Novel Amblyopia Treatment With Virtual Reality Games

July 17, 2025 updated by: Marjean Kulp

Novel Amblyopia Treatment With Dichoptic, Disparity-guided, Hand-Eye Coordination Enhanced, Serious, Virtual Reality Games

The goal of this study is to compare the change in amblyopic eye acuity between treatment periods in children with amblyopia, aged 5-17 years. The main question it aims to answer is:

Is a 16-week course of amblyopia treatment using Vivid Vision Therapeutic (Dichoptic) Virtual Reality Games for approx. 25 min/day, 6 days/week more effective for improvement in amblyopic-eye VA, binocularity (stereoacuity, suppression, alignment), contrast sensitivity, attention, oculomotor function, visual-motor integration, and quality of life than 16 weeks of continued glasses alone?

Participants will each serve as their own control and complete:

Treatment period 1: Continued optical correction (glasses) alone for 16 weeks; Treatment period 2: Vivid Vision Therapeutic (Dichoptic) Virtual Reality Games for 16 weeks (approx. 25min/day, 6 days/week) plus continued optical correction

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Marjean T Kulp, OD, MS
  • Phone Number: 614-688-3336
  • Email: kulp.6@osu.edu

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Recruiting
        • The Ohio State University College of Optometry
        • Contact:
          • Marjean T Kulp, OD, MS
          • Phone Number: 614-688-3336
          • Email: kulp.6@osu.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients ages 5 to 17 years of age

  • Moderate to severe unilateral amblyopia (logMAR best corrected visual acuity 0.3 to 1.3) associated with anisometropia and/or strabismus of ≤5pd
  • Age normal VA in the nonamblyopic eye
  • Spectacle correction (if required) worn for at least 16 weeks, or until stability of VA is demonstrated (<0.1 logMAR change by the same testing method measured on 2 exams at least 8 weeks apart)
  • Interocular difference of ≥ 3 lines
  • No amblyopia treatment in the past 2 weeks
  • An interpupillary distance of 52-72 mm (inclusive)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Myopia greater than -6.00 diopters (D) spherical equivalent in either eye.
  • Previous intraocular or refractive surgery.
  • Previous dichoptic treatment > 2 weeks in duration
  • Ocular co-morbidity that may reduce visual acuity determined by an ocular examination performed within the past 7 months (Note: nystagmus per se does not exclude the participant if the above visual acuity criteria are met).
  • Diplopia more than once per week over the last week prior to enrollment by parental report.
  • Down syndrome or cerebral palsy.
  • Light-induced seizures
  • Known simulator sickness
  • Severe developmental delay that would interfere with treatment or evaluation (in the opinion of the investigator). Participants with mild speech delay or reading and/or learning disabilities are not excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Optical Correction alone
Optical correction alone (16 weeks) (Each participant will complete both study conditions.)
Optical correction (if needed)
Experimental: Therapeutic (Dichoptic) Virtual Reality Games plus Continued Optical Correction
Therapeutic (Dichoptic) Virtual Reality Games plus continued optical correction (16 weeks) (Each participant will complete both study conditions.)
Optical correction (if needed)
Virtual Reality Game play for amblyopia treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in Mean Change in Amblyopic Eye Visual Acuity
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks
Optical correction worn for testing using Amblyopia Treatment Study (ATS) protocol; HOTV for ages 5-6 years; E-ETDRS for ages 7 years and older
Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in Change in Stereoacuity/Binocularity
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks
Optical correction worn for testing. Stereoacuity scores (seconds of arc) calculated based on the Randot Butterfly (scores: 2000, Nil) and Randot Preschool stereoacuity (scores: 800, 400, 200, 100, 60 and 40) tests. Lower scores indicate better stereoacuity. Nil (4000) defined as an incorrect response (or lack of an attempt) on the butterfly without a correct response on 800 seconds of arc level of Randot Preschool stereoacuity test. Stereoacuity scores will be ordered and assigned a rank score. Change in stereoacuity will be calculated as the difference in change in ranked score.
Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks
Difference in Mean Change in Amblyopic-Eye Contrast Sensitivity
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks
Optical correction worn for testing. Spot Checks;Contrast sensitivity scores range from unable (<0.90), and then from 0.90 to 2.05 (by 0.05 log contrast sensitivity units).
Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks
Difference in Mean Change in Attention
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks
Optical correction worn for testing. The Children's Color Trails Test (CCTT) is a neuropsychological standardized test that measures attention, divided attention, and speed of mental processing.
Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks
Difference in Mean Change in reading eye movements
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks
Optical correction worn for testing with Readalyzer eye tracker.
Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks
Difference in Mean Change in visual-motor integration
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks
Optical correction worn for testing. Beery Visual-Motor Integration; standard scores with mean of 100, standard deviation of 15
Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks
Difference in Mean Change in Pediatric Eye Questionnaire (PedEyeQ)
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks
Pediatric Eye Questionnaire (PedEyeQ) domain score; scores for questionnaire items will be obtained from published look-up tables available at www.pedig.net; scaled to score from 0 to 100 (worst to best)
Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 14, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amblyopia

Clinical Trials on Optical Correction

Subscribe