Diagnostic Accuracy of Arterial-alveolar Oxygen Gradient in Low Risk Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism (DAGPE)

September 18, 2023 updated by: Franciscus Gasthuis

Introduction:

The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) is a challenge in the Emergency Department. D-dimer based diagnostic algorithms for PE have a very high sensitivity, but rely upon a vast amount of CT angiography and potentially unnecessary exposure to radiation. An accurate diagnostic algorithm that does not involve d-dimer testing might reduce this burden.

An abnormal Alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (A-a gradient) seems to increase the chance of PE. However, a normal A-a gradient on its own does not exclude the diagnosis. In this paper, the accuracy of A-a gradient testing and a combination of Years criteria with A-a gradient testing will be assessed.

Methods:

This is a prospective, single center, observational study. All patients that present at our emergency department from September 2022 until September 2023 with a suspicion of pulmonary embolism will be analyzed for eligibility and included in the study after informed consent. The aim is to include at least 230 patients in the study.

Analysis: The primary outcome is the diagnostic accuracy of a YEARS and A-a gradient based algorithm for pulmonary embolism. The secondary outcome is the potential decrease in performed imaging in order to exclude pulmonary embolism.

Valorisation An accurate A-a gradient-based algorithm for pulmonary embolism in low risk patients will be a step towards an improved clinical risk score. We aim to reduce the amount of diagnostic imaging, i.e. CT-angiography. Meaning less, potentially unnecessary, exposure to radiation for the patient. Furthermore, it could lower healthcare costs by reducing expensive diagnostic imaging.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

230

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Sophie Nieuwendijk

Study Locations

      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Franciscus Gasthuis
        • Contact:
          • Sander Mol
          • Phone Number: +31104616161
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rick Thissen
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sophie Nieuwendijk
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Renee Deckers

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients that present in our emergency department with suspicion of pulmonary embolism

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with suspected pulmonary embolism
  • Emergency department D-dimer result available
  • Arterial blood gas available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients without documented oxygen suppletion durig blood gas measurement
  • Patients without documented and insufficient data to calculate YEARS criteria
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Suspected PE
Patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Standard care: Laboratory result (D-dimer and astrup). CT scan for pulmonary embolism if indicated
Other Names:
  • CT-scan for pulmonary embolism

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of a combination of a normal Alveolar-Arterial Oxygen Gradient with negative YEARS criteria in patients with suspected pumonary embolism
Time Frame: At submission in the Emergency Department
At submission in the Emergency Department

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
How many CT-scans would have been avoided if the algorithm was used in normal practice
Time Frame: At submission in the Emergency Department
At submission in the Emergency Department

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Sander Mol, Franciscus Gasthuis

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Embolism

Clinical Trials on Laboratory testing: D-dimeer and astrup

Subscribe