- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06116799
Managing Pain in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis - A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
October 31, 2023 updated by: Soheil Ashkani Esfahani, Massachusetts General Hospital
Plantar fasciitis (PF), a leading cause of persistent heel pain, results in almost a million physician visits annually.
Conservative treatment is often the first line of management with insoles being frequently prescribed.
While multiple studies have compared insoles based on the degree of customization to foot contour, the literature is lacking in data comparing insoles based on their material.
In this randomized clinical trial, we compared the early effects of polyethylene (PE), polyurethane (PU), and carbon fiber insoles in the treatment of PF, using a set of patient-reported outcomes.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Carbon fiber insoles (VKTRY, Milford, CT, USA) were initially designed to increase ground forces leading to a harder push off for faster running or higher jumping.
To enable energy return, the insoles require extreme rigidity and therefore are composed of a full-length carbon-fiber base.
The highly rigid construct of the carbon fiber can potentially benefit patients with plantar fasciitis by using these insoles in their own shoes, which could lead to more effective pain management, increased compliance, and improved patient outcomes.
While this insole is currently being widely used by athletes, the application of this insole for PF patients has not been explored.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to understand how patients respond to the these insoles compared to current standard orthotics (Superfeet Green, Superfeet Worldwide LLC.
WA, USA and Aetrex L20, Aetrex Inc, NJ, USA) in a blinded randomized controlled trial.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
45
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
- Massachusetts General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients (over 18 years old) with plantar fasciitis
- Adults who are competent and able to consent on their own behalf
- Patients who are seen at MGH Boston, MGH Waltham and Newton Wellesley Hospital
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who received an injection in the last 6 months in their plantar fascia
- Patients who will need to be treated surgically
- Patients who are non-English speaking
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Carbon fiber insole
assigned carbon fiber insole
|
Arch support orthotic
|
|
Active Comparator: Polyurethane
Assigned polyurethane insole
|
Arch support orthotic
|
|
Active Comparator: Polyethylene
assigned polyethylene insole
|
Arch support orthotic
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PROMIS-Pain interference
Time Frame: Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups
|
measures the extent to which pain hinders an individual's engagement with physical, mental, cognitive, emotional, recreational, and social activities
|
Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups
|
|
PROMIS-Pain intensity
Time Frame: Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups
|
assesses how much a person hurts.
Patients are usually able to provide quantitative pain intensity estimates relatively quickly
|
Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups
|
a 42-item questionnaire with 5 subscales: pain (9 items), other symptoms (7 items), activities of daily living (ADL) (17 items), sports/recreation (5 items), and quality of life (4 items
|
Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups
|
|
Visual Analogue Scale for pain
Time Frame: Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups
|
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is one of the pain rating scales
|
Baseline, 2nd-, 6th-, and 12th-week follow-ups
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Cohena-Jimenez M, Pabon-Carrasco M, Perez Belloso AJ. Comparison between customised foot orthoses and insole combined with the use of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in plantar fasciitis, medium-term follow-up results: A randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2021 May;35(5):740-749. doi: 10.1177/0269215520976619. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
- Enders, H., Vienneau, J., Tomaras, E. K., Koerger, H., Nigg, S., & Nigg, B. (2015). Soccer shoe bending stiffness significantly alters game-specific physiology in a 25-minute continuous field-based protocol. Footwear Science, 7(sup1), S91-S93. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2015.1038626
- Bartolo, E., Formosa, C., & Gatt, A. (2017). The Relationship between Plantar Fasciitis and Plantar Heel Pressure. European Journal of Podiatry / Revista Europea de Podología, 3(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.17979/ejpod.2017.3.1.1741
- Bhimani, R., Sornsakrin, P., Vrolyk, M. A., Lubberts, B., Guss, D., DiGiovanni, C. W., & Waryasz, G. R. (2022). Use of Flexible Carbon Fiber Insoles for Hallux Rigidus: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics, 7(4), 2473011421S00590. https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00590
- Gerrard JM, Bonanno DR, Whittaker GA, Landorf KB. Effect of different orthotic materials on plantar pressures: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Jun 11;13(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00401-3.
- Hawke F, Burns J, Radford JA, du Toit V. Custom-made foot orthoses for the treatment of foot pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD006801. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006801.pub2.
- Lee SY, McKeon P, Hertel J. Does the use of orthoses improve self-reported pain and function measures in patients with plantar fasciitis? A meta-analysis. Phys Ther Sport. 2009 Feb;10(1):12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 1, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 6, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
May 6, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 31, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
November 3, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 3, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 31, 2023
Last Verified
October 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021P003250
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
All data acquired as specified by this protocol will be maintained and monitored by approved study staff.
Approved study staff will be responsible for collecting the signed consent forms.
All electronic data and subject information will be secured on non-networking password protected computers; all paperwork will be secured in locked filing cabinets.
All electronic data and subject information will be secured in REDCap and will be secured on non-networking password protected computers to which only study staff will have access; all paper work will be secured in locked filing cabinets.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.