Intrathecal Morphine vs. Intrathecal Morphine and Regional Anesthesia After Cesarean Section.

May 20, 2024 updated by: Reine Zbeidy, University of Miami

Comparing Intrathecal Morphine and Erector Spinae Plane Regional Anesthesia Against Intrathecal Morphine Alone for Post-Cesarean Section Pain

The objective of the study is to optimize post-operative analgesia and improve patient satisfaction while reducing total opioid consumption after cesarean section

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Able to consent
  • BMI<35

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults unable to consent
  • BMI>35
  • Individuals <18 years of age at time of admission
  • Individuals taking anticoagulant medications
  • Significant co-morbid disease of pregnancy (including: gestational diabetes and significant abnormal placentation)
  • Pre-existing chronic pain or pain disorder diagnosis
  • Conversion from neuraxial to general anesthesia
  • Prisoners

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: erector spinae plane block
participants will be in this group for up to 9 months and receive erector spinae plane (ESP) block
nerve block for abdominal pain. administered once immediately prior to spinal anesthetic standard of care.
100 micrograms (mcg) of morphine administered in the spinal medications one time.
Ropivacaine 0.5% between 20-40 milliliters will be administered once in the ESP block (in the spine) depending on patient weight to keep under the maximum dose.
Bupivacaine 0.75% 1.4-1.7 milliliters (10-12 milligrams) spinal medication. administered one time.
Experimental: standard of care
participants in this group will receive the standard of care treatment and will be in this group for up to 9 months.
100 micrograms (mcg) of morphine administered in the spinal medications one time.
Ropivacaine 0.5% between 20-40 milliliters will be administered once in the ESP block (in the spine) depending on patient weight to keep under the maximum dose.
Bupivacaine 0.75% 1.4-1.7 milliliters (10-12 milligrams) spinal medication. administered one time.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
post-operative opioid analgesic medication
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
measurement (milligrams)
up to 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in post-operative pain medication by visual analog scale
Time Frame: baseline, up to 24 hours
Patient administered instrument to indicate pain on a level from 0 to10. (0: no pain. 10: worst imaginable pain)
baseline, up to 24 hours
number of minutes to first use of rescue medication
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
the number of minutes calculated using the kaplan-meier. Calculated using the number of patients that did not need the rescue analgesic at the start of each day post-surgery, and the number of patients who needed the rescue analgesic.
up to 24 hours
obstetric quality of recovery scale
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
responses range from 0-10. zero is strongly agree, strongly disagree.
up to 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Reine Zbeidy, MD, University of Miami

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 10, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-operative Pain

Clinical Trials on erector spinae plane block (ESP)

Subscribe