Breathomics: May it Become an Affordable, New Tool for Early Diagnosis and Screening of Lung Cancer?

Breathomics: May it Become an Affordable, New Tool for Early Diagnosis and Screening of Lung Cancer? An Exploratory Study on a Cohort of 60 Patients

Breath analysis examining specific patterns of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) has been demonstrated to be able to discriminate lung cancer (LC) patients from healthy controls (HC). However, the existing technology uses complex, expensive, and low throughput analytical platforms to give an offline response, thus preventing its applicability for mass screening. The reliability of a new portable device to enable rapid, on-site LC diagnosis is tested.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The breath of patients with histologically proven NSCLC and healthy controls was sampled into Tedlar bags through a Nafion filter and a one-way mouthpiece. The breath samples in the bags were then analyzed by an automated micro portable gas chromatography device developed in-house, which consisted of a thermal desorption tube, thermal injector, separation column, and photoionization detector, as well as other accessories such as pumps, valves, and a helium cartridge. The chromatograms were analyzed by chemometrics and machine learning techniques.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bari, Italy, 70121
        • Azienda Consorziale Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari - Thoracic Surgery Unit

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A total of 60 patients undergoing surgery for histologically proven NSCLC and a comparative group of non-cancer controls who had negative findings on preoperative chest X-rays/chest CT scan were admitted to our Thoracic Surgery Unit between August 2021 and March 2022. Patients underwent breath collection during the pre-hospitalization analysis before surgery. The control group was recruited from patients undergoing surgery for benign extra-thoracic disease who had undergone chest X-rays/chest CT-scan, proved to be negative during preoperative evaluation.

Patients excluded from analysis were those who had any history of another type of cancer and those who had received neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy because of the possible unknown effects on cancer metabolism.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • NSCLC histologically proven (for LC group) at any stage of disease
  • non-cancer controls who had negative findings on preoperative chest X-rays/chest CT scan (for HC groups)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had any history of another type of cancer
  • who had received neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy because of the possible unknown effects on cancer metabolism
  • pediatric patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Lung Cancer Patients
patients undergoing surgery for histologically proven NSCLC
Patients were asked to orally exhale 1-2 L breath into a 5 L Tedlar bag via a one-way mouthpiece and Nafion filter for moisture removal, as shown in Figure 1B. The process usually takes about a few minutes. The breath analysis took place either in-situ immediately after the breath sample collection or within 24 h of breath collection. The Tedlar bags were stored under ambient condition until analyzed. During the breath analysis, the Tedlar bag was connected to the sampling port of the portable GC (Figure 1C). Approximately 350 mL of breath was pulled from the Tedlar bag into the GC for analysis. The GC operation was controlled using LabView via a laptop. The total assay time was 30 min, including 5 min of breath sampling time from the Tedlar bag at a flow rate of 70 mL/min (see the blue path in Figure 1A), 5 min of desorption/transfer time, 10 min of chromatographic separation time (see the orange path in Figure 1A), and 10 min of GC system cleaning time.
Healthy Control Patients
patients undergoing surgery for benign extra-thoracic disease who had undergone chest X-rays/chest CT-scan, proved to be negative during preoperative evaluation.
Patients were asked to orally exhale 1-2 L breath into a 5 L Tedlar bag via a one-way mouthpiece and Nafion filter for moisture removal, as shown in Figure 1B. The process usually takes about a few minutes. The breath analysis took place either in-situ immediately after the breath sample collection or within 24 h of breath collection. The Tedlar bags were stored under ambient condition until analyzed. During the breath analysis, the Tedlar bag was connected to the sampling port of the portable GC (Figure 1C). Approximately 350 mL of breath was pulled from the Tedlar bag into the GC for analysis. The GC operation was controlled using LabView via a laptop. The total assay time was 30 min, including 5 min of breath sampling time from the Tedlar bag at a flow rate of 70 mL/min (see the blue path in Figure 1A), 5 min of desorption/transfer time, 10 min of chromatographic separation time (see the orange path in Figure 1A), and 10 min of GC system cleaning time.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in VOCs peaks in patients with lung cancer vs healthy patients
Time Frame: 24 hours
Identify biomarkers able to discriminate between lung cancer patients and healthy controls.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Giuseppe Marulli, MD, PhD, Humanitas Research Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

On request alla data will be available

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Portable GC device for brath analysis

Subscribe