- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06094465
Learning Curve of Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy
October 19, 2023 updated by: Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Learning Curve of Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Surgeons With Extensive Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy Experience
A few reports were focused on the RPD learning curve for surgeons with extensive experience in LPD.
Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the number of cases required for such surgeons to overcome the learning curve for RPD and to analyze the impact of different phases of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
With the development of robotic surgery systems, their unique advantages over traditional laparoscopic surgery systems, such as a three-dimensional 10-fold magnified view, seven degrees of freedom for flexible wrist movements, tremor filtering, and good ergonomic design, have significantly improved the precision and quality of surgery.
The literature has reported that, compared with the laparoscopic surgery system, the robotic surgery system can reduce intraoperative blood loss and the conversion rate to laparotomy, in addition to the dissection of more lymph nodes.
Therefore, robotic surgery has become increasingly popular.
As the economy develops and surgeons gain more experience in LPD, many are shifting their focus to robotic pancreatoduodenectomy after mastering laparoscopic techniques.
There are a few reports on the RPD learning curve for surgeons with extensive experience in LPD.
Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the number of cases required for such surgeons to overcome the learning curve for RPD and to analyze the impact of different phases of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
100
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
From April 2020 to October 2022, consecutive patients with RPD performed for benign or malignant lesions at Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
patients who received robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy
Exclusion Criteria:
patients who did not receive robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
learning phase
According to the CUSUM curve, the phase before the peak of the curve is defined as the learning phase.
|
Different phases of the learning curve of RPD (learning phase or proficiency phase)
|
|
proficiency phase
According to the CUSUM curve, the phase after the peak of the curve is defined as the learning phase.
|
Different phases of the learning curve of RPD (learning phase or proficiency phase)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intraoperative operation time
Time Frame: the data was recorded and collected at the end of the surgery
|
Intraoperative operation time, defined as the duration from the skin incision to abdominal closure
|
the data was recorded and collected at the end of the surgery
|
|
Intraoperative blood loss
Time Frame: the data was recorded and collected at the end of the surgery
|
Intraoperative blood loss
|
the data was recorded and collected at the end of the surgery
|
|
Conversion to laparotomy
Time Frame: The data was recorded and collected at the end of the surgery
|
Conversion to laparotomy
|
The data was recorded and collected at the end of the surgery
|
|
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: up to 3 months after surgery
|
Postoperative pancreatic fistula; hemorrhage, abdominal infection, reoperation
|
up to 3 months after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Chair: Menghua Dai, MD, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Strobel O, Neoptolemos J, Jager D, Buchler MW. Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan;16(1):11-26. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0112-1.
- Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 1994 May;8(5):408-10. doi: 10.1007/BF00642443.
- Zhang H, Wu X, Zhu F, Shen M, Tian R, Shi C, Wang X, Xiao G, Guo X, Wang M, Qin R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus open approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5173-5184. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4864-3. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
- Nickel F, Haney CM, Kowalewski KF, Probst P, Limen EF, Kalkum E, Diener MK, Strobel O, Muller-Stich BP, Hackert T. Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):54-66. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003309.
- Wang M, Li D, Chen R, Huang X, Li J, Liu Y, Liu J, Cheng W, Chen X, Zhao W, Li J, Tan Z, Huang H, Li D, Zhu F, Qin T, Ma J, Yu G, Zhou B, Zheng S, Tang Y, Han W, Meng L, Ke J, Feng F, Chen B, Yin X, Chen W, Ma H, Xu J, Liu Y, Lin R, Dong Y, Yu Y, Liu J, Zhang H, Qin R; Minimally Invasive Treatment Group in the Pancreatic Disease Branch of China's International Exchange and Promotion Association for Medicine and Healthcare (MITG-P-CPAM). Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun;6(6):438-447. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00054-6. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
- Poves I, Burdio F, Morato O, Iglesias M, Radosevic A, Ilzarbe L, Visa L, Grande L. Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Approach for Pancreatoduodenectomy: The PADULAP Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018 Nov;268(5):731-739. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002893.
- Zhang H, Lan X, Peng B, Li B. Is total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy superior to open procedure? A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Oct 7;25(37):5711-5731. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i37.5711.
- Kamarajah SK, Gujjuri R, Bundred JR, Hilal MA, White SA. Long-term survival after minimally invasive resection versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. HPB (Oxford). 2021 Feb;23(2):197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
- Kawka M, Gall TMH, Hand F, Nazarian S, Cunningham D, Nicol D, Jiao LR. The influence of procedural volume on short-term outcomes for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy-a cohort study and a learning curve analysis. Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4719-4727. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09941-8. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
- Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, Steve J, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH. Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg. 2015 May;150(5):416-22. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.17.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 31, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
October 31, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 19, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
October 23, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 23, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 19, 2023
Last Verified
October 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- RPD
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pancreaticoduodenectomy
-
Thomas Jefferson UniversityUnknownPancreaticoduodenectomyUnited States
-
Xinrui Zhu,MDNot yet recruitingLaparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalPeking University First Hospital; Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy... and other collaboratorsCompletedDrainage | PancreaticoduodenectomyChina
-
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, IndiaNot yet recruiting
-
Chen XiaopingUnknownPancreaticoduodenectomyChina
-
Asan Medical CenterCompletedPancreaticoduodenectomyKorea, Republic of
-
Mayo ClinicTerminatedPancreaticoduodenectomyUnited States
-
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns...CompletedPancreaticoduodenectomyUnited States
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedPancreaticoduodenectomy
Clinical Trials on Different phase of the learning curve of RPD
-
Instituto Portugues Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco...Recruiting
-
St. Antonius HospitalActive, not recruitingBreast CancerNetherlands, Italy
-
Konya City HospitalCompletedPain, Postoperative | Pain, BackTurkey
-
University Hospital, GrenobleRecruiting
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical UniversityShihezi UniversityUnknownUnstable Angina | NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MIChina
-
University of FoggiaActive, not recruiting
-
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy...UnknownHemorrhage | Fistula | Gastrointestinal Dysfunction | Infection
-
Bilecik Seyh Edebali UniversitesiCompleted
-
University of ExeterPvolveCompletedMuscle Protein Synthesis | Menstrual Cycle PhaseUnited Kingdom
-
University Hospital, AngersCentre National des Etudes Spatiales - French Space Agency (CNES); Astronautic...Completed