Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block and Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane(TLIP) Block for the Management of Postoperative Pain in Spinal Surgery

September 21, 2020 updated by: SINEM SARI, Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Lumbar vertebra surgery is one of the most common surgical procedures. After lumbar veretebra surgery, patients complain of excessive pain. Postoperative pain usually occurs in the early postoperative period and delays patient mobilization and thus lengthens hospital stay.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of erector spina plan(ESP) block and thoraco lumbar interfacial(TLIP) block on postoperative pain in patients with spinal surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Plan blocks are used as a good and safe option for multimodal analgesia techniques in postoperative pain control in spinal surgery.

The ESP block was first described in 2016 for the treatment of thoracic neuropathic pain.

In the following process; ESP block has been reported to provide effective postoperative analgesia in thoracic and breast surgery, bariatric surgery and upper abdominal surgery.

Finally, ESP block has been reported to provide effective postoperative analgesia in veretebra surgeries.

The mechanism of ESP analgesic action has been demonstrated in cadaver studies where injected local anesthetics are caused by diffusion of the spinal nerves into the ventral and dorsal ramycin by spreading in the cranial and caudal directions.

ESP block relieves incisional pain by creating an effective block in a wide area of the posterior, lateral and anterior thoracic and lumbar walls.

In addition, ESP block prevents visceral autonomic pain and provides good postoperative analgesia.

The thoracolumbar interfacial plan block (TLIP) is the other para-spinal plan block.

In this ultrasound guided block, local anesthetic targets the dorsal branches of the thoracolumbar nerves by spreading between the facies of the multifidus and longissimus muscles at the 3rd lumbar spine.

In this way, it has been reported to provide effective analgesia in spinal surgeries.

Routine ultrasonography guided ESP block or TLIP blog was planned randomly. Peroperative analgesia plan will be applied to all patients in the same way. In this protocol intravenous paracetamol was 1 g and tramadol was 1 mg / kg. Paracetamol and tramadol infusions are then administered every eight hours.

Postoperative analgesia protocol: At the end of the operation, pain levels will be recorded by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) system at 30 minutes, 1.6, 12, and 24 hours after the first admission to the recovery room.

Tramadol PCA and paracetamol were administered to the patient every eight hours.

During the follow-up of the patient, it is planned to continue NRS follow-up. In this period, intramuscular 75 mg diclofenac sodium will be administered if NRS is 4 or above.The amount of analgesia consumption, recovery analgesia needs and times will be noted in detail.

When the patient is mobilized and discharged will be recorded.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of erector spina plan(ESP) block and thoraco lumbar interfacial(TLIP) block on postoperative pain in patients with spinal surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Aydın, Turkey, 09100
        • Recruiting
        • Adnan Menderes University Medical Faculty, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • İsmet Topçu
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Varlik Erel
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Berkay Tan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 68 patients
  • ASA I-III,
  • Aged 18-75 years
  • underwent lumbar spine surgery under elective conditions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of contraindications to LA agents used in this study
  • Use of chronic opioids,
  • Psychiatric disorders.
  • The presence of infection at the injection area.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ESP Block
ESP Block: Bilateral ESP block and with ultrasound guidance will be applied A total 40 ml, 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5%, 20 ml saline.
Active Comparator: TLIP Block
TLIP Block: BilateralTLIP block and with ultrasound guidance will be applied A total 40 ml, 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5%, 20 ml saline.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NRS(numerical rating scala)
Time Frame: [Time Frame: 24 hours]
Each item is scored 0-10 ( 0=no pain, 10= pain as bad as can be) Postoperative pain intensity reported with NRS score : 30. minute, 1. hours, 6. hours, 12. hours, 24. hours
[Time Frame: 24 hours]
pruritus
Time Frame: [Time Frame: 24 hours]
each criterion is reported as present or absent each criterion is reported as present or absent
[Time Frame: 24 hours]
mobilized
Time Frame: [Time Frame: 7 days]
each criterion is reported as when the patient is mobilized
[Time Frame: 7 days]
nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: [Time Frame: 24 hours]
each criterion is reported as present or absent each criterion is reported as present or absent
[Time Frame: 24 hours]
use of antiemetics
Time Frame: [Time Frame: 24 hours]
each criterion is reported as present or absent each criterion is reported as present or absent
[Time Frame: 24 hours]
discharged
Time Frame: [Time Frame: 7 days]
each criterion is reported as when the patient is discharged
[Time Frame: 7 days]

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sinem Sarı, Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block

3
Subscribe