Phase III Study Comparing GVHD Prophylaxis With ATG-thymoglobulin to ATLG-grafalon in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplasic Syndrome and Receiving an Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation With a 10/10 HLA Matched Unrelated Donor (OPTISAGE)

April 22, 2026 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Phase III Study Comparing GVHD Prophylaxis With ATG-thymoglobulin to ATLG-grafalon in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplasic Syndrome and Receiving an Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation With a 10/10 HLA Matched Unrelated Donor Following a Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen by Fludarabine-treosulfan

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Most of the patients requiring an allo-HSCT are above 50 years of age and are transplanted with a reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen. The optimal RIC and Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen allowing a good control of the disease while preventing GVHD remains to be determined for elderly patients. A phase III trial comparing the conventional RIC fludarabine-busulfan 2 days to fludarabine-treosulfan demonstrated an advantage for the flu-treosulfan arm in terms of event free survival (EFS), that should therefore be considered as the new standard of RIC regimen for AML and MDS. GVHD prevention has a crucial role in post-transplant outcomes by potentially interfering with the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect and immune reconstitution. Anti-thymocyte globulins (ATG) are recommended to reduce the risk of acute and chronic GVHD in transplants performed with matched unrelated donors. However, the optimal type of ATG between the 2 approved brands (ATG-thymoglobulin and ATLG-grafalon) displaying distinct characteristics and the optimal dose of ATG are still unknown. In a retrospective study of patients transplanted mainly with RIC with matched related and unrelated donors for haematological malignancies, Anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) was associated with a reduction of grade II-IV acute GVHD in comparison to ATG without increasing the incidence of relapse.

This phase III randomised study propose to compare GVHD prevention with ATG versus ATLG in AML and MDS patients above 50 years of age transplanted with a matched unrelated donor following a fludarabine-treosulfan RIC, with the hypothesis that ATLG would better control GVHD in this population of patients thus limiting the risk of morbidity and mortality of the procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

324

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France
      • Angers, France
      • Besançon, France
      • Bordeaux, France
      • Brest, France
      • Caen, France
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France
      • Créteil, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Henri Mondor AP-HP
        • Contact:
      • Grenoble, France
      • Lille, France
      • Limoges, France
      • Lyon, France
      • Marseille, France
      • Montpellier, France
      • Nancy, France
        • Recruiting
        • Chru Nancy
        • Contact:
      • Nantes, France
      • Nice, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Nice
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Necker AP-HP
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France
      • Paris, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital La Pitié Salpêtrière AP-HP
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Saint-Antoine AP-HP
        • Contact:
      • Poitiers, France
      • Rennes, France
      • Saint-Etienne, France
      • Strasbourg, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHRU Strasbourg
        • Contact:
      • Toulouse, France
      • Tours, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHRU Tours
        • Contact:
      • Villejuif, France

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 50 and ≤ 70 years
  2. Patient between 50 and 55 years should be unfit for a myeloblative conditioning (SORROR score ≥2)
  3. AML requiring allogeneic stem cell transplantation (intermediate or high-risk AML) in complete cytologic response (CR1 or above) or MDS requiring allogeneic stem cell transplantation (IPSS≥ 1.5 or IPSS-R > 4.5 or IPSS-R > 3-4.5 with risk features [rapide blast increase, life-threatening neutropenia (<0.3 G/L) or thrombopenia (<30G/L) or high transfusion needs (>2/month for 6 months)]
  4. Without an HLA matched related donor
  5. Having an identified matched HLA 10/10 unrelated donor
  6. With usual criteria for HSCT:

    1. ECOG performans status ≤ 2
    2. No severe and uncontrolled infection
    3. Cardiac left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%
    4. Lung DLCO > 40%
    5. Adequate organ function: ASAT and ALAT ≤ 3N, total bilirubin ≤ 2N, creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min (except if those abnormalities are linked to the hematological disease)
  7. With health insurance coverage
  8. Having signed a written informed consent
  9. Contraception methods must be prescribed during all the duration of the research

NB: The authorized contraceptive methods are:

  • For women of childbearing age and in absence of permanent sterilization: oral, intravaginal or transdermal combined hormonal contraception, oral, injectable or transdermal progestogen-only hormonal contraception, intrauterine hormonal releasing system (IUS), sexual abstinence (only if this the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participants).
  • For man in absence of permanent sterilization: sexual abstinence, condoms

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cancer in the last 5 years (except basal cell carcinoma of the skin or "in situ" carcinoma of the cervix)
  2. Uncontrolled infection
  3. Seropositivity for HIV or HTLV-1 or active hepatitis B or C
  4. Yellow fever vaccine and all others live virus vaccines within 2 months before transplantation
  5. Heart failure according to NYHA (II or more) or Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%.
  6. Lung DLCO ≤ 40%
  7. Preexisting acute hemorrhagic cystitis
  8. Renal failure with creatinine clearance < 50ml / min
  9. Pregnancy (β-HCG positive) or breast-feeding
  10. Patients with any debilitating medical or psychiatric illness, which would preclude the realization of the SCT or the understanding of the protocol
  11. Patient under state medical aid
  12. Patient under legal protection (protection of the court, or in curatorship or guardianship).
  13. For Grafalon: Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients
  14. For Thymoglobulin: Hypersensitivity to rabbit proteins or to any of the excipients
  15. Participation in other interventional clinical trials
  16. Any contraindication mentioned in the SmPC of all auxiliary medicinal products planned to be used in the trial: cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, fludarabine, treosulfan

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG)
10 mg/Kg/day IV for 3 consecutive days (day-3 to -1 before transplantation)
Active Comparator: Anti Thymocyte Globulins (ATG)
2.5 mg/Kg/day IV for 2 consecutive days (day-3 and -2 before transplantation)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of grade II-IV acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) according to the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) classification
Time Frame: At day 100 post-transplantation

Acute GVHD MAGIC classification permit to diagnose and score the severity of acute GVHD.

MAGIC score varies from Grade 0 to Grade 4. The higher the score the more severe the damage.

At day 100 post-transplantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with at least 3 consecutive days with neutrophils > 0.5 G/L and platelets > 20 G/L
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Hematopoietic recoveries
Up to 24 months
T, B, NK, regulatory T cell and gammaglobulin levels in the peripheral blood
Time Frame: 1 month after transplantation
Immune reconstitution
1 month after transplantation
T, B, NK, regulatory T cell and gammaglobulin levels in the peripheral blood
Time Frame: 100 days after transplantation
Immune reconstitution
100 days after transplantation
T, B, NK, regulatory T cell and gammaglobulin levels in the peripheral blood
Time Frame: 6 months after transplantation
Immune reconstitution
6 months after transplantation
T, B, NK, regulatory T cell and gammaglobulin levels in the peripheral blood
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
Immune reconstitution
12 months after transplantation
T, B, NK, regulatory T cell and gammaglobulin levels in the peripheral blood
Time Frame: 24 months after transplantation
Immune reconstitution
24 months after transplantation
Percentage of chimerism
Time Frame: 1 month after transplantation
1 month after transplantation
Percentage of chimerism
Time Frame: 100 days after transplantation
100 days after transplantation
Percentage of chimerism
Time Frame: 6 months after transplantation
6 months after transplantation
Percentage of chimerism
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
12 months after transplantation
Incidence of grade I acute GVHD
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Treatments for acute GVHD will be described : first line treatment, response to steroids, treatment courses for refractory acute GVHD
Up to 24 months
Incidence of chronic GVHD
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
Incidence of chronic GVHD according to National Institutes of Health (NIH) classification. The gradation of chronic GvHD is defined by the number and score of affected organ. The higher the score of each organ and the higher the number of organs affected, the more severe the damage.
12 months after transplantation
Incidence of chronic GVHD
Time Frame: 24 months after transplantation
Incidence of chronic GVHD according to National Institutes of Health (NIH) classification. The gradation of chronic GvHD is defined by the number and score of affected organ. The higher the score of each organ and the higher the number of organs affected, the more severe the damage.
24 months after transplantation
Incidence of relapse
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
Relapse will be defined by the reappearance of leukemic cells or MDS features after allo-HSCT in the bonne marrow (cytology +/- cytogenetic analysis from bone marrow aspiration) or extra-medullary sites (proven by a biopsy).
12 months after transplantation
Incidence of relapse
Time Frame: 24 months after transplantation
Relapse will be defined by the reappearance of leukemic cells or MDS features after allo-HSCT in the bonne marrow (cytology +/- cytogenetic analysis from bone marrow aspiration) or extra-medullary sites (proven by a biopsy).
24 months after transplantation
Progression free survival
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
12 months after transplantation
Progression free survival
Time Frame: 24 months after transplantation
24 months after transplantation
Number of severe infections
Time Frame: 100 days after transplantation
Severe infections correspond to grade 3-4 according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
100 days after transplantation
Number of severe infections
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
Severe infections correspond to grade 3-4 according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
12 months after transplantation
Incidence of CytoMegaloVirus (CMV) reactivation
Time Frame: 100 days after transplantation
100 days after transplantation
Incidence of CytoMegaloVirus (CMV) reactivation
Time Frame: 6 months after transplantation
6 months after transplantation
Incidence of CytoMegaloVirus (CMV) reactivation
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
12 months after transplantation
Incidence of Ebstein Barr Virus (EBV) reactivation
Time Frame: 100 days after transplantation
100 days after transplantation
Incidence of Ebstein Barr Virus (EBV) reactivation
Time Frame: 6 months after transplantation
6 months after transplantation
Incidence of Ebstein Barr Virus (EBV) reactivation
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
12 months after transplantation
Non-relapse mortality
Time Frame: 6 months after transplantation
6 months after transplantation
Non-relapse mortality
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
12 months after transplantation
Non-relapse mortality
Time Frame: 24 months after transplantation
24 months after transplantation
Overall survival
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
12 months after transplantation
Overall survival
Time Frame: 24 months after transplantation
24 months after transplantation
GVHD and relapse free survival (GRFS)
Time Frame: Up to 24 months after transplantation
Defined by being alive without disease relapse and without having developed acute grade III-IV or severe chronic GVHD
Up to 24 months after transplantation
Health-related Quality of life
Time Frame: At inclusion
Assessed by using the FACT-BMT-v4 questionnaire. It is a 50 items score. The score varies between 0 to 200. The higher the score the lower the quality of life.
At inclusion
Health-related Quality of life
Time Frame: 100 days after transplantation
Assessed by using the FACT-BMT-v4 questionnaire. It is a 50 items score. The score varies between 0 to 200. The higher the score the lower the quality of life.
100 days after transplantation
Health-related Quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months after transplantation
Assessed by using the FACT-BMT-v4 questionnaire. It is a 50 items score. The score varies between 0 to 200. The higher the score the lower the quality of life.
6 months after transplantation
Health-related Quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
Assessed by using the FACT-BMT-v4 questionnaire. It is a 50 items score. The score varies between 0 to 200. The higher the score the lower the quality of life.
12 months after transplantation
Number of days of hospitalization for the transplant and after the hospitalization for transplantation related complications
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after transplantation
Up to 12 months after transplantation
Incidence and severity of veino-occlusive disease (VOD)
Time Frame: 100 days after transplantation
100 days after transplantation
Lymphocyte counts on standard blood counts before conditioning
Time Frame: 7 days before transplantation
7 days before transplantation
Number of late acute GvHD, overlap syndromes and chronic GvHD
Time Frame: from day 100 to day 120 after transplantation
from day 100 to day 120 after transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 28, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 28, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 28, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on GVHD

Clinical Trials on Grafalon

Subscribe