- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06038747
Self-monitoring and Reflection's Impact on Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Trial Protocol.
November 15, 2024 updated by: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Investigating the Impact of Regular Self-monitoring and Reflecting on Affective Reactions Toward the Psychotherapist on Treatment Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.
The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the influence of a brief post-session battery, designed to foster patient self-monitoring and reflection on their emotional reactions toward their psychotherapist, on the quality of the therapeutic relationship and treatment outcomes.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The quality of the therapeutic relationship is critical in determining psychotherapy outcomes.
However, facilitating patients' self-awareness and reflection on their affective responses to their therapist remains understudied as a potential tool for enhancing this relationship and subsequent treatment outcomes.
The primary objective of this study is to examine the influence of a brief post-session battery, designed to foster patient self-monitoring and reflection on their emotional reactions toward their psychotherapist, on the quality of the therapeutic relationship and treatment outcomes.
Using an observational randomized control trial design, participants will be allocated into intervention and control groups.
Those in the intervention group will complete a postsession battery following each therapy session, while the control group will only undergo regular treatment.
Data collection will be facilitated through the Qualtrics online survey software and span baseline, mid-trial (5th week), and end-of-trial (10th week) assessments.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
520
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
- Researchforme.Unc.Edu
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
- Researchmatch.org
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- being aged 18 years or older,
- being fluent in English,
- being currently under individual psychotherapy with a minimum frequency of two sessions per month.
Exclusion Criteria:
- having a legal guardian.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Individual Psychotherapy + Self-Monitoring
Participants in the intervention group will continue their regular individual psychotherapy sessions.
Additionally, after each session, they will complete a brief postsession battery consisting of two scales on the affective reactions of the participants towards their therapist during session and read general feedback encouraging them to discuss their feelings and reflections with their therapist.
This questionnaire aims to prompt reflection on the own experience of the therapeutic relationship.
|
The post-session battery consists of two self-report scales measuring both positive and negative affective reactions of the participants toward their therapist during the therapy session.
The general feedback is a brief text that encourages participants to share and discuss their feelings and reflections with their therapist.
Individual psychotherapy sessions
|
|
Active Comparator: Individual Psychotherapy
Participants in the control group will receive only treatment as usual (i.e., individual psychotherapy) sand and will not complete post-session questionnaires.
Additionally, they will not receive any feedback at all encouraging them to discuss their emotional responses with their therapist during the session.
|
Individual psychotherapy sessions
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (Total score) from baseline to 5 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 weeks
|
Measure of psychological distress devised to be administered during a course of psychotherapeutic treatment to determine treatment response.
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a 34-item self-report measure of change in psychotherapy.
Total score ranges 0-136.
Higher scores represent poorer overall functioning.
|
Baseline, 5 weeks
|
|
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (Total score) from baseline to 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
|
Measure of psychological distress devised to be administered during a course of psychotherapeutic treatment to determine treatment response.
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a 34-item self-report measure of change in psychotherapy.
Total score ranges 0-136.
Higher scores represent poorer overall functioning.
|
Baseline, 10 weeks
|
|
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (Total score) from 5 weeks to 10 weeks
Time Frame: 5 weeks, 10 weeks.
|
Measure of psychological distress devised to be administered during a course of psychotherapeutic treatment to determine treatment response.
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a 34-item self-report measure of change in psychotherapy.
Total score ranges 0-136.
Higher scores represent poorer overall functioning.
|
5 weeks, 10 weeks.
|
|
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (Subjective well-being deficits) from baseline to 5 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 weeks.
|
Measure of psychological distress devised to be administered during a course of psychotherapeutic treatment to determine treatment response.
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a self-report measure of change in psychotherapy.
The subjective well-being subscale score ranges 0-16).
Higher scores represent poorer subjective well-being.
|
Baseline, 5 weeks.
|
|
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (Subjective well-being deficits) from baseline to 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks.
|
Measure of psychological distress devised to be administered during a course of psychotherapeutic treatment to determine treatment response.
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a self-report measure of change in psychotherapy.
The subjective well-being subscale score ranges 0-16).
Higher scores represent poorer subjective well-being.
|
Baseline, 10 weeks.
|
|
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (Subjective well-being deficits) from 5 weeks to 10 weeks
Time Frame: 5 weeks, 10 weeks.
|
Measure of psychological distress devised to be administered during a course of psychotherapeutic treatment to determine treatment response.
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a self-report measure of change in psychotherapy.
The subjective well-being subscale score ranges 0-16).
Higher scores represent poorer subjective well-being.
|
5 weeks, 10 weeks.
|
|
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (Problems/symptoms) from baseline to 5 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 weeks.
|
Measure of psychological distress devised to be administered during a course of psychotherapeutic treatment to determine treatment response.
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a self-report measure of change in psychotherapy.
The problems/symptoms subscale score ranges 0-48).
Higher scores represent greater problems/symptoms.
|
Baseline, 5 weeks.
|
|
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (Problems/symptoms) from baseline to 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks.
|
Measure of psychological distress devised to be administered during a course of psychotherapeutic treatment to determine treatment response.
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a self-report measure of change in psychotherapy.
The problems/symptoms subscale score ranges 0-48).
Higher scores represent greater problems/symptoms.
|
Baseline, 10 weeks.
|
|
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (Problems/symptoms) from 5 weeks to 10 weeks
Time Frame: 5 weeks, 10 weeks.
|
Measure of psychological distress devised to be administered during a course of psychotherapeutic treatment to determine treatment response.
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a self-report measure of change in psychotherapy.
The problems/symptoms subscale score ranges 0-48).
Higher scores represent greater problems/symptoms.
|
5 weeks, 10 weeks.
|
|
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (Life functioning difficulties) from baseline to 5 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 weeks.
|
Measure of psychological distress devised to be administered during a course of psychotherapeutic treatment to determine treatment response.
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a self-report measure of change in psychotherapy.
The life functioning difficulties subscale score ranges 0-48).
Higher scores represent greater life functioning difficulties.
|
Baseline, 5 weeks.
|
|
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (Life functioning difficulties) from baseline to 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks.
|
Measure of psychological distress devised to be administered during a course of psychotherapeutic treatment to determine treatment response.
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a self-report measure of change in psychotherapy.
The life functioning difficulties subscale score ranges 0-48).
Higher scores represent greater life functioning difficulties.
|
Baseline, 10 weeks.
|
|
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (Life functioning difficulties) from 5 weeks to 10 weeks
Time Frame: 5 weeks, 10 weeks.
|
Measure of psychological distress devised to be administered during a course of psychotherapeutic treatment to determine treatment response.
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a self-report measure of change in psychotherapy.
The life functioning difficulties subscale score ranges 0-48).
Higher scores represent greater life functioning difficulties.
|
5 weeks, 10 weeks.
|
|
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (Risk/harm) from baseline to 5 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 weeks.
|
Measure of psychological distress devised to be administered during a course of psychotherapeutic treatment to determine treatment response.
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a self-report measure of change in psychotherapy.
The risk/harm subscale score ranges 0-26).
Higher scores represent greater risk/harm.
|
Baseline, 5 weeks.
|
|
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (Risk/harm) from baseline to 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks.
|
Measure of psychological distress devised to be administered during a course of psychotherapeutic treatment to determine treatment response.
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a self-report measure of change in psychotherapy.
The risk/harm subscale score ranges 0-26).
Higher scores represent greater risk/harm.
|
Baseline, 10 weeks.
|
|
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (Risk/harm) from 5 weeks to 10 weeks
Time Frame: 5 weeks, 10 weeks.
|
Measure of psychological distress devised to be administered during a course of psychotherapeutic treatment to determine treatment response.
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a self-report measure of change in psychotherapy.
The risk/harm subscale score ranges 0-26).
Higher scores represent greater risk/harm.
|
5 weeks, 10 weeks.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Real Relationship Inventory-Client-Short form (Total score)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks.
|
Measure of the real relationship between a therapist and participant from the participant's viewpoint.
The Real Relationship Inventory-Client-Short form (RRI-C-SF) is an 8-item self-report measure of the quality of the real relationship and includes two subscales: Genuineness and Realism, both of which represent closely related dimensions of authenticity and perceptual accuracy within the therapeutic relationship.
Total score ranges 0-40.
Higher scores represent better quality of the real relationship.
It will be assessed at baseline, mid-trial (5 weeks), and end-of-trial (10 weeks).
|
Up to 10 weeks.
|
|
Real Relationship Inventory-Client-Short form (Genuineness)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks.
|
Measure of the real relationship between a therapist and participant from the participant's viewpoint.
The Real Relationship Inventory-Client-Short form (RRI-C-SF) is an 8-item self-report measure of the quality of the real relationship and includes two subscales: Genuineness and Realism, both of which represent closely related dimensions of authenticity and perceptual accuracy within the therapeutic relationship.
The Genuineness subscale (3 items) score ranges 0-20.
Higher scores represent higher perceived genuineness.
It will be assessed at baseline, mid-trial (5 weeks), and end-of-trial (10 weeks).
|
Up to 10 weeks.
|
|
Real Relationship Inventory-Client-Short form (Realism)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks.
|
Measure of the real relationship between a therapist and participant from the participant's viewpoint.
The Real Relationship Inventory-Client-Short form (RRI-C-SF) is an 8-item self-report measure of the quality of the real relationship and includes two subscales: Genuineness and Realism, both of which represent closely related dimensions of authenticity and perceptual accuracy within the therapeutic relationship.
The Realism subscale (4 items) score range 0-20.
Higher scores represent higher perceived realism.
It will be assessed at baseline, mid-trial (5 weeks), and end-of-trial (10 weeks).
|
Up to 10 weeks.
|
|
Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (Total score)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks.
|
Measure of the working alliance between a therapist and participant from the participant's viewpoint.
The Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR) is a 12-item self-report measure of the quality of the working alliance and includes three subscales: goal, task, and bond.
Total score ranges 0-72.
Higher scores indicate a stronger alliance.
It will be assessed at baseline, mid-trial (5 weeks), and end-of-trial (10 weeks).
|
Up to 10 weeks.
|
|
Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (Goal)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks.
|
Measure of the working alliance between a therapist and participant from the participant's viewpoint.
The Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR) is a 12-item self-report measure of the quality of the working alliance.
The Goal subscale (3 items) score ranges 0-18.
Higher scores indicate a stronger agreement on the tasks of therapy.
It will be assessed at baseline, mid-trial (5 weeks), and end-of-trial (10 weeks).
|
Up to 10 weeks.
|
|
Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (Task)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks.
|
Measure of the working alliance between a therapist and participant from the participant's viewpoint.
The Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR) is a 12-item self-report measure of the quality of the working alliance.
The Task subscale score (3 items) ranges 0-18.
Higher scores indicate a stronger agreement on the tasks of therapy.
It will be assessed at baseline, mid-trial (5 weeks), and end-of-trial (10 weeks).
|
Up to 10 weeks.
|
|
Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (Bond)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks.
|
Measure of the working alliance between a therapist and participant from the participant's viewpoint.
The Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR) is a 12-item self-report measure of the quality of the working alliance.
The Bond subscale score (3 items) ranges 0-18.
Higher scores indicate a stronger affective bond between the patient and the therapist.
It will be assessed at baseline, mid-trial (5 weeks), and end-of-trial (10 weeks).
|
Up to 10 weeks.
|
|
Number of sessions missed or canceled
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks.
|
Number of scheduled psychotherapy sessions that have been missed or canceled by the participant.
It will be assessed at baseline, mid-trial (5 weeks), and end-of-trial (10 weeks).
|
Up to 10 weeks.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Alberto Stefana, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 15, 2023
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 23, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
January 23, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 8, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
September 15, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
November 20, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 15, 2024
Last Verified
November 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 23-1067
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
The Study protocol article will be published before data collection completion.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following the publication of the research reports.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Investigator has approved IRB, IEC), or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Psychotherapy
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedPsychotherapyUnited States
-
Empower Research IncMitacs; Empower Psychedelics; Centre for Neurology Studies, CanadaRecruiting
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Fundació Sant Joan de DéuHospital Sant Joan de DeuActive, not recruitingManual of Emotional Regulation and Interpersonal Abilities in Children and Adolescents Group TherapyDomestic Violence | Psychotherapy, Group | WitnessSpain
-
Shalvata Mental Health CenterUnknownMental Health | Psychotherapy | MonitoringIsrael
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRecruitingPsychotherapy | Integrative MedicineUnited States
-
University of OttawaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)CompletedPsychotherapy | Therapeutic AllianceCanada
-
The Common Factors, Responsiveness and Outcome...University of Copenhagen; TRYG Foundation; The Health Foundation; the Danish Psychological...RecruitingPsychological Distress | Mental Health | General PsychotherapyDenmark
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreCompletedAmputation | Mental Health | Psychotherapy, GroupCanada
-
University Hospital HeidelbergCompletedPsychotherapy | Treatment Outcome | Attachment | Self Disclosure
Clinical Trials on Self-Monitoring
-
Stanford UniversityNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)CompletedObesity | Overweight | Weight Loss | Health BehaviorUnited States
-
University of PittsburghCompletedDepression | Mood Disorders | Anxiety | Health Behavior | Grief | BereavementUnited States
-
The Miriam HospitalNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)RecruitingObesity & OverweightUnited States
-
Boston CollegeNortheastern University; Brandeis UniversityCompletedPhysical Activity | Sedentary LifestyleUnited States
-
Penn State UniversityStony Brook University; National Institute on Aging (NIA); Oregon State University and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center at...National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)CompletedHypertensionUnited States
-
Institut PasteurTerminated
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillBristol-Myers Squibb FoundationCompletedAtrial Fibrillation New OnsetUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedPhysical Activity | Social MediaUnited States
-
University of MichiganCompletedHealth Behavior | Eating Disorders | Mental Health Wellness 2United States