Trial Comparing Systemic Therapy Alone and With Local Ablative Treatment for Stage IV NSCL Cancer Patients (salVage)

March 27, 2026 updated by: Swiss Cancer Institute

Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Maintenance Systemic Therapy Alone With Systemic Therapy Plus Local Ablative Treatment for Patients With Advanced Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Unfortunately, most patients are already at a very advanced stage when they are diagnosed with lung cancer, i.e. the cancer has already spread outside the lungs forming metastases. The current standard of care therapy at this advanced stage of lung cancer includes systemic anti-cancer therapy such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy to boost the body's immune response, or targeted therapy that directly hinders tumor growth. In this study, the aim is to find out whether it is better if, after a good response to the standard therapy, the remains of main tumor and the metastases are additionally treated by surgery and/or radiation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study, the aim is to find out whether, after a good response to standard therapy, it is better if the main tumor and metastases are additionally removed by surgery and/or radiation. This intervention is referred to as local ablative therapy (LAT). There is evidence to suggest that this additional intervention may prolong the average time to possible cancer recurrence (PFS: Progression-free survival) or lead to longer survival on average. Therefore, the question is to know if these treatments prolong life, and if so, by how much and with what implications. Currently, patients who respond to initial standard therapy are not routinely offered LAT. If the results of this study are positive, it will lead to a fundamental change in the current standard of practice.

The benefit of a therapy is not solely determined by the extension of PFS or overall survival but also heavily influenced by how the therapy impacts patient's quality of life. Medication side effects, pain, fatigue, nausea or extended hospital stays can significantly diminish the perceived positive effects of a treatment from the patient's viewpoint, even if it appears favorable from a medical standpoint. Therefore, the assessment of quality of life through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is a central aspect of this study.

This study will enroll 128 patients from different Swiss hospitals, randomly assigning them to either the intervention group (LAT) or a control group (standard therapy). The study is expected to span approximately two years for each patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

128

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Aarau, Switzerland, 5001
        • Recruiting
        • Kantonspital Aarau
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Max Lacour, MD
      • Bellinzona, Switzerland, 6500
        • Recruiting
        • IOSI Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Patrizia Froesch, MD
        • Contact:
      • Chur, Switzerland, CH-7000
        • Recruiting
        • Kantonsspital Graubuenden
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael Thomas Mark, MD
      • Fribourg, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Fribourgeois - Hôpital Cantonal
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro, Prof
      • Geneva, Switzerland, 1205
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève HUG
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Benoît Bédat, MD
      • Lucerne, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Luzerner Kantonsspital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Fabrizio Minervini, MD
      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8091
        • Recruiting
        • Universitatsspital Zurich
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Isabelle Schmitt-Opitz, Prof

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria at screening may be enrolled in the trial.

  • The inclusion criteria are irrespective from the tumor burden at the time of primary diagnosis before initiation of first line systemic therapy. Treatment of brain metastases upfront or after an induction phase of standard systemic therapy is done according to the standard practice of the treating center.
  • Adults (18 years or older)
  • Tissue confirmed, pre-treatment clinical stage IV NSCLC
  • ECOG performance status ≤ 1
  • Patients responding after 3 cycles (4th bridging cycle up until randomization is allowed) or 3 months of first line SoC systemic therapy with PR or SD in restaging imaging, and presenting with (induced) oligometastatic or oligopersistent NSCLC defined as a maximum of 5 residual extracranial, distant metastases
  • Patients may have up to 5 cranial metastases in addition to the oligoresidual extracranial metastases as long as they are amenable for radiotherapy or surgery.
  • The primary tumor and all oligopersistent metastases must be amenable for radical LAT (surgery or radiotherapy)
  • Patients of reproductive age agree to use double contraception during the study
  • Patient is able to understand trial procedures and is able/willing to adhere to trial procedures as confirmed by signature

Exclusion Criteria:

The presence of any one of the following exclusion criteria at screening will lead to exclusion of the participant:

  • Serious concomitant disorder that would compromise patient safety during LAT
  • Unresolved complications from initial systemic anticancer treatment, higher than CTCAE grade 2
  • Metastatic locations such as malignant ascites, malignant pleural or malignant pericardial effusion, diffuse lymphangiosis of skin or lung, diffuse bone marrow metastasis, abdominal masses/abdominal organomegaly, identified by physical exam that is not measurable by reproducible imaging techniques, leptomeningeal carcinomatosis
  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
  • Patient is currently involved in a trial that either does not permit participation in other trials or would result in excessive patient burden if another trial were joined. In such cases, the co-investigators' team and the Patient Advisory Board will decide on participation on an individual basis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group: Local consolidative treatment (LAT) & Systemic Therapy

All patients undergo standard of care (SoC) first-line systemic therapy according to the results of the molecular analysis obtained from the diagnostic biopsy, as per standard of the respective center.

Patients will undergo additional complete surgical resection of the primary tumor with mediastinal lymph node sampling or radical radiotherapy (preferred stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to the primary tumor. Surgery and/or SBRT to the metastases will be performed before or after the treatment of the primary tumor according to the clinical need. Thereafter, the treatment will be followed by systemic anticancer treatment as SoC.

Radiotherapy
Surgery
The choice of LAT intervention for the primary tumor and all metastases (surgery or SBRT) and the sequence of the treatment (primary tumor vs metastases) will be decided at the local MDT according to the medical need and patient counseling during interdisciplinary clinic visits.
Other Names:
  • Systemic therapy
Active Comparator: Control group: Systemic Therapy
Patients of the control group will receive systemic anticancer treatment alone chemotherapy, chemo-immunotherapy, immunotherapy alone, or targeted treatment).
Radiotherapy
The choice of LAT intervention for the primary tumor and all metastases (surgery or SBRT) and the sequence of the treatment (primary tumor vs metastases) will be decided at the local MDT according to the medical need and patient counseling during interdisciplinary clinic visits.
Other Names:
  • Systemic therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) l in the Local Ablative Therapy (LAT) arm is superior to Standard of Care (SoC)
Time Frame: up to 24 months after randomization
Progression free survival (PFS) will be assessed by regular clinical examinations of the patients and based on imaging modalities such as (PET)-CT scans and brain MRIs.
up to 24 months after randomization
Quality of life (QoL) in the LAT arm is non-inferior to the control arm as measured with the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire-based score at 6 months after randomization
Time Frame: 6 months after randomization
To show that QoL in the LAT arm is non-inferior to the control arm, mobility the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire will be used. The questionnaire uses an 1 (no problem) to 5 (extreme problems) scale.
6 months after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients undergoing LAT maintain Quality of Life (QoL)
Time Frame: up to 24 months after randomization
Patients undergoing LAT maintain Quality of Life (QoL) as measured by using the EQ-5D-5L on different time points of the trial.
up to 24 months after randomization
To assess safety and tolerability of the LAT strategy as compared to standard of care
Time Frame: from randomization until 30 days after last intervention
Safety to study interventions will be evaluated by measuring counts of serious adverse events from randomization until 30 days after last intervention or progression, whichever occurs first. Serious adverse events will be evaluated based on CTCAE v5.0.from randomization up until 30 days after last intervention.
from randomization until 30 days after last intervention
To compare quality-adjusted life years
Time Frame: up to 24 months after randomization
Quality-adjusted life years will be calculated based on the EQ-5D-5L scores and compared between treatment groups, as accrued during the trial observation period across all time points
up to 24 months after randomization
To evaluate the economic impact of the LAT approach
Time Frame: from signing informed consent until 24 months after randomization
The economic impact of the LAT approach will be calculated based on the costs of the LAT intervention and on the costs of healthcare utilization outside of the hospital. For the calculation of healthcare utilization costs, patients will be asked on scheduled visits about the healthcare services they have been using outside of the hospital.
from signing informed consent until 24 months after randomization
To assess the response of primary tumor and metastases to systemic treatment alone and in combination with LAT (according to (i)RECIST criteria)
Time Frame: from intervention until 24 month after randomization
from intervention until 24 month after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Isabelle Schmitt-Opitz, Prof, Universitatsspital Zurich

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Clinical Trials on Radiotherapy

Subscribe