The Relationship Between NLR and PONV and ESPB

July 24, 2025 updated by: Guanghan Wu, Qianfoshan Hospital

The Relationship Between the Preoperative Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) in Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients, as Well as the Impact of Erector Spinae Plane Block on NLR and PONV

This study aims to investigate whether preoperative NLR (Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio) serves as a biomarker for PONV (Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting). It also examines the impact of erector spinae plane block on NLR and PONV. Furthermore, the research explores the effect of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain relief in spinal surgery and its influence on the usage of opioid medications.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

220

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar spine surgery in a prone position under general anesthesia.
  2. ASA classification grades I to II.
  3. Age between 18 and 80 years old.
  4. Signed the informed consent for this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Preoperative blood transfusion.
  2. Uncontrolled systemic diseases.
  3. Patients with known uncontrolled systemic inflammatory diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, or active infections).
  4. Gastrointestinal system disorders.
  5. History of antiemetic and anticholinergic drug use.
  6. History of adverse reactions related to surgery, deformity correction surgeries, defined as procedures involving instrumentation across three or more levels or aimed at correcting scoliosis or kyphosis.
  7. Severe spinal deformities.
  8. Infection at the puncture site.
  9. Coagulation disorders.
  10. Long-term use of sedatives and analgesic drugs before surgery.
  11. Patients with mental illness or communication barriers.
  12. Allergic to ropivacaine.
  13. Participants involved in other clinical studies within the past 3 months.
  14. History of previous lumbar surgeries.
  15. Subjective unwillingness to participate in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Erector Spinae Plane Block group(EA group + EB group)
Conventional anesthesia induction, followed by ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESPB) block with 0.5% ropivacaine (20 ml) after anesthesia induction.
The patient assumes a prone position, and the appropriate lumbar vertebral level is identified using ultrasound, based on the preoperative markings of the surgical incision site. After disinfection, the ultrasound probe is placed in the parasagittal direction, 3 centimeters lateral to the midline, to identify the corresponding lumbar transverse process and the overlying erector spinae and latissimus dorsi muscles. Using an in-plane technique, the needle is advanced, and when the needle tip contacts the bony transverse process and there is no blood or gas upon aspiration, 2-3 mL of isotonic saline solution is injected to confirm the correct needle position. Local anesthetic is then injected between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process. The spread of the local anesthetic in the deep fascial plane within the erector spinae muscle can be visualized using ultrasound.
Sham Comparator: Control group(CA group + CB group)
Conventional anesthesia induction, followed by ultrasound-guided injection of 0.9% saline (20 ml) into the erector spinae plane (ESPB) after anesthesia induction.
The patient is placed in a prone position, and the appropriate lumbar vertebral level is determined using ultrasound based on the preoperative markings of the surgical incision site. After disinfection, the ultrasound probe is positioned in the parasagittal direction, 3 centimeters lateral to the midline, to identify the corresponding lumbar transverse process, erector spinae, and latissimus dorsi muscles above it. Using an in-plane technique, the needle is advanced, and when the needle tip contacts the bony transverse process, and there is no blood or gas upon aspiration, 2-3 milliliters of isotonic saline solution are injected to confirm the correct needle position. Subsequently, 20 milliliters of 0.9% physiological saline is injected between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process. The diffusion of the physiological saline in the deep fascial plane within the erector spinae muscle can be visualized using ultrasound.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Record nausea and vomiting within the PACU and during the first 24 hours and second 24 hours after surgery.
Time Frame: Within the first 24 hours and the second 24 hours after surgery.
Patients with a nausea and vomiting score of 1 point or above (0 points = no nausea, 1 point = nausea, 2 points = dry heaving, 3 points = vomiting) are treated with ondansetron as an antiemetic.
Within the first 24 hours and the second 24 hours after surgery.
Record the need for antiemetic medication within the PACU and during the first 24 hours and the second 24 hours postoperatively.
Time Frame: Within the first 24 hours and the second 24 hours after surgery.
Record the need for antiemetic medication within the PACU and during the first 24 hours and the second 24 hours postoperatively.
Within the first 24 hours and the second 24 hours after surgery.
Record the neutrophil count and lymphocyte count on the first day after surgery and calculate the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)
Time Frame: Within the first 24 hours.
The neutrophil count and lymphocyte count and calculate the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).
Within the first 24 hours.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall VAS (Visual Analog Scale) pain scores at 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours postoperatively during rest and movement.
Time Frame: At 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after surgery
VAS scoring criteria, also known as pain level scoring criteria, use a visual analog method to assess the severity of pain.The VAS (Visual Analog Scale) rating ranges from 0 to 10, with a VAS score of 0 indicating no pain. Scores of 1-3 represent mild pain (pain does not affect sleep), 4-6 indicate moderate pain (pain disrupts sleep), 7-9 correspond to severe pain (unable to fall asleep or waking up due to pain, or unable to sleep), and a score of 10 signifies excruciating pain. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
At 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after surgery
Record the time of the patient's initial self-administration of the pain pump during the first 24 hours and the second 24 hours after surgery.
Time Frame: Within the first 24 hours and the second 24 hours after surgery
Record the time of the patient's initial self-administration of the pain pump during the first 24 hours and the second 24 hours after surgery.
Within the first 24 hours and the second 24 hours after surgery
Record the time of the initial press of the patient-controlled analgesia pump.
Time Frame: Within the first 24 hours and the second 24 hours after surgery
Record the time of the initial press of the patient-controlled analgesia pump.
Within the first 24 hours and the second 24 hours after surgery
Record the satisfaction scores for pain management at 24 and 48 hours.
Time Frame: Within the first 24 hours and the second 24 hours after surgery
Patient satisfaction score refers to the postoperative satisfaction level of the patient, with 0 points indicating dissatisfaction, 1 point indicating fair, 2 points indicating satisfaction, and 3 points indicating very satisfied. The higher the score, the more satisfied the patient is with the treatment outcome.
Within the first 24 hours and the second 24 hours after surgery
Record the postoperative awakening time.
Time Frame: Within 24 hours.
Record the postoperative awakening time.
Within 24 hours.
Record the extubation time after surgery.
Time Frame: Within 24 hours.
Record the extubation time after surgery.
Within 24 hours.
Postoperative stay in the PACU (Post-Anesthesia Care Unit).
Time Frame: Within 24 hours.
Postoperative stay in the PACU (Post-Anesthesia Care Unit).
Within 24 hours.
Time of discharge post-surgery.
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks.
Time of discharge post-surgery.
Within 2 weeks.
Document the occurrence rate of opioid-related side effects such as dizziness and urinary retention.
Time Frame: Within 1 week
Document the occurrence rate of opioid-related side effects such as dizziness and urinary retention.
Within 1 week
Measure neutrophil extracellular trap (NETs) formation in serum on the first postoperative day.
Time Frame: At 24 hours after surgery
Measure neutrophil extracellular trap (NETs) formation in serum on the first postoperative day.
At 24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Erector Spinae Plane Block

Clinical Trials on Erector Spinae Plane Block

Subscribe