Impact of Incomplete Endometrial Ablation

June 10, 2025 updated by: Danique Roelen, Maxima Medical Center

The Impact of Incomplete Endometrial Ablation on the Success Rate of Novasure Endometrial Ablation

The aim of the proposed protocol is to study the impact of incomplete endometrial ablation on the PBAC score, reintervention, satisfaction, controlled bleeding and dysmenorrhea at 24 months after Novasure endometrial ablation, in women with heavy menstrual bleeding treated at Máxima Medical Centre Veldhoven, in The Netherlands.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The primary outcome is blood loss at 24 months after treatment, measured with the PBAC-score according to Higham. To calculate this score women were asked, in the MIRA and MIRA2 study, to record their menstrual blood loss for one month counting the number of super tampons or pads used each day. The total score was calculated using a score of 1 for each lightly saturated tampons. For pads the scores were respectively 1, 5 and 20. Secondary outcome measures were controlled bleeding, defined as a PBAC-score not exceeding 75 points, PBAC score of zero, re-intervention rate 24 months after treatment, satisfaction with treatment (measured with a 5-point Likert scale) and dysmenorrhea.

In addition, multiple variables were analyzed in predicting the occurrence of incomplete endometrial ablation, including age, BMI, cavum length, cavum width, ablation time, ablation power, nulliparity, sterilization in history, section caesarea in history, position of the uterus (AVF/RVF), presence of myomas, the presence of adenomyosis and surgery under local anesthesia, generally without sterilization or generally in combination with sterilization. Information was collected from EPD and the MIRA and MIRA2 databases.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

121

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Noord-Brabant
      • Veldhoven, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands, 5500MB
        • Máxima MC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This retrospective cohort study was carried out using the data of women who participated in the MIRA study and the MIRA2 study including RCT and prospective cohort database. These women have given informed consent for their data to be used for future research into treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding. To be eligible for study inclusion, women had to suffer from heavy menstrual bleeding, and have undergone Novasure endometrial ablation at Máxima MC between January 2012 and July 2023. Women were excluded from the database if the hysteroscopy images were not saved, or these images were of poor quality.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Endometrial ablation between 2012 and 2023 in Máxima Medical Centre
  • Women had to suffer from heavy menstrual bleeding

Exclusion Criteria:

- No saved hysteroscopy images or bad quality hysteroscopy images

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Complete Novasure endometrial ablation
After treatment with novasure, the hysteroscopy showed no remains of endometrium, , so a complete novasure endomentrial ablation
uterine hysteroscopy right after Novasure endometrial ablation
Incomplete Novasure endometrial ablation
After treatment with novasure, the hysteroscopy showed remains of endometrium, so an incomplete novasure endomentrial ablation
uterine hysteroscopy right after Novasure endometrial ablation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) score
Time Frame: 24 months
Blood loss of 1 month, measured by the number of needed tampons/pads and how heavily they are filled with blood. The higher the score, the more severe blood loss. From 150 points the amount is defined as heavy menstrual bleeding.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of reintervention
Time Frame: 24 months
Surgical and Medical reintervention
24 months
Dysmennorrhea
Time Frame: 24 months
Presence of dysmennorrhea. Categorized as absence, mild, moderate and severe.
24 months
Number of patients having controlled bleeding
Time Frame: 24 months
Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) score less than 75.
24 months
Satisfaction of the patient with the treatment
Time Frame: 24 months
Satisfaction measured with a 5-point Likert scale. 1=very unsatisfied, 2= unsatisfied, 3= neutraal, 4= satisfied, 5= very satisfied.
24 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of possible prognostic variables predicting the occurrence of incomplete endometrial ablation.
Time Frame: baseline
Age, BMI, cavum length, cavum width, ablation time, ablation power, nulliparity, sterilization in history, section caesarea in history, position of the uterus (AVF/RVF), presence of myomas, the presence of adenomyosis and surgery under local anesthesia, generally without sterilization or generally in combination with sterilization
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marlies M.Y. Bongers, PhD, MD, Maxima Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

Clinical Trials on hysteroscopy

Subscribe