Persuasive Health Communication Intervention for HIV/HCV

April 2, 2026 updated by: Roland Merchant, University of South Florida

Evaluation of a Persuasive Health Communication Intervention Designed to Increase HIV/HCV Screening Among Emergency Departments Patients Who Currently, Formerly or Never Injected Drugs.

A major impediment to emergency department (ED)-based HIV/HCV screening success is that often ED patients at risk for, or later diagnosed with, HIV and HCV decline testing. In this R01 project, the research team will assess how well a promising, easy-to-use, one-time, minimal-training-needed, very brief persuasive health communication intervention (PHCI) increases acceptance of testing among adult ED patients who either currently, formerly or never injected drugs and initially declined HIV/HCV screening. The research team will conduct a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) at EDs within the Mount Sinai Health System to compare the efficacy of the PHCI when delivered by a video vs. an HIV/HCV counselor. Patients who initially declined HIV/HCV screening will be stratified by injection-drug use (IDU) history cohorts: (1) current/former PWIDs, (2) never/non-PWIDs. Within each IDU history cohort, the research team will randomly assign participants (1:1:1) to a PHCI delivered by: (1) a video with captions, (2) a video without captions, (3) an HIV/HCV counselor. This R01 project will be conducted at Mount Sinai affiliate hospitals EDs. For Aim 2, the research team will determine if screening acceptance is similar across IDU history cohorts. For Aim 3, the research team will further compare the two delivery forms of the PHCI through a health economics assessment, both independent of IDU history and within each IDU history cohort.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

As part of routine practice at Mount Sinai Health System EDs, the ED Nurses initiate HIV/HCV screening for all patients able to provide consent. ED patients eligible for recruitment into the RCT portion of the study are those who declined HIV/HCV screening. RCs will review the electronic health records (EHRs) of patients present in the ED during data collection periods and determine which patients are potentially eligible.

Participation in the RCT involves a one-time encounter. All research-related activities will occur in the ED. As such, drop-out during this brief RCT (<30 minutes from recruitment through final study questionnaires) is expected to be minimal (<5%). RCs will coordinate with participants and ED staff to facilitate participant involvement while they are receiving medical care. If necessary, participants can continue participating in designated areas of the ED (e.g., waiting room, family room) after they are discharged and there are study-related tasks remaining. There are no research related follow-ups needed.

The research team will enroll a total of 2,000 adult ED patients who meet all study criteria and agree to participate in the RCT, stratified by IDU history. Assuming 0.6 participants completing the study/hour (1 study completion/75 minutes of recruitment, enrollment, and data collection), the research team could recruit up to ≈5,184 participants (720 collection days x 12 hours/data collection/day x 0.6 participants/hour) over 3 years.

The research team will be collecting data using the QDS™ (NOVA Research Company) program installed on a tablet computer. The program has the ability to encrypt collected data, to which only the researcher has ability to de-crypt data sets (NOVA Research cannot recover lost passwords for the researcher). The program also has a data management system, allowing data export for use in analytical packages like SPSS, Stata. Internet access is not necessary for this program to function. The data can be stored on the tablet computer for the meantime, then synced once internet is available.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

2000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 years-old
  • Speak English or Spanish, and able to provide informed consent for study participation
  • Not HIV AND HCV infected/Antibody+ (per EHR review and patient report)
  • Not already participating in a HIV or HCV study (e.g., HIV PrEP, HIV vaccine)
  • Not tested for HIV OR HCV within the past 12 months (per EHR review and patient report)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • <18 years old
  • Unable to speak Spanish or English
  • HIV or HCV positive
  • Currently enrolled in another HIV or HCV research study
  • Has tested for HIV or HCV in the past 12 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Persuasive Health Communication Intervention delivered by Health Educator
Healthcare provider educator getting patients screened for HIV/HCV.
The video created by the research will be compared to a healthcare provider in terms of effectiveness in getting patients screened for HIV/HCV.
Active Comparator: Persuasive Health Communication Intervention delivered in video format with captions
A video with captions created by the research team will be played to persuade patients to participate in HIV and Hepatitis C (HCV) screening.
A video with captions created by the research team will be played to persuade patients to participate in HIV and Hepatitis C (HCV) screening.
Active Comparator: Persuasive Health Communication Intervention delivered in video format without captions
A video with captions created by the research team will be played to persuade patients to participate in HIV and Hepatitis C (HCV) screening.
A video without captions created by the research team will be played to persuade patients to participate in HIV and Hepatitis C (HCV) screening.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients who accept HIV/HCV testing after speaking with a health educator
Time Frame: Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention
The number of patients who accept HIV/HCV testing after speaking with a health educator.
Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention
Number of patients who accept HIV/HCV testing after watching the video with captions
Time Frame: Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention
The number of patients who accept HIV/HCV testing after watching the video with captions
Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention
Number of patients who accept HIV/HCV testing after watching the video without captions
Time Frame: Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention
The number of patients who accept HIV/HCV testing after watching the video captions
Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of patients that accept HIV/HCV testing by no prior injection-drug use
Time Frame: Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention
The number of patients that accept HIV/HCV testing by no prior injection-drug use
Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention
The number of patients that accept HIV/HCV testing by former injection-drug use
Time Frame: Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention
The number of patients that accept HIV/HCV testing by former injection-drug use
Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention
The number of patients that accept HIV/HCV testing by current injection-drug use
Time Frame: Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention
The number of patients that accept HIV/HCV testing by current injection-drug use
Day 1, up to 5 minutes after intervention
Health economics assessment of PHCI
Time Frame: End of study, at 5 years
The research team will further compare the two delivery forms of the PHCI through a health economics assessment, both independent of IDU history and within each IDU history cohort. This will measure cost-benefit analysis in terms of cost of each intervention in relation to how effective it is on persuading real world populations to test for HIV and HCV.
End of study, at 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roland C Merchant, MD, University of South Florida

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Specify Other Time FrameAfter last patient enrolled up to a year from that time point.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee ('learned intermediary') identified for this purpose.

To achieve aims in the approved proposal. Specify Other Mechanism Secured excel file sent through email.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)

Clinical Trials on Health Educator

Subscribe