- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06126328
Materna Prep Study Phase II (EASE)
EASE Study: A Randomized, Controlled Study to EvAluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Materna Prep Device to Pre-stretch the Vaginal Canal and Pelvic Floor Muscles in Preparation for Vaginal Delivery
This study is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Materna Prep Device in reducing pelvic muscle injuries during vaginal delivery.
Subjects are randomized to Materna Prep Device or Standard of Care without use of the Materna Prep Device
Intervention with the Materna Prep Device is expected to be a one-time use of approximately 30-90 minutes during the 1st stage of labor.
Subject participation in the study is targeted to be 3 months from the time of the use of the device during delivery with optional long-term follow-up.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Vaginal delivery is a major risk factor for pelvic floor dysfunction. Clinical aspects of pelvic floor dysfunction include pelvic organ prolapse, sexual dysfunction, and fecal and urinary incontinence. Trauma to the pelvic structures occurs as the fetal head passes through the vaginal canal, especially with acute distension at the time of crowning - the exiting of the fetal head.
The Materna Prep Device is a single-use, semi-automated dilator used during the first phase of labor in order to prepare the vaginal canal for vaginal delivery. By slowly pre-stretching the vagina and surrounding pelvic tissues during labor, the device is essentially dictating the strain rate of the tissue during labor. In previous feasibility studies, the elastic recovery of the tissue has been shown to be on the order of several hours, allowing the benefits of pre-stretching the vagina and surrounding pelvic tissues to last throughout labor. The device is intended to be removed prior to the initiation of the second stage of labor, for delivery to occur unobstructed.
The target patient population for this study is nulliparous women entering the first phase of labor and scheduled for vaginal delivery with an epidural.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
- University of California Los Angeles
-
Mountain View, California, United States, 94040
- El Camino Hospital
-
-
Delaware
-
Newark, Delaware, United States, 19718
- Christiana Care - Center for Women's & Children's Health
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
New Jersey
-
Camden, New Jersey, United States, 08103
- The Cooper Health System
-
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08901
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
-
Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07103
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44109
- The Metro Health System
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
- Oregon Health and Science University
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19140
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19718
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Baylor College of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject is scheduled for vaginal birth.
- Subject is gestating a single fetus.
- Subject is nulliparous, or had a previous pregnancy terminated within 24 weeks gestation.
- Subject is able and willing to comply with the protocol required follow-up visits.
- Subject is able and willing to provide written informed consent prior to enrollment.
- In the opinion of the Investigator, the subject has sufficient mental capacity to understand the informed consent form (ICF), comply with the protocol requirements, and provide clinically relevant and reliable feedback regarding their experience with the device.
- Subject receives epidural anesthesia during labor prior to enrollment.
- Subject is 18 years of age or older at time of consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject has high likelihood of less than 1 hour of potential device dilation time after she arrives at the hospital.
- Subject is planning or requires a Caesarean-section prior to randomization.
- Subject begins labor with less than 36 weeks gestation.
- Subject has a neurological disorder that could cause pelvic floor dysfunction, such as multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury.
- Subject has a collagen-associated disorder that affects tissue elasticity, such as scleroderma or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
- Subject has a localized (genital tract) or systemic infection.
- Subject has a medical history which could lead to pelvic floor dysfunction, such as prior pelvic fractures, pelvic soft tissue injuries, or vaginal surgery.
- Subject has any general health condition or systemic disease that may represent, in the opinion of the Investigator, a potential increased risk associated with device use or pregnancy.
- Subject has placenta previa or vasa previa.
- Subject has known significant chromosomal or structural fetal anomalies.
- Subject has a category 2 and/or 3 fetal tracing that is unresolved.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Materna Prep Device
|
Subjects are treated with Materna Prep Device prior to vaginal delivery
|
|
No Intervention: Standard of Care (SOC)
Standard of Care Control
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The occurrence of pelvic muscle injury, defined as complete or partial detachment of the levator ani muscle diagnosed via ultrasound imagingmuscle diagnosed via ultrasound imaging
Time Frame: 3-month Follow-up
|
Use transperineal ultrasound to identify levator ani muscle detachment
|
3-month Follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Levator Hiatal Area
Time Frame: 3-month Follow-up
|
Compare the levator hiatal area (cm2 - measurement between pelvic muscle and pelvic bone)
|
3-month Follow-up
|
|
The occurrence of pelvic muscle injury, defined as complete detachment of the levator ani muscle diagnosed via ultrasound imaging
Time Frame: 3-month Follow-up
|
Use transperineal ultrasound to identify levator ani muscle detachment
|
3-month Follow-up
|
|
Length of 2nd Stage Labor
Time Frame: Day of Delivery
|
Compare the length of the second stage of labor, defined as the time from the cervix being dilated to 10 cm to the complete delivery of the baby between study groups.
|
Day of Delivery
|
|
Perineal Lacerations
Time Frame: Day of Delivery
|
Compare the rate of perineal lacerations determined by visual insepction post-delivery between study groups
|
Day of Delivery
|
|
Obstetric anal sphincter injury - OASI
Time Frame: Day of Delivery
|
Compare the rate of tearing of the muscles of the anal sphincter between study groups.
|
Day of Delivery
|
|
Obstetric anal sphincter injury - OASI
Time Frame: 3-month Follow-up
|
Compare the rate of tearing of the muscles of the anal sphincter on ultrasound between study groups.
|
3-month Follow-up
|
|
C-Sections
Time Frame: Day of Delivery
|
Compare the rate of C-Section due to arrest of labot in the second stage
|
Day of Delivery
|
|
Infant APGAR scores
Time Frame: Day of Delivery
|
Compare infant APGAR scores between study groups.
|
Day of Delivery
|
|
Qualitative pelvic health feedback
Time Frame: 3-month Follow-up
|
Compare qualitative pelvic health feedback assessed by PFIQ-7and PFDI-20 Questionnaires
|
3-month Follow-up
|
|
Operative Delivery
Time Frame: Day of Delivery
|
Compare the rate of instrument use in vaginal deliveries between study groups
|
Day of Delivery
|
|
First Push to Delivery
Time Frame: Day of Delivery
|
Compare the mean time form first push to delivery between study groups.
|
Day of Delivery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CP0001.G
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse
-
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsRecruitingPelvic Organ Prolapse | Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal Surgery | Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Patient Education | Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)United States
-
Hillel Yaffe Medical CenterCompletedHysterectomy | Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal Surgery | Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)Israel
-
University of CalgaryAlberta Health services; Cook Group IncorporatedCompletedAnterior Pelvic Organ ProlapseCanada
-
Wolfson Medical CenterRecruiting
-
Queen's UniversityNot yet recruitingPelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)Canada
-
Coloplast A/SCompletedPelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)United States
-
Chung Shan Medical UniversityActive, not recruitingPelvic Organ Prolapse | Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal Surgery | Sacrocolpopexy | PectopexyTaiwan
-
A.M.I. Agency for Medical Innovations GmbHActive, not recruitingProlapse | Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) | SacrocolpopexyGermany
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedPelvic Organ Prolapse, Patient EducationCanada
-
University of MelbourneCompletedVaginal Hysterectomy | Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal SurgeryAustralia
Clinical Trials on Materna Prep Device
-
Materna MedicalEl Camino Hospital, Mountain View, CA; Altos Oaks Medical Group, Mountain View...WithdrawnChildbirthUnited States
-
Materna MedicalUniversity of MichiganActive, not recruiting
-
Baylor College of MedicineMaterna MedicalCompletedTear, Pelvic Organ, Obstetric TraumaUnited States
-
The Baruch Padeh Medical Center, PoriyaUnknownInfant, Newborn, DiseasesIsrael
-
Materna LaboratoriesUnknownFocus on Healthy Infant Growth.Israel
-
University of UlsterNorthern Ireland Chest Heart and StrokeCompleted
-
Medstar Health Research InstituteNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedHIV Prevention ProgramUnited States
-
Northwestern UniversityActive, not recruitingPrEP EducationUnited States
-
Penn State UniversityCompleted
-
University of WashingtonNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); Kenyatta National...Completed