rTMS Treatment of Spasticity in Children With Cerebral Palsy/ Hemiplegia Due to ABI - a RCT

March 27, 2026 updated by: Winnie Wan Yee Tso (Dr), The University of Hong Kong

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for the Treatment of Spasticity in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy/ Hemiplegia Due to Acquired Brain Injury - a Randomized Controlled Trial

This RCT aims to investigate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnatic stimulation (rTMS) in treating children with hemiplegoc cerebral palsy. The study will measure any improvement in spasticity after using contra-lesional inhibitory rTMS follow by intensive limb training.

Participants will attend a 10-day rTMS treatment sessions, follow by intensive training of the impaired limb. They will also undergo MRI scans before and after the treatment to investiagte the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms that lead to changes clinically by using TMS as well as MR-DKI. Researchers will compare the intervention group and the sham group to see if rTMS could result in improvement of participants' spasticity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cerebral palsy is the most common cause of lifelong physical disability in childhood, with an estimated prevalence of 1.5 per 1000 living biths for primary school-aged children. Spasticity is the most common symptoms in children with cerebral palsy, leading to muscle weakness affecting gross motor functions and causing complications such as pain, contracture and subluzation which will lead to inability to perform activity-based training and subsequently lead to further muscle weakness. Standard therapy with regular physiotherapy and occupational therapy are essential but time-consuming and the effects might not last for longer duration. Patients or caregivers decline medications because of side effects drowsiness while other interventions such as intra-thecal baclofen pump, rhizotomy or surgery are invasive.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that has the ability to modulate excitation of the motor cortex area of the brain. There were past studies suggesting that using contralesional inhibitory rTMS was safe and feasible for patients with paediatric subcortical stroke and seemed to improve hand function in patients with hemiparesis. However, limited studies have been published on the effects of rTMS on improving spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Hence, the objective of this study is to use low-frequency rTMS to the contra-lesional hemisphere in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy to investigate if rTMS follow by intensive limb training would improve spasiticity of these children and whether the improvement can be sustained for a longer time. The underlying mechanisms that lead to the changes clinically will also be investigated by TMS and MRI.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Winnie Wan Yee Tso, MBBS
  • Phone Number: +85222554295
  • Email: wytso@hku.hk

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 0000
        • Recruiting
        • Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged between 7 years and 18 years
  • Diagnosis of cerebral palsy with hemiplegia
  • Upper limb spasticity ≥ 1
  • IQ ≥ 50

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any contra-indications to rTMS
  • Severe spasticity (score of 4 or more in Ashworth scale)
  • Uncontrollable epilepsy
  • History of Botulinum toxin A injection in previous 6 months
  • Upper limb casting in previous 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interventional rTMS group
The intervention group will receive 1 Hz active rTMS during treatment, lasting for 20 minutes, follow up by 30 minutes of intensive limb training.
1 Hz rTMS treatment for 20 mins, follow by 30 mins intensive limb training
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS group
The sham group will not receive any Hz of rTMS during treatment, also lasting for 20 minutes with 30 minutes of intensive limb training afterwards.
Sham Hz rTMS treatment for 20 mins, follow by 30 mins intensive limb training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention
Clinical measure of spasticity. Scores range from 0 to 4, with a higher score indicate worse in muscle tone
Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention
The range of motion scores
Time Frame: Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention
ROM of thumb adduction, wrist dorsal flexion and extension, and elbow dorsal flexion and extension. Patients' range of motion score will be compared to the normative values
Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Zancolli scale
Time Frame: Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention
Severity of forearm alignment. Scores range from 0 to 3 with a higher score indicate worse hand function
Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention
House functional classification scale
Time Frame: Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention
Rating of functional use of the impaired upper limb. Scale consists of nine grades from 0 (does not use) to 8 (full spontaneous use)
Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention
Gross motor function measure
Time Frame: Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention
Changes in motor function. A 4-point Likert scale with higher score indicates better motor function
Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention
Assisting hand assessment
Time Frame: Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention
Test of hand function
Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention
Pediatric Quality of Life Cerebral Palsy module
Time Frame: Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention
Quality of life measurement. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher score indicate better quality of life.
Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention
MRI Brain: fMRI and DKI
Time Frame: Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention
Functional MRI and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging measuring the brain microstructural changes and structural connectivity during the intervention
Day 10, 17 of intervention and 2 months post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 13, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on CP (Cerebral Palsy)

Clinical Trials on Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Subscribe