Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Diclofenac Sodium Versus Vitamin D on Myofascial Pain

October 31, 2023 updated by: Serap Keskin Tunc, Yuzuncu Yıl University

Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Diclofenac Sodium Versus Vitamin D Supplements on Symptoms in Individuals With Myofascial Pain and Vitamin D Deficiency

It has been reported in the literature that there is a significant relationship between bruxism and low serum vitamin D levels. It was aimed to compare the effectiveness of diclofenac sodium treatment versus vitamin D supplementation on symptoms in individuals with myofascial pain and vitamin D deficiency.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the current literature, it has been reported that there is a significant relationship between teeth grinding and low serum vitamin D levels. Vitamin D has been shown to play an important role in the musculoskeletal and cardiovascular systems, as well as in the control of calcium and phosphate metabolism and in maintaining adequate blood levels of these minerals. Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with poor physical performance and low muscle strength. There are also studies to understand the relationship between TMJ disorders and vitamin D level (serum 25(OH) D). These studies reported a relationship between the presence of TMJ disorder and vitamin D deficiency.

NSAIDs are a large group of drugs that inhibit cyclooxygenases and thus prevent the formation of prostaglandins. Traditionally, it has been the most commonly prescribed group of medications for pain in the orofacial area. It is recommended to use these drugs regularly for at least 2 weeks to achieve an anti-inflammatory effect in individuals with TMJ disorders.

It was aimed to compare the effectiveness of diclofenac sodium treatment versus vitamin D supplementation on symptoms in individuals with myofascial pain and vitamin D deficiency.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Van, Turkey, 65000
        • Van Yuzuncu Yıl University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Vitamin D deficiency,
  • Myofascial pain complaint,
  • Chronic pain,
  • No missing teeth,
  • Absence of open bite and/or crossbite.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who have undergone interventional or surgical procedures related to the temporomandibular joint,
  • Temporomandibular joint pathology,
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding,
  • Individuals who do not come for postoperative checks,
  • Using different medications other than those recommended,
  • Allergy to study drugs and materials to be used

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Vitamin D + Occlusal Splint
Vitamin D is a fat-soluble secosteroid. Vitamin D is very important in muscle and bone metabolism. Vitamin D is a vitamin with some anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating properties.
Study group using Vitamin D for myofascial pain treatment. "Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders" was used in the diagnosis of patients with myofascial pain. Study group usind Vitamin D for myofascial pain treatment. Medical treatment with Vitamin D (10,000 IU/day) + Occlusal Splint treatment was applied. Occlusal Splints were made of hard acrylic with a flat surface and were used only for 8 hours during sleep for 3 months. 500 mg Paracetamol tablet was prescribed to the patients as a rescue painkiller if they needed painkillers.
Other Names:
  • devit-3
Active Comparator: Diclofenac Sodium + Occlusal Splint
Diclofenac Sodium is a type of NSAID which has been found effective both as an analgesic and in reducing inflammation and is classified as weak and preferentially COX-2 selective.
"Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders" was used in the diagnosis of patients with myofascial pain. Control group using Diclofenac Sodium for myofascial pain treatment. Medical treatment with Diclofenac Sodium (Voltaren 75 mg, 2x1 ) + Occlusal Splint treatment was applied. Occlusal Splints were made of hard acrylic with a flat surface and were used only for 8 hours during sleep for 3 months. 500 mg Paracetamol tablet was prescribed to the patients as a rescue painkiller if they needed painkillers.
Other Names:
  • Voltaren

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS pain score
Time Frame: At baseline
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is one of the pain rating scales between 1-10.
At baseline
VAS pain score
Time Frame: 1 week
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is one of the pain rating scales between 1-10.
1 week
VAS pain score
Time Frame: 1 mounth
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is one of the pain rating scales between 1-10.
1 mounth
VAS pain score
Time Frame: 3 mounth
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is one of the pain rating scales between 1-10.
3 mounth
Painless Unassisted Mouth Opening
Time Frame: At baseline
Pain-free opening e.g. maximum comfortable opening was defined as the maximum distance the subject could open his/her mouth without experiencing any pain and discomfort. After the subject had opened this wide, the examiner measured the distance between the maxillary and mandibular incisal edges.
At baseline
Painless Unassisted Mouth Opening
Time Frame: 1 week
Pain-free opening e.g. maximum comfortable opening was defined as the maximum distance the subject could open his/her mouth without experiencing any pain and discomfort. After the subject had opened this wide, the examiner measured the distance between the maxillary and mandibular incisal edges.
1 week
Painless Unassisted Mouth Opening
Time Frame: 1 mounth
Pain-free opening e.g. maximum comfortable opening was defined as the maximum distance the subject could open his/her mouth without experiencing any pain and discomfort. After the subject had opened this wide, the examiner measured the distance between the maxillary and mandibular incisal edges.
1 mounth
Painless Unassisted Mouth Opening
Time Frame: 3 mounth
Pain-free opening e.g. maximum comfortable opening was defined as the maximum distance the subject could open his/her mouth without experiencing any pain and discomfort. After the subject had opened this wide, the examiner measured the distance between the maxillary and mandibular incisal edges.
3 mounth
Maximum Unassisted Mouth Opening
Time Frame: At baseline
Maximum assisted opening was defined as the maximum distance the subject could open the mouth, even if he/she felt pain or discomfort. The interincisal distance between the maxillary and mandibular incisal edges was measured.
At baseline
Maximum Unassisted Mouth Opening
Time Frame: 1 week
Maximum assisted opening was defined as the maximum distance the subject could open the mouth, even if he/she felt pain or discomfort. The interincisal distance between the maxillary and mandibular incisal edges was measured.
1 week
Maximum Unassisted Mouth Opening
Time Frame: 1 mounth
Maximum assisted opening was defined as the maximum distance the subject could open the mouth, even if he/she felt pain or discomfort. The interincisal distance between the maxillary and mandibular incisal edges was measured.
1 mounth
Maximum Unassisted Mouth Opening
Time Frame: 3 mounth
Maximum assisted opening was defined as the maximum distance the subject could open the mouth, even if he/she felt pain or discomfort. The interincisal distance between the maxillary and mandibular incisal edges was measured.
3 mounth
Maximum Assisted Mouth Opening
Time Frame: At baseline
Maximum assisted opening was defined as the maximum distance the subject could open the mouth, even if he/she felt pain or discomfort. After the subject had opened this wide, the examiner placed his fingers on the subject's maxillary and mandibular central incisors, and forced the subject's mouth to open wider. The interincisal distance between the maxillary and mandibular incisal edges was measured.
At baseline
Maximum Assisted Mouth Opening
Time Frame: 1 week
Maximum assisted opening was defined as the maximum distance the subject could open the mouth, even if he/she felt pain or discomfort. After the subject had opened this wide, the examiner placed his fingers on the subject's maxillary and mandibular central incisors, and forced the subject's mouth to open wider. The interincisal distance between the maxillary and mandibular incisal edges was measured.
1 week
Maximum Assisted Mouth Opening
Time Frame: 1 mounth
Maximum assisted opening was defined as the maximum distance the subject could open the mouth, even if he/she felt pain or discomfort. After the subject had opened this wide, the examiner placed his fingers on the subject's maxillary and mandibular central incisors, and forced the subject's mouth to open wider. The interincisal distance between the maxillary and mandibular incisal edges was measured.
1 mounth
Maximum Assisted Mouth Opening
Time Frame: 3 mounth
Maximum assisted opening was defined as the maximum distance the subject could open the mouth, even if he/she felt pain or discomfort. After the subject had opened this wide, the examiner placed his fingers on the subject's maxillary and mandibular central incisors, and forced the subject's mouth to open wider. The interincisal distance between the maxillary and mandibular incisal edges was measured.
3 mounth

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myofascial Pain Dysfunction Syndrome,Temporomandibular Joint

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D

Subscribe