically and functionally to the plantar fascia and Achilles tendon. Considering that fatigue or weakness of the foot extrinsic muscles is an important risk factor for foot-ankle pathologies, it is important to reveal the relationship with the plantar fascia and Achilles tendon in healthy sedentary individuals and to determine mechanical properties of the feet of the participants to prevent possible foot injuries. Therefore, the aim of this study is to show the acute effects of fatigue in the extrinsic muscles of the foot on the viscoelastic properties of the plantar fascia and Achilles tendon. The study was completed with 19 people who met the inclusion criteria. Before starting the study, the dominant foot of the participants was determined, physical activity level was determined, foot posture index and foot posture were evaluated, navicular height and fall distance of the foot were measured, m.gastrocnemius shortness was measured with the Silfverskiöld test, flexibility was evaluated with a baseline sitting bench, tendon and fascia measurements were made with the MyotonPRO device. After the measurements, the participant was trained to perform the heel raise exercise. When the exercise was completed, the participant's foot Myoton measurements were repeated. One week later, pre-exercise Myoton measurement was performed, then the participant was trained for the foot adduction exercise. When the exercise was completed, the participant's foot Myotone measurements were repeated. In another week, pre-exercise Myotone measurement was performed, then heel raising and foot adduction exercises were performed sequentially. When the exercise was completed, the participant's foot Myoton measurements were repeated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was carried out on healthy, sedentary male individuals between the ages of 18-35. In the power analysis to estimate the sample size, Usgu et al. (2020), it was determined that there should be a minimum of 17 observations in each group, with a statistical power level of 82.2% and a significance level of 5%. The study was completed in 3 groups in line with the selected exercises. Firstly, 42 young individuals were included in the study. However, after the preliminary evaluation, 23 individuals who did not meet the inclusion criteria and did not provide continuity to the study were excluded from the study. This study was completed with 19 healthy male individuals with a mean age of 21.37(SD 2.21) years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Uskudar
      • İstanbul, Uskudar, Turkey, 34862
        • University of Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Agreeing to participate in the study voluntarily
  • Being a healthy, sedentary male individual between the ages of 18 and 35
  • Being in categories 1 and 2 according to the International Physical Activity Survey (UFAA)
  • Having a normal Body Mass Index (BMI) (18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI ≤24.9 kg/m2)
  • Having a neutral foot posture (<6 points in the Foot Posture Index)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusing to participate in the study or wanting to leave the study
  • Having a history of previous surgery in the lower extremity
  • Being diagnosed with a musculoskeletal disease
  • Having any chronic disease (hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, rheumatism, etc.)
  • Having a skin lesion in the area to be measured
  • Significant weakness in the lower extremity gross muscle test
  • Any limitation in the normal range of motion of the lower extremity
  • Having any deformity in the foot (pes planus, pes cavus, hallux valgus)
  • Navicular drop distance ≥10 mm
  • Limitation in the range of motion of the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (hallux rigidus-limitus)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Unilateral Heel Raise
Muscle fatigue was created by exercise consisting of a combination of repetitive plantar flexion and dorsiflexion movements performed during the entire range of motion of the ankle at the frequency of movement determined by the metronome on one step.
MyotonPro™, a handheld, non-invasive and painless device, is used for non-invasive measurement of the biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of soft biological tissues such as superficial skeletal muscles, fascia, tendons and ligaments. The properties of the structures can be measured from different regions during complete rest or contraction.
Experimental: Closed Chain Resisted Foot Adduction
The exercise was performed on the designed wooden assembly. The device was used to maintain the neutral position of the subtalar joint, stabilize the lateral and medial malleoli, and prevent compensation with the knee and hip joints. Individuals were seated with the knee flexed approximately 80 degrees and separated from the other extremity by the length of the forearm, and the contralateral knee was stabilized with the ipsilateral hand. The foot was brought from the abduction position to the adduction position and the heel was not lifted from the ground throughout the movement. The exercise was performed using a green elastic band.The movement was performed in sets of 50 concentric/eccentric contractions. A rest period of 10 seconds was added between each set.
MyotonPro™, a handheld, non-invasive and painless device, is used for non-invasive measurement of the biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of soft biological tissues such as superficial skeletal muscles, fascia, tendons and ligaments. The properties of the structures can be measured from different regions during complete rest or contraction.
Experimental: Combined Exercise
Unilateral Heel Raise and Closed Chain Resisted Foot Adduction exercises were performed sequentially.
MyotonPro™, a handheld, non-invasive and painless device, is used for non-invasive measurement of the biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of soft biological tissues such as superficial skeletal muscles, fascia, tendons and ligaments. The properties of the structures can be measured from different regions during complete rest or contraction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of tissue
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of AT and PF were performed using MyotonPro™ (Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia) device. Before and immediately after the application of the fatigue protocol, AT and PF measurements were made separately with the MyotonPro™ device. The measurement points determined for AT and PF of individuals during rest were marked with a medical marker pen (16). The measurement points of each person and their distances to the anatomical points were measured with the help of a tape measure and recorded in their files to find the same point again. During the measurement, the probe of the device was adjusted to pulse once into the skin with a force of 0.4 N and for 15 ms. During the test, the tip of the MyotonPro™ device was placed perpendicular to the marked area and gently pressed against the skin at a depth of 3 mm until the green light came on.
3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identifying the Dominant Foot
Time Frame: 1 day

The dominant foot was determined using the ball-kicking method. While the individual was standing, a ball was placed in the middle of both feet and the individual was asked to hit the ball with his foot. The extremity on which the individual hit the ball was accepted as dominant.

The dominant foot was determined using the ball-kicking method. While the individual was standing, a ball was placed in the middle of both feet and the individual was asked to hit the ball with his foot. The extremity on which the individual hit the ball was accepted as dominant.

1 day
Sit-Reach Test
Time Frame: 1 day
In particular, a sit-reach bench (Baseline®, Cooper Institute/YMCA, AAHPERD, New York, USA) was used to measure the flexibility of the lower back and hamstring muscles. Subjects were asked to contact a standard sit-and-reach bench in a sitting position, with their backs against the wall and their knees in full extension, with the soles of their feet flat on the box. Then, individuals were asked to reach forward as far as possible by pushing the device apparatus with their fingertips without lifting their knees, with their palms facing down. Measurements were repeated 3 times and the average of the values was recorded.
1 day
Silfverskiold Test
Time Frame: 1 day
The muscle shortness assessment of the individuals regarding M. Gastrocnemius was performed on both ankles while in the supine position using the Silfverskiold method and universal goniometer. While the knee joint was in full extension and 90° flexion, and the subtalar joint was in the neutral position, the dorsiflexion of the ankle was passively performed by the assessor, and the fixed arm of the universal goniometer was measured on the fibula shaft and the mobile arm was placed on the fifth metatarsal shaft. The resulting angles were recorded in degrees.
1 day
Navicular Height
Time Frame: 1 day
The navicular height was defined as the distance of the navicular tubercle to the ground when the individual was standing in a relaxed position. In our study; Subjects were asked to stand in a comfortable position for navicular height assessment. The medial protrusion of the tuberosity of the navicular was detected and marked by palpation, and the distance between this point and the ground was measured using a millimetric ruler. The result is recorded in millimeters
1 day
Navicular Drop Distance
Time Frame: 1 day
Before the measurement, the medial protrusion of the tuberosity of the navicular was detected and marked by palpation. The height of the navicular tubercle was determined with the help of a millimetric ruler placed on the medial part of the foot while the individuals were sitting in a chair with the soles of their feet touching the ground and the hips and knees flexed to 90°. Individuals were asked to stand up and the height of the navicular tubercle was determined again. The amount of change was determined with the help of a ruler and recorded. Each measurement was repeated 3 times and the average value was recorded in millimeters.
1 day
Evaluation of Foot Posture
Time Frame: 1 day
Foot Posture Index-6 was used to evaluate foot posture. During the evaluation, the subjects were asked to stand in a way that was comfortable, without moving. Test; It was performed by the physiotherapist based on observation and palpation while the individual was in a static and comfortable standing position. The index consists of 6 items in total, 3 items in the forefoot and 3 items in the hindfoot. In the study; Evaluations were made bilaterally based on observation and palpation from the posterior, medial, lateral and anterior aspects.
1 day
Physical Activity Level
Time Frame: 1 day
The physical activity level of the individuals was evaluated with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-Short Form. This scale, whose short form consists of 7 items, provides information about the time spent during the activity by classifying the activity according to the differences in intensity level. Total Physical Activity Score; The vigorous and moderate physical activity and walking times of the participants in the last 7 days were calculated with the formulas by multiplying the minutes, the number of days and the MET-minute score appropriate for the physical activity performed (MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task)-min/week). According to the questionnaire, physical activity levels are those who are not physically active (<600 MET-min/week), low physical activity level (600-3000 MET-min/week) and adequate physical activity level (beneficial for health) (> 3000 MET-min/week).
1 day
Evaluation of Fatigue
Time Frame: 3 weeks
The level of fatigue perceived by the individuals during the study was evaluated with the "Borg Fatigue Scale" immediately after completing the fatigue protocol exercises. Developed by Borg, this scale has 10 levels in its modified form, and the category ratio scale consists of definitions corresponding to certain numbers. The participant was asked to score the perceived fatigue between 0 (not at all) and 10 (very very hard).
3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Simge Dönmez, Kütahya Health Sciences University
  • Principal Investigator: Fatmagül Varol, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 5, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 23, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11-959

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Participants

Clinical Trials on Evaluation of Viscoelastic and mechanical properties with MyotonPRO

3
Subscribe