External Beam Radiotherapy Combined With Endorectal High-dose-rate Brachytherapy in Elderly and Frail Patients With Rectal Cancer (ACO/ARO/AIO-22)

April 27, 2026 updated by: Prof. Dr. med. Dr. Emmanouil Fokas, University Hospital of Cologne

ACO/ARO/AIO-22 - External Beam Radiotherapy Combined With Endorectal High-dose-ratebrachytherapy in Elderly and Frail Patients With Rectal Cancer. A Prospective Multicentre Trial of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group

ACO/ARO/AIO-22 - External beam radiotherapy combined with endorectal high-dose-ratebrachytherapy in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer.

A prospective multicentre trial of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Epidemiological data indicate that more than 50% of patients with newly-diagnosed rectal cancer are older than 70 years, with rising numbers expected over the next decades. Albeit total mesorectal excision (TME) is considered part of the standard multimodal therapy in rectal cancer, elderly and frail rectal cancer patients are often unable to undergo radical surgery as the risk of surgical complications and postoperative mortality rises with increasing age and comorbidity. In an analysis of the Colorectal Cooperative Group UK (1988-200) in 34.194 patients with colorectal cancer, 21% of those aged over 85 years did not undergo operation, while the rates of no surgical intervention were 11% in the 75-84 years age group. Furthermore, these patients often receive no treatment at all due to frailty and concurrent diseases, resulting in local and/or systemic disease progression with associated symptoms and impaired quality of life (QoL).

Significant advances have been made in modern radiotherapy (RT), which can provide a valuable alternative non-operative treatment strategy for elderly and frail patients. Notably, to achieve clinical complete response (cCR) with RT alone, high doses are needed. Recent data from randomized trials (OPERA, MORPEUS) in young and fit patients with rectal cancer indicate that increased RT doses can be safely delivered following external beam (chemo)radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by endoluminal radiotherapeutic modalities, such as contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) or high-dose rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-BT). However, prospective studies testing this therapeutic concept in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer remain limited. Also, despite the wide availability of brachytherapy, applicability of this concept remains largely unexplored in this challenging age subgroup in Germany.

The ACO/ARO/AIO-22 prospective trial will aim to evaluate the efficacy of EBRT in combination with endorectal HDR-BT to achieve local control (cCR) and maintain QoL in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer that are considered unfit for radical surgery, but amenable to EBRT in combination with endorectal HDR-BT or CXB.

The ACO/ARO/AIO-22 incorporates several aspects that make this prospective study important:

  1. treatment decision making is challenging in elderly/frail patients with rectal cancer, whereas standardized treatment guidelines for this patient cohort are lacking, thus necessitating new clinical trials to establish the best possible treatment in this clinical setting;
  2. the combination of EBRT and HDR-BT has been shown to result in high rates of tumor response with almost 90% overall response and cCR rates of approximately 50-80%, especially in young and fit patients with early stage tumors, whereas prospective trials in elderly/frail patients remain limited;
  3. due to its very steep dose gradient, endorectal HDR-BT enables the delivery of a very high radiation dose to the tumor with a very steep decrease in the volume of normal tissue, thus increasing treatment efficacy while keeping toxicity low;
  4. albeit already tested in different countries such as France, the Netherlands and the UK, the concept of combining EBRT with endorectal HDR-BT has not been widely tested in Germany yet and, thus, a prospective study is needed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in elderly/frail patients with rectal cancer, to develop expertise and to make this modality widely available for this challenging patient cohort.

Altogether, the concept of combining EBRT with endorectal HDR-BT to be tested as part of the ACO/ARO/AIO-22 prospective trial constitutes an attractive option in elderly/frail patients with rectal cancer unfit for radical surgery as it can potentially provide long-term local control of the primary tumor, prevent disease-related morbidity, prolong survival, improve QoL and even lead to cCR with complete cure in selected cases.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Emmanouil Fokas, MD DPhil
  • Phone Number: +49 22147884763

Study Locations

    • BaBaden-Württembergs
      • Kempten, BaBaden-Württembergs, Germany, 87439
        • Klinikverbund Allgäu
        • Contact:
          • Florian f Sterzing, Prof. Dr. med.
    • Hesse
      • Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany, 60590
    • North Rhine-Westphalia
      • Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 50937
        • Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Cyberknife und Radioonkologie Universität zu Köln
        • Contact:
    • Saxony
      • Leipzig, Saxony, Germany, 04103
        • Leipzig, Universitätsklinikum
        • Contact:
          • Thomas t Kuhnt, Prof. Dr.
          • Phone Number: +49 341 97-16650

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elderly patients (age ≥70 years) with a G8-frailty score ≤ 14 based on the G8 geriatric assessment tool of frailty and/or elderly patients (age ≥70 years) with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) ≥ 3 and/ elderly patients (age ≥70 years) unsuitable to tolerate radical surgery as judged by the surgeon and/or elderly patients (age ≥70 years) that refuse radical surgery
  • Life expectancy ≥ 6 months
  • Male and female patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma localized 0-16 cm from the anocutaneous line as measured by rigid rectoscopy
  • MRI-defined cT1-3d N0/+ M0, mrCRM - / +, </= 2/3 involvement of the rectal wall circumference
  • Staging requirements: High-resolution, thin-sliced (i.e. 3mm) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis is the mandatory local staging procedure.
  • Spiral-CT of the abdomen and chest to exclude distant metastases.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous or current drug abuse
  • Other concomitant antineoplastic therapy
  • Prior or concurrent malignancy ≤ 3 years prior to enrolment in study (Exception: non-melanoma skin cancer or cervical carcinoma FIGO stage 0-

    1), unless the patient is continuously disease-free

  • Psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule (these conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients with Rectal cancer
Patients will be initially treated with EBRT with 13 x 3 Gy to a total dose of 39 Gy to the primary tumor and pelvic lymph node, over a period of 2.5 weeks. Restaging with pelvic MRI and endoscopy will then be performed 6.5 weeks after completion of EBRT and prior to the first endorectal HDR-BT fraction to evaluate initial therapy response and the residual extent of the disease for target outlining. Following that, endorectal HDR-BT will be delivered with 3 x 8 Gy to a total dose of 24 Gy (dose prescription: 5 mm depth for cT1 tumors; 10 mm depth for cT2-3 tumors), with each endorectal brachytherapy application performed once weekly.
External beam radiotherapy and endorectal brachytherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Clinical Complete Response (cCR) or Near cCR at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 Months

The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving a clinical complete response (cCR) or near cCR at 12 months after the initiation of treatment, assessed through MRI and endoscopic evaluation.

Quality of Life (QoL) at 12 Months

Assessed using the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 questionnaire, tailored to evaluate the QoL in elderly cancer patients. The primary measure will be the change in the QoL score from baseline to 12 months.

12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes
Time Frame: 2 years

EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 for general and colorectal cancer-specific QoL. Wexner-Score for anorectal function assessment. Sustained cCR at 2 Years

Proportion of patients maintaining a cCR for two years post-treatment. Disease-Free Survival (DFS) at 2 Years

Time from treatment initiation to recurrence or death from any cause. Cumulative Incidence of Locoregional Regrowth

Frequency of locoregional tumor regrowth in patients who initially achieved cCR.

Cumulative Incidence of Distant Metastases Occurrence of distant metastases within the two-year follow-up period. Overall Survival (OS) at 2 Years Duration from treatment initiation to death from any cause. Acute and Late Toxicity Evaluation Categorized based on NCI CTCAE v.5.0, focusing on adverse events related to treatment.

G8 Geriatric Assessment Evaluation of frailty and health status using the G8 assessment tool, both at baseline and during follow-ups.

2 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Translational/Biomarker Studies
Time Frame: 6 months

Identification of molecular biomarkers predictive of treatment response or prognosis.

Follow-Up Procedures Standardized Watch and Wait (W&W) protocol for patients achieving cCR or near cCR at six months post-treatment.

6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Emmanouil Fokas, MD DPhil, University Hospital of Cologne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

ACO/ARO/AIO-22

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on radiotherapy

Subscribe