A Study to Compare the Results of FGFR Testing by Either ctDNA Blood Testing or Standard Tumor Tissue Testing

December 8, 2025 updated by: Bernie Eigl

ctDNA-FGFR Status as a Predictive Biomarker for FGFR Targeted Therapy

A new drug, erdafitinib, became available for some patients with bladder cancer that has spread to other organs. To qualify, patients must have specific genetic changes in their tumors. Currently, doctors use tumor tissue samples to check for these genetic changes, but these samples might not accurately reflect the current state of the patient's cancer.

In this study, Investigators will test the patient's blood for these genetic changes in addition to the tumor tissue samples. It is thought that the blood test will give a more accurate result.

Investigators hope this study will help to find out if more patients can benefit from erdafitinib than the ones identified by tissue testing only.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Recently, the first targeted therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) received approval, i.e. erdafitinib. Erdafitinib is a pan-FGFR small molecule inhibitor. Approximately twenty percent of mUC patients' tumors harbor qualifying alterations in FGFR2 or FGFR3. Currently, standard testing uses archival tumor tissue. However, this type of testing may not be representative of a patient's clinically dominant tumor clone at the time of treatment initiation due to temporal and spatial biopsy bias of archival tissue testing.

In this study, patients will undergo circulating tumor DNA testing, in addition to conventional tissue testing, for treatment eligibility. Investigators hypothesize that blood-based ctDNA testing will provide a more accurate assessment of somatic FGFR status than same patient archival primary tissue.

This study's objectives are:

Objective 1 (Primary): To evaluate the diagnostic value of ctDNA testing against the "gold standard" of tissue testing.

Objective 2 (Secondary): To evaluate whether ctDNA may be a superior predictive marker by identifying actionable FGFR alterations that are currently missed on tissue assays.

Procedures:

  • Medical history will be reviewed, including all previous anti-cancer treatments.
  • A blood sample will be collected for ctDNA testing at the time of screening for FGFR alterations and at progression under erdafitinib therapy. Test results will be compared to archival tissue testing.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

260

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 5G2
        • Arthur J.E Child Comprehensive Cancer Centre
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 1Z2
        • Cross Cancer Institute
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 4E6
        • BC Cancer Agency
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W9
        • London Health Sciences Centre
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
        • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
        • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
    • Quebec
      • Québec, Quebec, Canada, G1R 2J6
        • CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who are screened for erdafitinib eligibility as standard of care.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with metastatic bladder cancer who are about to undergo tissue testing for FGFR mutations and who have blood samples drawn during the management of their disease are eligible to be included in this analysis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastatic bladder cancer patients who will not have tissue sent for FGFR testing will be excluded from this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Metastatic Bladder Cancer
Patients with metastatic bladder cancer who will have archival tissue sent for FGFR testing.
Determine whether ctDNA testing for FGFR provides the same results as the standard tissue testing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the diagnostic value of ctDNA testing against standard tissue testing
Time Frame: For the primary objective, a single blood sample is collected at the time of screening for treatment eligibility
Investigators will evaluate ctDNA as a diagnostic test against the de facto gold standard of tissue testing.
For the primary objective, a single blood sample is collected at the time of screening for treatment eligibility

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate whether ctDNA may be a superior predictive marker by identifying actionable FGFR mutations that are currently missed on tissue assays
Time Frame: For this secondary objective, a single blood sample is collected at the time of screening for treatment eligibility
To quantify the additional value of ctDNA testing, Investigators will calculate the percentage of eligible patients based on ctDNA testing among conventional testing ineligible or "negative" patients.
For this secondary objective, a single blood sample is collected at the time of screening for treatment eligibility

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Bernhard Eigl, British Columbia Cancer Agency
  • Study Chair: Alexander Wyatt, Vancouver Prostate Centre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

No plans for future use of the data at this point. Only the study Principal Investigator will have access to the data in the future.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on FGFR Testing

Subscribe