Managing Pain in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis - A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

October 31, 2023 updated by: Soheil Ashkani Esfahani, Massachusetts General Hospital
Plantar fasciitis (PF), a leading cause of persistent heel pain, results in almost a million physician visits annually. Conservative treatment is often the first line of management with insoles being frequently prescribed. While multiple studies have compared insoles based on the degree of customization to foot contour, the literature is lacking in data comparing insoles based on their material. In this randomized clinical trial, we compared the early effects of polyethylene (PE), polyurethane (PU), and carbon fiber insoles in the treatment of PF, using a set of patient-reported outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Carbon fiber insoles (VKTRY, Milford, CT, USA) were initially designed to increase ground forces leading to a harder push off for faster running or higher jumping. To enable energy return, the insoles require extreme rigidity and therefore are composed of a full-length carbon-fiber base. The highly rigid construct of the carbon fiber can potentially benefit patients with plantar fasciitis by using these insoles in their own shoes, which could lead to more effective pain management, increased compliance, and improved patient outcomes. While this insole is currently being widely used by athletes, the application of this insole for PF patients has not been explored. Therefore, the aim of this study is to understand how patients respond to the these insoles compared to current standard orthotics (Superfeet Green, Superfeet Worldwide LLC. WA, USA and Aetrex L20, Aetrex Inc, NJ, USA) in a blinded randomized controlled trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (over 18 years old) with plantar fasciitis
  • Adults who are competent and able to consent on their own behalf
  • Patients who are seen at MGH Boston, MGH Waltham and Newton Wellesley Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who received an injection in the last 6 months in their plantar fascia
  • Patients who will need to be treated surgically
  • Patients who are non-English speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Carbon fiber insole
assigned carbon fiber insole
Arch support orthotic
Active Comparator: Polyurethane
Assigned polyurethane insole
Arch support orthotic
Active Comparator: Polyethylene
assigned polyethylene insole
Arch support orthotic

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PROMIS-Pain interference
Time Frame: Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups
measures the extent to which pain hinders an individual's engagement with physical, mental, cognitive, emotional, recreational, and social activities
Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups
PROMIS-Pain intensity
Time Frame: Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups
assesses how much a person hurts. Patients are usually able to provide quantitative pain intensity estimates relatively quickly
Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups
a 42-item questionnaire with 5 subscales: pain (9 items), other symptoms (7 items), activities of daily living (ADL) (17 items), sports/recreation (5 items), and quality of life (4 items
Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups
Visual Analogue Scale for pain
Time Frame: Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is one of the pain rating scales
Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 6, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 6, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021P003250

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

All data acquired as specified by this protocol will be maintained and monitored by approved study staff. Approved study staff will be responsible for collecting the signed consent forms. All electronic data and subject information will be secured on non-networking password protected computers; all paperwork will be secured in locked filing cabinets. All electronic data and subject information will be secured in REDCap and will be secured on non-networking password protected computers to which only study staff will have access; all paper work will be secured in locked filing cabinets.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe