Post Gingival Depigmentation Assessment: Comparison of Surgical Stripping vs (Er,Cr:YSGG) Laser

October 4, 2023 updated by: Talal Zahid, King Abdulaziz University

Comparison of Surgical Stripping and Erbium, Chromium:Yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) Laser Techniques for Gingival Depigmentation Recurrence: A Randomized Clinical Trial, Four Years Follow up

The appearance and health of the gingiva significantly contribute to an aesthetically pleasing smile. Pink gingiva indicates healthy gums and is generally preferred over dark or mixed colors. However, gingival color varies among individuals based on factors such as race, geography, gum health, epithelial thickness, vascular supply, keratinization level, and pigments in the epithelium layers.

Four primary pigments define mucosa color: melanin, oxygenated hemoglobin (Hb), carotenoids, and reduced Hb. Melanin notably affects excessive gingival pigmentation. Gingival melanin hyperpigmentation, sometimes called racial pigmentation, is a genetic trait present in many ethnic groups due to excess melanin deposition in the epithelial layers. While not a medical concern, this hyperpigmentation can be unattractive, especially for those with a gummy smile. As a result, many seek treatments to reduce or eliminate this pigmentation.

Various methods for gingival depigmentation exist, including surgical scraping, scalpel technique, bur abrasion, free gingival graft, gingivectomy, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, chemical treatments, and lasers. A significant challenge with these treatments is gingival repigmentation or the reappearance of melanin post-procedure.

For years, the scalpel technique was the standard. It's a straightforward and economical method that involves removing the gingival epithelium and some underlying tissue. Although it promotes quick healing, the procedure can cause bleeding, necessitating local anesthesia and post-operative dressings. Due to the associated discomfort, researchers have sought equally effective alternatives.

Laser ablation has become a popular choice among dental professionals and patients. Lasers like carbon dioxide (CO2), diode, argon, ruby, Nd:YAG (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet) , and Er:YAG (erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet) have been proven effective through numerous studies. Lasers present benefits such as minimal post-operative pain, ease of use, and quicker treatment times. Recurrence rates post-laser surgery (1.16%) are lower than with the scalpel technique (4.25%). However, lasers also have downsides, including high costs, potential for thermal damage, and the risk of deep penetration.

One laser, the Erbium-chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG), has been FDA-approved for certain dental procedures but hasn't been widely used for gingival depigmentation. Preliminary findings suggest it offers advantages like reduced pain and faster healing compared to other lasers. In a case study involving two patients, the Er,Cr:YSGG laser effectively removed gingival pigmentation, with no recurrence observed after six months.

This clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy and recurrence rates between the conventional scalpel technique and the Er,Cr:YSGG laser technique. The hypothesis suggests that the Er,Cr:YSGG laser might be a superior treatment for gingival hyperpigmentation compared to other methods.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over 18 years of age
  • Periodontally healthy subjects with concerns about their esthetics and presence of gingival hyperpigmentation in the upper arch

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) smokers or were previous smokers
  • (2) had a systemic disease/condition,
  • (3) were pregnant/lactating
  • (4) had gingivitis, periodontitis or any other periodontal disease
  • (5) acquired amalgam pigmentation were excluded from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Surgical Stripping
Gingival depigmentation is the most widely used periodontal procedure to remove or reduce the melanotic areas. Various techniques can be employed to effectively carry out the depigmentation procedure, including surgical scraping, scalpel technique, bur abrasion, free gingival graft, gingivectomy, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, chemical therapies, and different types of lasers
Experimental: Erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) Laser Techniques
Gingival depigmentation is the most widely used periodontal procedure to remove or reduce the melanotic areas. Various techniques can be employed to effectively carry out the depigmentation procedure, including surgical scraping, scalpel technique, bur abrasion, free gingival graft, gingivectomy, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, chemical therapies, and different types of lasers

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oral pigmentation index (DOPI)
Time Frame: Pre surgical, 1 month post op, 12 months post op

This index of oral pigmentation is the commonly used index due to its simplicity and ease of use. The scores are as follows:

0 = No clinical pigmentation (pink-colored gingiva)

  1. Mild clinical pigmentation (mild light brown color)
  2. Moderate clinical pigmentation (medium brown or mixed pink and brown color)
  3. Heavy clinical pigmentation (deep brown or bluish black color)
Pre surgical, 1 month post op, 12 months post op
Gingival melanosis record (GMR)
Time Frame: Pre surgical, 1 month post op, 12 months post op
A quantitative analysis method using clinical oral photographs
Pre surgical, 1 month post op, 12 months post op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 077-16

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pigmentation

Clinical Trials on Gingival depigmentation

Subscribe